• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国长期护理中资源分配和医疗服务利用的不平等。

Inequalities in Resource Distribution and Healthcare Service Utilization of Long-Term Care in China.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China.

Population Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 16;20(4):3459. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043459.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20043459
PMID:36834152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9962546/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-term care (LTC) services help the elderly maintain their functional ability and live with dignity. In China, the establishment of an equitable LTC system is a primary focus of the current public health reform. This paper assesses levels of equality in resources for and utilization of LTC services between urban and rural areas and economic regions in China.

METHODS

We use social services data from the China Civil Affairs Statistical Yearbooks. Gini coefficients against elderly population size are calculated for the number of institutions, beds, and workers, and the concentration index (CI) against per capita disposable income is calculated for the number of disabled residents per 1000 elderly people and the number of rehabilitation and nursing services per resident.

RESULTS

The Gini coefficients against the elderly population in urban areas indicate relatively good equality. In rural areas, the Gini coefficients have increased rapidly from relatively low values since 2015. The CI values in both urban and rural areas are positive, indicating that utilization is concentrated in the richer population. In rural areas, the CI values for rehabilitation and nursing have remained above 0.50 for the last three years, implying high levels of income-related inequality. The negative CI values for rehabilitation and nursing services in urban areas in the Central economic region and rural areas in the Western region imply a concentration of resource utilization toward poorer groups. The Eastern region shows relatively high internal inequality.

CONCLUSION

Inequalities exist between urban and rural areas in the utilization of LTC services, despite similar numbers of institution and bed resources. Resource distribution and healthcare service utilization are more equal in urban areas, creating a low level of equilibrium. This urban-rural split is a source of risk for both formal and informal LTC. The Eastern region has the largest number of resources, the highest level of utilization, and the greatest internal variation. In the future, the Chinese government should enhance support for the utilization of services for the elderly with LTC needs.

摘要

背景

长期护理(LTC)服务有助于老年人保持其功能能力并有尊严地生活。在中国,建立公平的 LTC 制度是当前公共卫生改革的主要重点。本文评估了中国城乡和经济区域之间 LTC 服务资源和利用的平等程度。

方法

我们使用中国民政统计年鉴中的社会服务数据。根据老年人口规模计算机构数量、床位数量和工作人员数量的基尼系数,并根据每千名老年人中的残疾居民数量和每居民康复和护理服务数量计算人均可支配收入的集中指数(CI)。

结果

城市地区老年人的基尼系数表明相对平等。农村地区的基尼系数自 2015 年以来从相对较低的水平迅速上升。城乡地区的 CI 值均为正,表明利用集中在较富裕的人群中。在农村地区,康复和护理服务的 CI 值在过去三年中一直保持在 0.50 以上,表明收入相关不平等程度较高。中部经济区农村地区和西部农村地区康复和护理服务的负 CI 值意味着资源利用向较贫困群体集中。东部地区表现出相对较高的内部不平等。

结论

尽管机构和床位资源数量相似,但城乡之间在 LTC 服务的利用方面存在不平等。城市地区的资源分配和医疗保健服务利用更加平等,均衡水平较低。这种城乡差距是正规和非正规长期护理的风险来源。东部地区拥有最多的资源、最高的利用率和最大的内部变化。未来,中国政府应加强对有 LTC 需求的老年人服务利用的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9290/9962546/9b516ed050fd/ijerph-20-03459-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9290/9962546/9b516ed050fd/ijerph-20-03459-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9290/9962546/9b516ed050fd/ijerph-20-03459-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Inequalities in Resource Distribution and Healthcare Service Utilization of Long-Term Care in China.中国长期护理中资源分配和医疗服务利用的不平等。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 16;20(4):3459. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043459.
2
Urban-Rural Differences in Long-Term Care Service Status and Needs Among Home-Based Elderly People in China.中国居家老年人长期护理服务现状和需求的城乡差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 5;17(5):1701. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051701.
3
Inequality in the distribution of health resources and health services in China: hospitals versus primary care institutions.中国卫生资源与卫生服务分配中的不平等:医院与基层医疗机构对比
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Mar 3;16(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0543-9.
4
Estimating benefit equity of government health subsidy in healthcare Services in Shandong Province, China: a cross-sectional study.评估中国山东省医疗服务中政府卫生补贴的效益公平性:一项横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 May 18;17(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0775-3.
5
Horizontal inequity trends of health care utilization in rural China after the medicine and healthcare system reform: based on longitudinal data from 2010 to 2018.中国医药卫生体制改革后农村地区卫生服务利用的公平性变化趋势:基于 2010 年至 2018 年的纵向数据。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 May 17;22(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01908-4.
6
Measuring the equity of inpatient utilization in Chinese rural areas.衡量中国农村地区住院服务利用的公平性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug 21;11:201. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-201.
7
Has equity in government subsidy on healthcare improved in China? Evidence from the China's National Health Services Survey.中国政府医疗补贴的公平性有所改善吗?来自中国国家卫生服务调查的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jan 10;16(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0516-z.
8
Growing old before growing rich: inequality in health service utilization among the mid-aged and elderly in Gansu and Zhejiang Provinces, China.未富先老:中国甘肃和浙江两省中老年人健康服务利用不平等。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Sep 4;12:302. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-302.
9
Inequality in the health services utilization in rural and urban china: A horizontal inequality analysis.中国城乡卫生服务利用的不平等:一项横向不平等分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(2):e18625. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018625.
10
Inequality trends of health workforce in different stages of medical system reform (1985-2011) in China.中国医疗体制改革不同阶段(1985 - 2011年)卫生人力的不平等趋势
Hum Resour Health. 2015 Dec 8;13:94. doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0089-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Mild Cognitive Impairment, Religiosity, Spirituality and all-Cause Mortality Among Chinese Older Adults in Ethnic Minority Communities.少数民族社区中国老年人的轻度认知障碍、宗教信仰、精神性与全因死亡率
J Relig Health. 2024 Oct 4. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02149-7.
2
Progress and challenges in integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine in China from 2002 to 2021.2002年至2021年中国中西医结合的进展与挑战
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 6;15:1425940. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1425940. eCollection 2024.
3
Inequity in the utilization of the home and community integrated healthcare and daily care services in older adults with limited mobility in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Revisiting the Nordic long-term care model for older people-still equal?重新审视北欧老年人长期护理模式——仍然平等吗?
Eur J Ageing. 2022 May 3;19(2):201-210. doi: 10.1007/s10433-022-00703-4. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Substantial Differences in Turnover Intention Between Direct Care Workers in Chinese Hospitals and Long-Term Care Facilities.中国医院与长期护理机构直接护理人员离职意愿存在显著差异。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Mar;22(3):696-700.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
3
Examining inequality in utilisation of health management services for the elderly in rural Henan China.
中国失能老年人居家和社区整合型医护服务与日常照料利用的不平等现象
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 7;24(1):744. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05328-z.
4
Income inequality and healthcare utilization of the older adults-based on a study in three provinces and six cities in China.基于中国三省六市的一项研究:老年人的收入不平等与医疗保健利用情况
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 24;12:1435162. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1435162. eCollection 2024.
5
Resolving conflict and promoting coordination for an integrated old-age healthcare service system in China: GMCR-AHP based decision analysis approach.解决中国综合性老年医疗服务体系中的冲突并促进协调:基于博弈论冲突分析-层次分析法的决策分析方法
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 26;10(13):e33470. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33470. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
审视中国河南农村老年人健康管理服务利用不平等现象。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 17;20(1):758. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05630-7.
4
Equal long-term care for equal needs with universal and comprehensive coverage? An assessment using Dutch administrative data.平等需求的长期护理需要普遍和全面的覆盖吗?基于荷兰行政数据的评估。
Health Econ. 2020 Apr;29(4):435-451. doi: 10.1002/hec.3994. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
5
A Sustainable Long-Term Health Care System for Aging China: A Case Study of Regional Practice.为老龄化中国构建可持续的长期医疗保健体系:区域实践案例研究
Health Syst Reform. 2017 Jul 3;3(3):182-190. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2017.1346549.
6
Financing Long-term Care: Lessons From Japan.长期护理融资:来自日本的经验教训。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Aug 1;8(8):462-466. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.35.
7
Unmet long-term care needs and depression: The double disadvantage of community-dwelling older people in rural China.未满足的长期护理需求与抑郁症:中国农村社区老年人面临的双重不利处境
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jan;27(1):126-138. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12630. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
8
Fairness and Eligibility to Long-Term Care: An Analysis of the Factors Driving Inequality and Inequity in the Use of Home Care for Older Europeans.长期护理的公平性与资格:对影响欧洲老年人家庭护理使用方面不平等和不公平的驱动因素的分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 14;14(10):1224. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101224.
9
Income-rich and wealth-poor? The impact of measures of socio-economic status in the analysis of the distribution of long-term care use among older people.收入高但财富少?社会经济地位衡量指标对老年人长期护理使用分布分析的影响。
Health Econ. 2018 Mar;27(3):637-646. doi: 10.1002/hec.3607. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
10
Inequality in the distribution of health resources and health services in China: hospitals versus primary care institutions.中国卫生资源与卫生服务分配中的不平等:医院与基层医疗机构对比
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Mar 3;16(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0543-9.