Suppr超能文献

与治疗性布洛芬镇痛相比,在早孕药物流产中使用预防性布洛芬镇痛:一项随机对照试验。

Prophylactic compared with therapeutic ibuprofen analgesia in first-trimester medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Gynuity Health Projects and Planned Parenthood of New York City, New York, New York 10010, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep;122(3):558-64. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829d5a33.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of two oral analgesic regimens in first-trimester medical abortion.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 250 participants undergoing first-trimester abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol at three clinics to two ibuprofen regimens: therapeutic (800 mg every 4-6 hours as needed for pain) or prophylactic (800 mg starting 1 hour before the misoprostol dose, then every 4-6 hours for 48 hours regardless of pain, then as needed). We asked each participant to record her maximum pain on a scale of 0-10 daily thereafter.

RESULTS

Of participants assigned to the prophylactic and therapeutic regimens, 111 of 123 (90%) and 117 of 127 (92%), respectively, provided follow-up data. More than 80% of the participants in each group complied with their assigned treatment. Participants in the prophylactic group used substantially more ibuprofen than those in the therapeutic group (median of nine and four tablets, respectively). The mean maximum pain score was 7.1 in the prophylactic group and 7.3 in the therapeutic group (standard deviations 2.5 and 2.2, respectively); the difference was not statistically significant (P=.87, adjusted for site). Duration of pain, verbal pain ratings reported at follow-up, and use of other analgesics did not differ significantly by group (all P>.05). No significant benefit of the prophylactic regimen was apparent in any population subgroup. Abortion failure and ibuprofen side effects in the two groups were similar.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence that prophylactic administration of ibuprofen reduces pain severity or duration in first-trimester medical abortion. The average pain severity experienced by participants using both regimens was high.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01457521.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

摘要

目的

比较两种口服镇痛方案在早孕药物流产中的效果。

方法

我们将在三家诊所进行米非司酮和米索前列醇早孕流产的 250 名参与者随机分为两组,分别接受布洛芬治疗方案:治疗性(疼痛时按需每 4-6 小时服用 800mg)或预防性(米索前列醇剂量前 1 小时开始服用 800mg,然后每 4-6 小时服用 48 小时,无论疼痛情况如何,然后按需服用)。此后,我们要求每位参与者每天记录其最大疼痛程度(0-10 分)。

结果

分别有 111 名(90%)和 117 名(92%)接受预防性和治疗性方案分配的参与者提供了随访数据。每组超过 80%的参与者都遵守了他们的治疗方案。预防性组的参与者比治疗性组的参与者使用了更多的布洛芬(中位数分别为 9 片和 4 片)。预防性组的平均最大疼痛评分是 7.1,治疗性组是 7.3(标准差分别为 2.5 和 2.2);差异无统计学意义(P=.87,调整了地点因素)。两组之间疼痛持续时间、随访时的口头疼痛评分以及其他镇痛药的使用没有显著差异(均 P>.05)。在任何人群亚组中,预防性方案都没有明显的获益。两组的流产失败和布洛芬副作用相似。

结论

我们没有发现预防性给予布洛芬可以减轻早孕药物流产中疼痛严重程度或持续时间的证据。使用两种方案的参与者的平均疼痛严重程度都很高。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,www.clinicaltrials.gov,NCT01457521。

证据水平

I。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验