• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下经皮消融治疗肾上腺转移瘤的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。

Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Ablation for Adrenal Metastases: A Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.

出版信息

J Ultrasound Med. 2023 Aug;42(8):1779-1788. doi: 10.1002/jum.16198. Epub 2023 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1002/jum.16198
PMID:36840701
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous ablation (US-PA) for adrenal metastases (AMs) using a meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase electronic databases was performed to identify studies on US-PA for AM. Seven studies published between January 2000 and August 2022 were analyzed, which resulted in a sample size of 140 patients. Both random effects and common effects meta-analysis models were used to analyze the following efficacy and safety outcomes: the first and secondary technical success rate, 1-year overall survival rates, 1-year local tumor control rate, incidence rate of intraoperative hypertensive crises, and major complications. The subgroup analysis was performed to explore the origin of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Among 140 patients from 7 studies included in this meta-analysis: 51 (36.43%) underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and 89 (63.57%) underwent microwave ablation (MWA). Pooled data analysis revealed that the first and secondary technical success rates were 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73-96) and 99% (95% CI, 96-100), the 1-year overall survival rate was 83% (95% CI, 71-93), the 1-year local tumor control rate was 83% (95% CI, 75-90), and the incidence rate of intraoperative hypertensive crises was 14% (95% CI, 8-20). The overall rate of major complications was 3.6%. In the subgroup analysis, lower heterogeneity was indicated to be associated with mean tumor size and ablation type.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that US-PA can be both effective and safe for AM in terms of overall survival, technical success rate, and local control for AM.

摘要

目的

通过荟萃分析评估超声引导经皮消融(US-PA)治疗肾上腺转移瘤(AMs)的疗效和安全性。

方法

系统检索 PubMed、Cochrane、Web of Science 和 Embase 电子数据库,以确定 US-PA 治疗 AM 的研究。分析了 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月期间发表的 7 项研究,共纳入 140 例患者。采用随机效应和固定效应荟萃分析模型分析以下疗效和安全性结局:首次和二次技术成功率、1 年总生存率、1 年局部肿瘤控制率、术中高血压危象发生率和主要并发症发生率。进行亚组分析以探讨异质性的来源。

结果

在纳入的 7 项荟萃分析研究中,共 140 例患者:51 例(36.43%)接受射频消融(RFA)治疗,89 例(63.57%)接受微波消融(MWA)治疗。汇总数据分析显示,首次和二次技术成功率分别为 85%(95%可信区间,73%-96%)和 99%(95%可信区间,96%-100%),1 年总生存率为 83%(95%可信区间,71%-93%),1 年局部肿瘤控制率为 83%(95%可信区间,75%-90%),术中高血压危象发生率为 14%(95%可信区间,8%-20%)。主要并发症总发生率为 3.6%。在亚组分析中,肿瘤平均大小和消融方式与较低的异质性相关。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,US-PA 治疗 AM 的总生存率、技术成功率和局部肿瘤控制率均较为有效和安全。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Ablation for Adrenal Metastases: A Meta-Analysis.超声引导下经皮消融治疗肾上腺转移瘤的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
J Ultrasound Med. 2023 Aug;42(8):1779-1788. doi: 10.1002/jum.16198. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
2
Image-guided radiofrequency ablation for adrenal metastatic tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.图像引导下射频消融治疗肾上腺转移瘤:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2023;40(1):2185575. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2185575.
3
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of adrenal metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center experience.经皮射频消融治疗肝细胞癌肾上腺转移瘤:单中心经验。
Cancer Imaging. 2019 Jun 26;19(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40644-019-0231-7.
4
Treatment outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus adrenalectomy for adrenal metastases: a retrospective comparative study.经皮射频消融与肾上腺切除术治疗肾上腺转移瘤的疗效比较:一项回顾性对比研究。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2020 Sep;43(9):1249-1257. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01212-w. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
5
Complication Rates and Risk of Recurrence After Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation and Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Liver Tumors: a Meta-analysis.经皮射频消融和微波消融治疗肝脏肿瘤的并发症发生率和复发风险:一项荟萃分析。
Acad Radiol. 2024 Apr;31(4):1288-1301. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.11.005. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
6
Image-Guided Percutaneous Ablation of Adrenal Metastases: A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.基于影像引导的肾上腺转移瘤经皮消融治疗:疗效和安全性的荟萃分析。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Apr;32(4):527-535.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.12.010. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
7
Comparison of microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微波消融与射频消融治疗肝细胞癌的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):264-272. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1562571. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
Percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation for adrenal tumours: a systematic review.经皮影像引导下射频消融治疗肾上腺肿瘤:系统评价。
Clin Radiol. 2021 Nov;76(11):829-837. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
9
Effectiveness and safety of CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of adrenal metastases.CT引导下经皮射频消融治疗肾上腺转移瘤的有效性和安全性。
Br J Radiol. 2018 May;91(1085):20170607. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170607. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
10
Evaluating the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for the treatment of adrenal metastasis.评估超声引导下经皮微波消融治疗肾上腺转移瘤的疗效和安全性。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2020 Sep;16(5):1088-1092. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1119_19.

引用本文的文献

1
Computed tomography-guided cryoablation in treating adrenal metastases: a retrospective single-center study.计算机断层扫描引导下冷冻消融治疗肾上腺转移瘤:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2025 Jul 8;31(4):372-376. doi: 10.4274/dir.2024.242956. Epub 2024 Oct 21.