Suppr超能文献

通过磁共振成像评估的大型垂体腺瘤。

Large pituitary gland adenomas evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging.

作者信息

Kaufman B, Kaufman B A, Arafah B M, Roessmann U, Selman W R

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 1987 Oct;21(4):540-6. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198710000-00017.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomographic (CT) scanning, and angiography or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were used preoperatively to evaluate 16 surgically proven cases of sellar tumor with extrasellar extension. There were 15 pituitary tumors and 1 schwannoma. The capabilities of MRI in evaluating these tumors were compared with CT scanning and angiography. Bone destruction and tumor calcification were better detected by CT scanning than by MRI. MRI was as effective as CT scanning in detecting a cyst or variation in tumor consistency. Neither MRI nor CT scanning was capable of distinguishing specific tumor types. In every case, MRI was superior to CT scanning for delineating spatial relationships of the tumor to the 3rd ventricle, the optic apparatus, adjacent brain, and parasellar vasculature. Vessel encasement by tumor was clearly seen on MRI when there was no direct indication of this on other studies. Cavernous sinus invasion was not demonstrated by CT scanning, but was indicated by MRI in 5 cases and was surgically confirmed in 3. MRI can provide more precise spatial information on extrasellar tumor extension. Vascular encasement and cavernous sinus invasion may be determined preoperatively. Treatment expectations and operative approaches can be guided by this information. When MRI is available, it is the test of choice for the preoperative evaluation of patients with suspected large pituitary gland (sellar region) tumors. Contrast-enhanced CT scanning and angiography can be used as supplementary studies to add information inherently unique to these techniques.

摘要

术前采用磁共振成像(MRI)、计算机断层扫描(CT)以及血管造影或数字减影血管造影(DSA)对16例经手术证实的鞍区肿瘤伴鞍外扩展病例进行评估。其中有15例垂体瘤和1例神经鞘瘤。将MRI评估这些肿瘤的能力与CT扫描及血管造影进行了比较。CT扫描在检测骨破坏和肿瘤钙化方面比MRI更具优势。MRI在检测囊肿或肿瘤质地变化方面与CT扫描效果相当。MRI和CT扫描均无法区分特定的肿瘤类型。在每一例中,MRI在描绘肿瘤与第三脑室、视器、相邻脑区及鞍旁血管系统的空间关系方面均优于CT扫描。当其他检查无直接迹象显示肿瘤包绕血管时,MRI能清晰显示肿瘤对血管的包绕。CT扫描未显示海绵窦侵犯,但MRI显示5例有海绵窦侵犯,其中3例经手术证实。MRI能提供关于鞍外肿瘤扩展更精确的空间信息。术前可确定血管包绕和海绵窦侵犯情况。该信息可为治疗预期和手术入路提供指导。当有MRI检查时,它是疑似大垂体(鞍区)肿瘤患者术前评估的首选检查。增强CT扫描和血管造影可作为补充检查,以补充这些技术所特有的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验