Kumar Nagi B, Bahl Saira, Dhillon Jasreman, Poch Michael, Manley Brandon, Li Roger, Schell Michael, Powsang Julio
Cancer Epidemiology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 16;15(4):1257. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041257.
Clinical trials play a critical role in evidence-based medicine, when rigorous scientific methodology is utilized to discover and test the effectiveness and safety of new drugs to prevent or cure diseases, including cancer. Participation in clinical trials thus becomes key to successful completion of these trials. Although it is estimated that >70% of Americans are inclined to participate in clinical trials, less than 5% of adult cancer patients participate in clinical trials. There is thus a large gap between those inclined to participate in clinical trials and actual participation in clinical trials. As with trials targeting men with prostate cancer (PCa) on active surveillance (AS), where the target population is mostly over 50 years of age, others have observed several challenges with recruitment and accrual in clinical trials. The participation rate is currently unavailable for men on primary and secondary chemoprevention trials. Additionally, with unanticipated environmental factors such as a pandemic or other natural emergencies that may severely impact the economy, personal property, travel and person-to person contact for study-related procedures, there is a need to continuously identify these challenges and determine solutions to recruitment barriers in chemoprevention trials to ensure timely completion of early phase trials. Recent studies regarding the impact of the pandemic on clinical trial recruitment have shown that cancer prevention trials were relatively more negatively impacted compared to cancer treatment trials. The goal of this manuscript is to review our experience in continuously evaluating the protocol and patient level challenges to recruiting subjects on AS for PCa in this cancer chemoprevention trial conducted at the Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) and report the contemporary strategies that we are utilizing to continue to recruit subjects in this trial. We provide data from our current trial as an example while discussing future strategies to improve overall clinical trial recruitment. These strategies can inform future design of contemporary cancer chemoprevention trials and, additionally, better select, focus and invest in strategies that are the most productive and efficient for recruiting target populations.
临床试验在循证医学中发挥着关键作用,此时严谨的科学方法被用于发现和测试新药预防或治疗包括癌症在内的疾病的有效性和安全性。因此,参与临床试验成为这些试验成功完成的关键。尽管据估计超过70%的美国人倾向于参与临床试验,但成年癌症患者中只有不到5%参与临床试验。因此,在倾向参与临床试验的人群和实际参与临床试验的人群之间存在很大差距。对于针对接受主动监测(AS)的前列腺癌(PCa)男性患者的试验也是如此,其目标人群大多超过50岁,其他人已经观察到临床试验在招募和入组方面存在一些挑战。目前尚无关于男性在一级和二级化学预防试验中的参与率数据。此外,由于意外的环境因素,如大流行或其他可能严重影响经济、个人财产、旅行以及与研究相关程序的人际接触的自然紧急情况,需要持续识别这些挑战并确定化学预防试验中招募障碍的解决方案,以确保早期试验能够及时完成。最近关于大流行对临床试验招募影响的研究表明,与癌症治疗试验相比,癌症预防试验受到的负面影响相对更大。本手稿的目的是回顾我们在综合癌症中心(CCC)进行的这项癌症化学预防试验中,持续评估招募接受AS的PCa受试者的方案和患者层面挑战的经验,并报告我们目前正在该试验中用于继续招募受试者的当代策略。我们在讨论未来改善整体临床试验招募的策略时,以我们当前试验的数据为例。这些策略可为当代癌症化学预防试验的未来设计提供参考,此外,还能更好地选择、聚焦并投资于对招募目标人群最有成效和效率的策略。