• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

立体定向射频消融术(SRFA)治疗恶性肝肿瘤的可靠性:新手与经验丰富的操作者对比

Reliability of Stereotactic Radiofrequency Ablation (SRFA) for Malignant Liver Tumors: Novice versus Experienced Operators.

作者信息

Schullian Peter, Laimer Gregor, Johnston Edward, Putzer Daniel, Eberle Gernot, Widmann Gerlig, Scharll Yannick, Bale Reto

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, Chelsea, London SW3 6JJ, UK.

出版信息

Biology (Basel). 2023 Jan 22;12(2):175. doi: 10.3390/biology12020175.

DOI:10.3390/biology12020175
PMID:36829454
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9952769/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the results of a novice with those of experienced interventional radiologists (IRs) for stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) of malignant liver tumors in terms of safety, technical success, and local tumor control.

METHODS

A database, including all SRFA procedures performed in a single center between January 2011 and December 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. A total of 39 ablation sessions performed by a novice IR were compared to the results of three more experienced IRs. Comparative SRFA sessions were selected using propensity score matching considering tumor type, age, sex, tumor size, and tumor number as matching variables. Overall, 549 target tumors were treated in 273 sessions. Median tumor size was 2.2 cm (1.0-8.5 cm) for 178 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and 3.0 cm (0.5-13.0 cm) for 371 metastases. A median of 2 (1-11) tumors were treated per session.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed when comparing the results of more experienced IRs with those of a novice IR regarding the rates of major complications (6.8% [16/234] vs. 5.1% [2/39]; = 0.477), mortality (1.3% [2/234] vs. 0% [0/39]; = 0.690), primary technical efficacy (98.5% [525/533] vs. 98.9% [94/95]; = 0.735), and local recurrence (5.6% [30/533] vs. 5.3% [5/95]; = 0.886). However, the median planning/placement time was significantly shorter for the experienced IRs (92 min vs. 119 min; = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

SRFA is a safe, effective, and reliable treatment option for malignant liver tumors and favorable outcomes can be achieved even by inexperienced operators with minimal supervision.

摘要

目的

比较新手与经验丰富的介入放射科医生(IR)进行立体定向射频消融(SRFA)治疗恶性肝肿瘤在安全性、技术成功率和局部肿瘤控制方面的结果。

方法

回顾性分析一个数据库,该数据库包含2011年1月至2018年12月在单一中心进行的所有SRFA手术。将新手IR进行的39次消融手术结果与另外三名经验更丰富的IR的结果进行比较。使用倾向得分匹配法选择对比的SRFA手术,将肿瘤类型、年龄、性别、肿瘤大小和肿瘤数量作为匹配变量。总体而言,在273次手术中治疗了549个目标肿瘤。178例肝细胞癌(HCC)的中位肿瘤大小为2.2 cm(1.0 - 8.5 cm),371例转移瘤的中位肿瘤大小为3.0 cm(0.5 - 13.0 cm)。每次手术治疗的肿瘤中位数为2个(1 - 11个)。

结果

在比较经验更丰富的IR与新手IR的结果时,未观察到重大并发症发生率(6.8% [16/234] 对5.1% [2/39];P = 0.477)、死亡率(

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a9/9952769/07ff54b0d685/biology-12-00175-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a9/9952769/c0335cee2e09/biology-12-00175-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a9/9952769/926d1f6d85dd/biology-12-00175-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a9/9952769/eed66bed5f42/biology-12-00175-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a9/9952769/07ff54b0d685/biology-12-00175-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a9/9952769/c0335cee2e09/biology-12-00175-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a9/9952769/926d1f6d85dd/biology-12-00175-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a9/9952769/eed66bed5f42/biology-12-00175-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a9/9952769/07ff54b0d685/biology-12-00175-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability of Stereotactic Radiofrequency Ablation (SRFA) for Malignant Liver Tumors: Novice versus Experienced Operators.立体定向射频消融术(SRFA)治疗恶性肝肿瘤的可靠性:新手与经验丰富的操作者对比
Biology (Basel). 2023 Jan 22;12(2):175. doi: 10.3390/biology12020175.
2
Stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of subcardiac hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control study.心脏下肝癌的立体定向射频消融治疗:一项病例对照研究。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):876-885. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1648886.
3
Stereotactic Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumors in Octogenarians.老年患者肝脏肿瘤的立体定向射频消融术
Front Oncol. 2019 Sep 19;9:929. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00929. eCollection 2019.
4
Feasibility, safety, and long-term efficacy of stereotactic radiofrequency ablation for tumors adjacent to the diaphragm in the hepatic dome: a case-control study.肝穹窿部毗邻膈肌肿瘤行立体定向射频消融治疗的可行性、安全性和长期疗效:一项病例对照研究。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):950-960. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06399-y. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
5
Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors.2653 个肝脏肿瘤立体定向射频消融的技术疗效和局部复发:15 年单中心经验及预后因素评估。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):421-430. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2044522.
6
Stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatic resection.肝切除术后复发性结直肠肝转移的立体定向射频消融(SRFA)。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr;47(4):866-873. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.034. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
7
Stereotactic Radiofrequency Ablation of Breast Cancer Liver Metastases: Short- and Long-Term Results with Predicting Factors for Survival.立体定向射频消融治疗乳腺癌肝转移:生存预测因素的短期和长期结果。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Aug;44(8):1184-1193. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02820-6. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
8
Safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiofrequency ablation for very large (≥8 cm) primary and metastatic liver tumors.立体定向射频消融治疗非常大(≥8cm)原发性和转移性肝肿瘤的安全性和有效性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 31;10(1):1618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58383-y.
9
Frequency and risk factors for major complications after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors in 1235 ablation sessions: a 15-year experience.1235 次消融术中立体定向射频消融治疗肝肿瘤后主要并发症的频率和危险因素:15 年经验。
Eur Radiol. 2021 May;31(5):3042-3052. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07409-0. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
10
Stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) of liver lesions: technique effectiveness, safety, and interoperator performance.肝脏病变的立体定向射频消融(SRFA):技术效果、安全性和操作者间性能。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Jun;35(3):570-80. doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0200-4. Epub 2011 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance Comparison of Augmented Reality Versus Ultrasound Guidance for Puncture: A Phantom Study.增强现实与超声引导穿刺的性能比较:一项体模研究。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Jul;47(7):993-999. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03727-8. Epub 2024 May 6.
2
Navigation and Robotics in Interventional Oncology: Current Status and Future Roadmap.介入肿瘤学中的导航与机器人技术:现状与未来路线图
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 31;14(1):98. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010098.

本文引用的文献

1
Stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of primary liver tumors in the caudate lobe.尾状叶原发性肝癌的立体定向射频消融治疗。
HPB (Oxford). 2020 Mar;22(3):470-478. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.09.008. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
2
Feasibility, safety, and long-term efficacy of stereotactic radiofrequency ablation for tumors adjacent to the diaphragm in the hepatic dome: a case-control study.肝穹窿部毗邻膈肌肿瘤行立体定向射频消融治疗的可行性、安全性和长期疗效:一项病例对照研究。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):950-960. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06399-y. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
3
Impact of an ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation training program on the outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
超声引导下射频消融治疗肝癌培训项目对患者治疗效果的影响。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019 Dec;100(12):771-780. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
4
Stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of subcardiac hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control study.心脏下肝癌的立体定向射频消融治疗:一项病例对照研究。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):876-885. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1648886.
5
CT-guided versus laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation in recurrent small hepatocellular carcinoma against the diaphragmatic dome.CT 引导下与腹腔镜下射频消融治疗膈顶复发性小肝细胞癌的比较。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 14;7:44583. doi: 10.1038/srep44583.
6
Evaluation of the Effect of Cumulative Operator Experience on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Primary Treatment with Radiofrequency Ablation.评估累积操作人员经验对原发性射频消融治疗后肝细胞癌复发的影响。
Radiology. 2015 Jul;276(1):294-301. doi: 10.1148/radiol.15141864. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
7
Adjunctive radiofrequency ablation of metastatic neuroendocrine cancer to the liver complements surgical resection.肝转移神经内分泌癌的辅助射频消融术补充了手术切除。
HPB (Oxford). 2013 Mar;15(3):190-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00528.x. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
8
Small liver colorectal metastases treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: local response rate and long-term survival with up to 10-year follow-up.经皮射频消融治疗小肝结直肠转移瘤:最长 10 年随访的局部反应率和长期生存率。
Radiology. 2012 Dec;265(3):958-68. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111851. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
9
Percutaneous stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases.经皮立体定向射频消融治疗结直肠肝转移瘤。
Eur Radiol. 2012 Apr;22(4):930-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2314-0. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
10
Survival comparison between surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for patients in BCLC very early/early stage hepatocellular carcinoma.手术切除与射频消融治疗巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期非常早期/早期肝癌患者的生存比较。
J Hepatol. 2012 Feb;56(2):412-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.05.020. Epub 2011 Jul 12.