Burchard Rene, Sayn Lukas, Schmidt Ricardo, Graw Jan A, Scheicher Thomas, Soost Christian, Gruenewald Armin
Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Lahn-Dill-Kliniken, 35683 Dillenburg, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 12;12(4):1472. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041472.
Surgical site infections (SSIs) have a significant impact on outcome associated with surgical treatment. Therefore, skin antisepsis has evolved as a standard preoperative procedure in the operating room to reduce the perioperative risk of an SSI. In their "Global Guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections", the World Health Organization (WHO) recommend the use of an agent with remanent additives and considers colored agents as helpful. However, colored and remanent disinfectants are not available in Germany. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether using a colored antiseptic solution increases the quality of preoperative skin antisepsis.
This study was designed as a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial. To examine the level of coverage of skin antisepsis, an appropriate virtual reality (VR) environment was generated. Participants could see a movable surgical clamp with a swab in their hand. When touching the skin, the participants recognized an optical change in the appearance of the skin: Using a colored antiseptic solution resulted in orange-colored skin. Using an uncolored agent, a shiny wet look was visible without a change in natural skin color.
Data of 141 participants (female: 61.0% ( = 86); mean age: 28 y (Range 18-58 y, SD = 7.53 y)) were included in the study. The level of disinfection coverage was higher in the group using the colored disinfectant. On average, 86.5% (sd = 10.0) of the leg skin was covered when a colored disinfectant was used, whereas only 73.9% (sd = 12.8) of the leg skin was covered when the participants had to use an uncolored agent ( < 0.001, effect size: = 0.56, = 0.24).
The use of an uncolored disinfectant leads to a lower surface coverage of the perioperative skin disinfection. Thus far, it is unclear whether using uncolored disinfectants is associated with higher risks for perioperative infections compared with the use of non-remanent disinfectants. Therefore, further research is necessary and current German guidelines should be re-evaluated accordingly.
手术部位感染(SSIs)对手术治疗的预后有重大影响。因此,皮肤消毒已发展成为手术室的一项标准术前程序,以降低围手术期发生手术部位感染的风险。世界卫生组织(WHO)在其“预防手术部位感染全球指南”中推荐使用含有残留添加剂的消毒剂,并认为有色消毒剂会有所帮助。然而,德国没有有色且有残留的消毒剂。本研究的目的是调查使用有色消毒溶液是否能提高术前皮肤消毒的质量。
本研究设计为一项随机、双盲对照试验。为了检查皮肤消毒的覆盖水平,创建了一个合适的虚拟现实(VR)环境。参与者可以看到手中拿着带有拭子的可移动手术钳。当接触皮肤时,参与者会注意到皮肤外观的光学变化:使用有色消毒溶液会使皮肤呈现橙色。使用无色消毒剂时,皮肤会呈现闪亮的湿润外观,而自然肤色不变。
141名参与者的数据(女性:61.0%(n = 86);平均年龄:28岁(范围18 - 58岁,标准差 = 7.53岁))纳入了研究。使用有色消毒剂的组消毒覆盖水平更高。使用有色消毒剂时,腿部皮肤平均覆盖率为86.5%(标准差 = 10.0),而参与者使用无色消毒剂时,腿部皮肤覆盖率仅为73.9%(标准差 = 12.8)(P < 0.001,效应量:Cohen's d = 0.56,95%CI = 0.24)。
使用无色消毒剂会导致围手术期皮肤消毒的表面覆盖率较低。到目前为止,与使用无残留消毒剂相比,使用无色消毒剂是否会增加围手术期感染的风险尚不清楚。因此,有必要进行进一步研究,并相应地重新评估当前的德国指南。