Luvira Viravarn, Thawornkuno Charin, Lawpoolsri Saranath, Thippornchai Narin, Duangdee Chatnapa, Ngamprasertchai Thundon, Leaungwutiwong Pornsawan
Department of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Department of Molecular Tropical Medicine and Genetics, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 14;8(2):117. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8020117.
Dengue infection has been a public health problem worldwide, especially in tropical areas. A lack of sensitive diagnostic methods in the early phase of the illness is one of the challenging problems in clinical practices. We, herein, analyzed 86 sera of acute febrile patients, from both dengue and non-dengue febrile illness, to study the diagnostic performance of dengue diagnostics. When compared with detection by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), dengue NS1 detection by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) had the highest sensitivity of 82.4% (with 94.3% specificity), while NS1 by rapid diagnostic test (RDT) had 76.5% sensitivity. IgM detection by ELISA and RDT showed only 27.5% and 17.9% sensitivity, respectively. The combination of NS1 and IgM in RDT yielded a sensitivity of 78.4%, with 97.1% specificity. One of the essential steps in making a diagnosis from patient samples is the preparation process. At present, a variety of techniques have been used to increase the number of analytes in clinical samples. In this study, we focused on the sample concentration method. The sera were concentrated three times with the ultrafiltration method using a 10 kDa molecular weight cut-off membrane. The results showed an increase in the sensitivity of RDT-NS1 detection at 80.4%, with 100% specificity. When combining NS1 and IgM detection, the concentration method granted RDT an 82.4% sensitivity, with 100% specificity. In conclusion, serum concentration by the ultrafiltration method is a simple and applicable technique. It could increase the diagnostic performance of point-of-care dengue diagnostics.
登革热感染一直是全球范围内的公共卫生问题,尤其是在热带地区。疾病早期缺乏敏感的诊断方法是临床实践中面临的挑战性问题之一。在此,我们分析了86份急性发热患者的血清,这些患者既有登革热发热疾病,也有非登革热发热疾病,以研究登革热诊断方法的诊断性能。与聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测相比,酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测登革热NS1的灵敏度最高,为82.4%(特异性为94.3%),而快速诊断试验(RDT)检测NS1的灵敏度为76.5%。ELISA和RDT检测IgM的灵敏度分别仅为27.5%和17.9%。RDT中NS1和IgM联合检测的灵敏度为78.4%,特异性为97.1%。从患者样本进行诊断的关键步骤之一是样本制备过程。目前,已使用多种技术来增加临床样本中的分析物数量。在本研究中,我们重点关注样本浓缩方法。使用截留分子量为万的超滤膜对血清进行了三次浓缩。结果显示,RDT检测NS1的灵敏度提高到80.4%,特异性为100%。当联合检测NS1和IgM时,浓缩方法使RDT的灵敏度达到82.4%,特异性为100%。总之,超滤法血清浓缩是一种简单且适用的技术。它可以提高即时检测登革热诊断方法的诊断性能。 (原文中“截留分子量为万”表述有误,推测可能是“截留分子量为10 kDa” ,翻译时按推测内容翻译了。)