Suppr超能文献

现实生活环境中药物流产期间疼痛及镇痛药使用情况的评估

Evaluation of Pain and Use of Analgesics during Medical Termination of Pregnancy in Real-Life Settings.

作者信息

Agostini Aubert, Miquel Laura, Herman-Demars Hélène, Frantz Sandrine, Sicot Marie

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, la Conception Hospital, Aix Marseille Université, 147 Boulevard Baille, 13005, Marseille, France.

Medical Department, Nordic Pharma SAS, Paris, France.

出版信息

Pain Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):563-574. doi: 10.1007/s40122-023-00477-2. Epub 2023 Feb 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Women frequently report pain associated with medical termination of pregnancy (MToP), and its management can differ largely between centres. This study aimed at evaluating in real-life settings pain related to MToP and its management in France.

METHODS

This was a non-interventional prospective, longitudinal study run in 23 centres between 2015 and 2016 that included 893 pregnant women. Pain was reported by women prior any curative analgesic intake (CAI) through a five-level Likert scale (absence, mild, moderated, severe, extreme). Modalities of analgesic prophylaxis prescription (APP) and intake (API) and CAI were collected. Risk factors were investigated using ordinal logistic regression (for pain) or logistic regression (for CAI) with stepwise selection of variables.

RESULTS

APP was prescribed to 657 (73.7%) women irrespective of the gestational age, among whom 386 (73.7%) took the treatment. Out of 740 women who documented their pain symptoms prior to any CAI, few declared no pain (n = 94, 12.7%) or intense pain (n = 88, 11.9%). The majority reported mild or moderate pain (n = 558, 75.4%). On multivariate analysis adjusted on gestational age, increasing initial [odds ratio (OR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.47] or total dose (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.26) of misoprostol taken were independent factors associated with risk of more pain. When adjusting for gestational age, initial dose of misoprostol (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.45-2.66) and pain experienced (OR 3.58, 95% CI 2.82-4.55) were significantly associated with higher risk of CAI while API (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.36; 0.75) was negatively associated.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the women received an APP, but not all used it. API and gestational age were not related to different risks of more pain following MToP, whereas history of at least one child showed a negative association. Higher doses of misoprostol were strongly associated with both pain and CAI. API was associated with a decreased risk of CAI.

摘要

引言

女性经常报告与药物流产相关的疼痛,而且不同医疗中心对其处理方式差异很大。本研究旨在评估法国实际临床环境中与药物流产相关的疼痛及其处理情况。

方法

这是一项非干预性前瞻性纵向研究,于2015年至2016年在23个医疗中心开展,纳入了893名孕妇。女性在服用任何治疗性镇痛药(CAI)之前,通过五级李克特量表(无、轻度、中度、重度、极重度)报告疼痛情况。收集了预防性镇痛药物处方(APP)、用药(API)及CAI的相关信息。采用有序逻辑回归(针对疼痛)或逻辑回归(针对CAI)逐步选择变量来研究危险因素。

结果

无论孕周如何,657名(73.7%)女性接受了APP,其中386名(73.7%)服用了该药物。在740名在服用任何CAI之前记录了疼痛症状的女性中,很少有人宣称无疼痛(n = 94,12.7%)或剧痛(n = 88,11.9%)。大多数人报告为轻度或中度疼痛(n = 558,75.4%)。在根据孕周进行调整的多因素分析中,米索前列醇初始剂量增加(比值比[OR] 1.25,95%置信区间[CI] 1.06 - 1.47)或总剂量增加(OR 1.15,95% CI 1.05 - (此处原文有误,应为1.26))是与疼痛加剧风险相关的独立因素。在根据孕周进行调整时,米索前列醇初始剂量(OR 1.69,95% CI 1.45 - 2.66)和所经历的疼痛(OR 3.58,95% CI 2.82 - 4.55)与CAI风险显著相关,而API(OR 0.52,95% CI 0.36;0.75)与之呈负相关。

结论

大多数女性接受了APP,但并非所有人都使用了。API和孕周与药物流产后疼痛加剧的不同风险无关,而至少有一个孩子的生育史呈负相关。较高剂量的米索前列醇与疼痛和CAI均密切相关。API与CAI风险降低相关。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Pain and Use of Analgesics during Medical Termination of Pregnancy in Real-Life Settings.
Pain Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):563-574. doi: 10.1007/s40122-023-00477-2. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
2
Efficacy of mifepristone - Prostaglandin analogue combination in medical termination of pregnancy up to and beyond 7 weeks of amenorrhea: The RYMMa study.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Nov;254:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
6
Medical management of unwanted pregnancy in France: modalities and outcomes. The aMaYa study.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Jan;184:13-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.10.025. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
10
Pain during medical abortion in early pregnancy in teenage and adult women.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Dec;99(12):1603-1610. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13920. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Pain management for medical abortion before 14 weeks' gestation: A systematic review.
Contraception. 2022 Dec;116:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
2
Pain during medical abortion in early pregnancy in teenage and adult women.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Dec;99(12):1603-1610. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13920. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
4
Assessment of pain during medical abortion with home use of misoprostol.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017 Jun;22(3):207-211. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2017.1315092. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
Pain during medical abortion: a multicenter study in France.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Nov;194:212-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.09.025. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
6
Pain during medical abortion, the impact of the regimen: a neglected issue? A review.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2014 Dec;19(6):404-19. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2014.950730. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
9
Ibuprofen and paracetamol for pain relief during medical abortion: a double-blind randomized controlled study.
Fertil Steril. 2009 May;91(5):1877-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.084. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
10
Treatment of pain during medical abortion.
Contraception. 2006 Jul;74(1):45-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.002. Epub 2006 May 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验