• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用Physidia S系统进行两年家庭强化血液透析的经验:RECAP研究结果

Two Years' Experience of Intensive Home Hemodialysis with the Physidia S System: Results from the RECAP Study.

作者信息

Fessi Hafedh, Nicoud Philippe, Serrato Tomas, Gilbert Olivia, Courivaud Cécile, Daoud Salima, Morena Marion, Thomas Michel, Canaud Bernard, Cristol Jean-Paul

机构信息

Nephrology Department, Tenon Hospital, 75020 Paris, France.

Dialysis Department, Aural Dialysis Center, 69008 Lyon, France.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 8;12(4):1357. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041357.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12041357
PMID:36835894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9958970/
Abstract

The RECAP study reports results and outcomes (clinical performances, patient acceptance, cardiac outcomes, and technical survival) achieved with the S system used as an intensive home hemodialysis (HHD) platform over a three-year French multicenter study. Ninety-four dialysis patients issued from ten dialysis centers and treated more than 6 months (mean follow-up: 24 months) with S were included. A two-hour treatment time was maintained in 2/3 of patients to deliver 25 L of dialysis fluid, while 1/3 required up to 3 h to achieve 30 L. The additional convection volume produced by means of the SeCoHD tool (internal filtration backfiltration) was 3 L/session, and the net ultrafiltration produced to achieve dry weight was 1.4 L/session. On a weekly basis, an average 156 L of dialysate corresponding to 94 L of urea clearance when considering 85% dialysate saturation under low flow conditions was delivered. Such urea clearance was equivalent to 9.2 [8.0-13.0] mL/min weekly urea clearance and a standardized Kt/V of 2.5 [1.1-4.5]. The predialysis concentration of selected uremic markers remained remarkably stable over time. Fluid volume status and blood pressure were adequately controlled by means of a relatively low ultrafiltration rate (7.9 mL/h/kg). Technical survival on S was 72% and 58% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The S system was easily handled and kept by patients at home, as indicated by technical survival. Patient perception was improved, while treatment burden was reduced. Cardiac features (assessed in a subset of patients) tended to improve over time. Intensive hemodialysis relying on the S system offers a very appealing option for home treatment with quite satisfactory results, as shown in the RECAP study throughout a two-year follow-up time, and offers the best bridging solution to kidney transplantation.

摘要

RECAP研究报告了在一项为期三年的法国多中心研究中,将S系统用作强化家庭血液透析(HHD)平台所取得的结果和结局(临床性能、患者接受度、心脏结局和技术生存率)。纳入了来自十个透析中心、使用S系统治疗超过6个月(平均随访:24个月)的94名透析患者。三分之二的患者维持两小时的治疗时间以输送25升透析液,而三分之一的患者需要长达3小时才能达到30升。通过SeCoHD工具(内部过滤反渗滤)产生的额外对流体积为每次治疗3升,为达到干体重产生的净超滤量为每次治疗1.4升。每周平均输送156升透析液,在低流量条件下考虑85%透析液饱和度时相当于94升尿素清除量。这种尿素清除量相当于每周尿素清除率为9.2[8.0 - 13.0]毫升/分钟,标准化Kt/V为2.5[1.1 - 4.5]。所选尿毒症标志物的透析前浓度随时间保持显著稳定。通过相对较低的超滤率(7.9毫升/小时/千克),液体容量状态和血压得到了充分控制。S系统在1年和2年时的技术生存率分别为72%和58%。如技术生存率所示,S系统易于操作且患者可在家中保存。患者的认知得到改善,同时治疗负担减轻。心脏特征(在部分患者中评估)随时间有改善趋势。如RECAP研究在两年随访期间所示,依赖S系统的强化血液透析为家庭治疗提供了一个非常有吸引力的选择,结果相当令人满意,并且为肾移植提供了最佳的过渡解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/9958970/e55c342f4232/jcm-12-01357-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/9958970/c8eeb58caaf2/jcm-12-01357-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/9958970/e78042d070dc/jcm-12-01357-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/9958970/b50aaff688d6/jcm-12-01357-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/9958970/5fb9737b4f06/jcm-12-01357-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/9958970/d308bf2493d1/jcm-12-01357-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/9958970/d037ec147f0b/jcm-12-01357-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/9958970/e55c342f4232/jcm-12-01357-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/9958970/c8eeb58caaf2/jcm-12-01357-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/9958970/e78042d070dc/jcm-12-01357-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/9958970/b50aaff688d6/jcm-12-01357-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/9958970/5fb9737b4f06/jcm-12-01357-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/9958970/d308bf2493d1/jcm-12-01357-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/9958970/d037ec147f0b/jcm-12-01357-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/9958970/e55c342f4232/jcm-12-01357-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Two Years' Experience of Intensive Home Hemodialysis with the Physidia S System: Results from the RECAP Study.使用Physidia S系统进行两年家庭强化血液透析的经验:RECAP研究结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 8;12(4):1357. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041357.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Short Daily Hemodialysis with Physidia S System: Clinical Performance Assessment during the Training Period.使用Physidia S系统进行每日短时血液透析的安全性和有效性:培训期间的临床性能评估
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 11;11(8):2123. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082123.
3
Home hemodialysis treatment and outcomes: retrospective analysis of the Knowledge to Improve Home Dialysis Network in Europe (KIHDNEy) cohort.家庭血液透析治疗及结果:欧洲改善家庭透析网络知识(KIHDNEy)队列的回顾性分析
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Oct 11;19(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1059-2.
4
Is post-dialysis urea rebound significant with long slow hemodialysis?长时间缓慢血液透析时,透析后尿素反弹是否显著?
Blood Purif. 1998;16(4):187-96. doi: 10.1159/000014334.
5
Solute kinetics with short-daily home hemodialysis using slow dialysate flow rate.采用低透析液流速的每日短时家庭血液透析的溶质动力学
Hemodial Int. 2010 Jan;14(1):39-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2009.00399.x. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
6
Short, thrice-weekly hemodialysis is inadequate regardless of small molecule clearance.无论小分子清除情况如何,每周三次的短程血液透析都是不够的。
Int J Artif Organs. 2004 Jun;27(6):452-66. doi: 10.1177/039139880402700603.
7
Quantitative assessment of sodium mass removal using ionic dialysance and sodium gradient as a proxy tool: Comparison of high-flux hemodialysis versus online hemodiafiltration.使用离子透析和钠梯度作为替代工具定量评估钠质量去除:高通量血液透析与在线血液透析滤过的比较。
Artif Organs. 2021 Aug;45(8):E280-E292. doi: 10.1111/aor.13923. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
8
Blood volume changes during three different profiles of dialysate sodium variation with similar intradialytic sodium balances in chronic hemodialyzed patients.在慢性血液透析患者中,三种不同的透析液钠变化模式下的血容量变化情况,这些模式具有相似的透析中钠平衡。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 Jul;30(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90565-5.
9
Volume-Based Peritoneal Dialysis Prescription Guide to Achieve Adequacy Targets.基于容量的腹膜透析处方指南以实现充分性目标。
Perit Dial Int. 2016 Mar-Apr;36(2):188-95. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00255. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
10
Increasing the dialysis volume and frequency in a fixed period of time in CPD patients: the effect on Kpt/V and creatinine clearance.持续不卧床腹膜透析(CPD)患者在固定时间段内增加透析量和频率:对Kt/V和肌酐清除率的影响
Perit Dial Int. 2002 Nov-Dec;22(6):693-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of slow daily home hemodialysis with internal convection on removal of uremic toxins using the Physidia S3 monitor.使用 Physidia S3 监测仪进行每日家庭缓慢内部对流血液透析对清除尿毒症毒素的疗效。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 4;15(1):11609. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91985-y.
2
Transportable, portable, wearable and (partially) implantable haemodialysis systems: comparison of technologies and readiness levels.可运输、便携式、可穿戴及(部分)可植入式血液透析系统:技术与技术就绪水平比较
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Aug 24;17(9):sfae259. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae259. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Does online high-volume hemodiafiltration offer greater efficiency and sustainability compared with high-flux hemodialysis? A detailed simulation analysis anchored in real-world data.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamics of vascular refilling in extended nocturnal hemodialysis.延长夜间血液透析中血管再充盈的动力学。
Hemodial Int. 2022 Oct;26(4):540-547. doi: 10.1111/hdi.13029. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Short Daily Hemodialysis with Physidia S System: Clinical Performance Assessment during the Training Period.使用Physidia S系统进行每日短时血液透析的安全性和有效性:培训期间的临床性能评估
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 11;11(8):2123. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082123.
3
Hemodialysis With the Quanta SC+: Efficacy and Safety of a Self-care Hemodialysis Machine.
与高通量血液透析相比,在线大容量血液透析滤过是否具有更高的效率和可持续性?基于真实世界数据的详细模拟分析。
Clin Kidney J. 2024 May 10;17(6):sfae147. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae147. eCollection 2024 Jun.
使用Quanta SC+进行血液透析:一款自我护理血液透析机的疗效与安全性
Kidney Med. 2020 Nov-Dec;2(6):724-731.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
Intensive Home Hemodialysis Survival Comparable to Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.家庭强化血液透析的生存率与 deceased 供体肾移植相当。 (注:这里“deceased”常见释义为“已故的”,在医学语境中可理解为“已死亡的供体” )
Kidney Int Rep. 2020 Jan 9;5(3):296-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2019.12.019. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
Intradialytic Hypotension: Mechanisms and Outcome.透析中低血压:机制与结果。
Blood Purif. 2020;49(1-2):158-167. doi: 10.1159/000503776. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
6
Safety and efficacy of the Tablo hemodialysis system for in-center and home hemodialysis.Tablo血液透析系统用于中心血液透析和家庭血液透析的安全性与有效性。
Hemodial Int. 2020 Jan;24(1):22-28. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12795. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
7
Human factors testing of the Quanta SC+ hemodialysis system: An innovative system for home and clinic use.夸塔SC+血液透析系统的人为因素测试:一种适用于家庭和诊所使用的创新系统。
Hemodial Int. 2019 Jul;23(3):306-313. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12757. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
8
Volume of urea cleared as a therapy dosing guide for more frequent hemodialysis.作为更频繁血液透析治疗剂量指南的尿素清除量。
Hemodial Int. 2019 Jan;23(1):42-49. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12692. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
9
Haemodialysis at home: review of current dialysis machines.家庭血液透析:当前透析机的综述。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 May;15(5):337-347. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1465817. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
10
Intensive hemodialysis-keeping the faith.强化血液透析——坚守信念。
Kidney Int. 2018 Jan;93(1):10-12. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.09.014.