Fessi Hafedh, Nicoud Philippe, Serrato Tomas, Gilbert Olivia, Courivaud Cécile, Daoud Salima, Morena Marion, Thomas Michel, Canaud Bernard, Cristol Jean-Paul
Nephrology Department, Tenon Hospital, 75020 Paris, France.
Dialysis Department, Aural Dialysis Center, 69008 Lyon, France.
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 8;12(4):1357. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041357.
The RECAP study reports results and outcomes (clinical performances, patient acceptance, cardiac outcomes, and technical survival) achieved with the S system used as an intensive home hemodialysis (HHD) platform over a three-year French multicenter study. Ninety-four dialysis patients issued from ten dialysis centers and treated more than 6 months (mean follow-up: 24 months) with S were included. A two-hour treatment time was maintained in 2/3 of patients to deliver 25 L of dialysis fluid, while 1/3 required up to 3 h to achieve 30 L. The additional convection volume produced by means of the SeCoHD tool (internal filtration backfiltration) was 3 L/session, and the net ultrafiltration produced to achieve dry weight was 1.4 L/session. On a weekly basis, an average 156 L of dialysate corresponding to 94 L of urea clearance when considering 85% dialysate saturation under low flow conditions was delivered. Such urea clearance was equivalent to 9.2 [8.0-13.0] mL/min weekly urea clearance and a standardized Kt/V of 2.5 [1.1-4.5]. The predialysis concentration of selected uremic markers remained remarkably stable over time. Fluid volume status and blood pressure were adequately controlled by means of a relatively low ultrafiltration rate (7.9 mL/h/kg). Technical survival on S was 72% and 58% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The S system was easily handled and kept by patients at home, as indicated by technical survival. Patient perception was improved, while treatment burden was reduced. Cardiac features (assessed in a subset of patients) tended to improve over time. Intensive hemodialysis relying on the S system offers a very appealing option for home treatment with quite satisfactory results, as shown in the RECAP study throughout a two-year follow-up time, and offers the best bridging solution to kidney transplantation.
RECAP研究报告了在一项为期三年的法国多中心研究中,将S系统用作强化家庭血液透析(HHD)平台所取得的结果和结局(临床性能、患者接受度、心脏结局和技术生存率)。纳入了来自十个透析中心、使用S系统治疗超过6个月(平均随访:24个月)的94名透析患者。三分之二的患者维持两小时的治疗时间以输送25升透析液,而三分之一的患者需要长达3小时才能达到30升。通过SeCoHD工具(内部过滤反渗滤)产生的额外对流体积为每次治疗3升,为达到干体重产生的净超滤量为每次治疗1.4升。每周平均输送156升透析液,在低流量条件下考虑85%透析液饱和度时相当于94升尿素清除量。这种尿素清除量相当于每周尿素清除率为9.2[8.0 - 13.0]毫升/分钟,标准化Kt/V为2.5[1.1 - 4.5]。所选尿毒症标志物的透析前浓度随时间保持显著稳定。通过相对较低的超滤率(7.9毫升/小时/千克),液体容量状态和血压得到了充分控制。S系统在1年和2年时的技术生存率分别为72%和58%。如技术生存率所示,S系统易于操作且患者可在家中保存。患者的认知得到改善,同时治疗负担减轻。心脏特征(在部分患者中评估)随时间有改善趋势。如RECAP研究在两年随访期间所示,依赖S系统的强化血液透析为家庭治疗提供了一个非常有吸引力的选择,结果相当令人满意,并且为肾移植提供了最佳的过渡解决方案。