Brambila-Tapia Aniel Jessica Leticia, Macías-Espinoza Fabiola, González-Cantero Joel Omar, Martínez-Arriaga Reyna Jazmín, Reyes-Domínguez Yesica Arlae, Ramírez-García María Luisa
Departamento de Psicología Básica, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico.
Departamento de Psicología Aplicada, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 9;11(4):514. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040514.
We performed a cross-sectional study in order to determine the association between stress coping strategies and stress, depression, and anxiety, in which the Mexican population was invited to answer these variables by an electronic questionnaire. A total of 1283 people were included, of which 64.8% were women. Women presented higher levels of stress, depression, and anxiety than men; likewise, women showed a higher frequency of some maladaptive coping strategies (behavioral disengagement and denial) and lower levels of some adaptive ones (active coping and planning); additionally, maladaptive coping strategies were positively correlated with stress and depression in both sexes: self-blame, behavioral disengagement, denial, substance use, and self-distraction. Likewise, there were negative correlations between stress and depression and the adaptive strategies: planning, active coping, acceptance, and positive reframing. For women, religion presented negative correlations with stress, depression, and anxiety, and humor showed low positive correlations with stress, anxiety, and depression. In conclusion, most adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies are common in both sexes with the exception of religion, which seems to be adaptive in women and neutral in men, and humor, which seems to be adaptive in men and maladaptive in women. In addition, emotional and instrumental support seem to be neutral in both sexes.
我们开展了一项横断面研究,以确定应激应对策略与压力、抑郁和焦虑之间的关联,研究邀请墨西哥人群通过电子问卷回答这些变量。总共纳入了1283人,其中64.8%为女性。女性的压力、抑郁和焦虑水平高于男性;同样,女性表现出某些适应不良应对策略(行为脱离和否认)的频率更高,而某些适应性应对策略(积极应对和计划)的水平更低;此外,适应不良应对策略在两性中均与压力和抑郁呈正相关:自责、行为脱离、否认、物质使用和自我分心。同样,压力、抑郁与适应性策略之间存在负相关:计划、积极应对、接受和积极重新评价。对于女性而言,宗教与压力、抑郁和焦虑呈负相关,而幽默与压力、焦虑和抑郁呈低正相关。总之,除宗教(似乎对女性具有适应性而对男性呈中性)和幽默(似乎对男性具有适应性而对女性具有适应不良性)外,大多数适应性和适应不良应对策略在两性中都很常见。此外,情感支持和工具性支持在两性中似乎都是中性的。