Suppr超能文献

患者在接受认知行为失眠疗法治疗后的失眠严重程度指数评分能告诉我们什么?

What are patients completing Cognitive Behavioral Insomnia Therapy telling us with their post-treatment Insomnia Severity Index scores?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Canada.

Department of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Sleep Med. 2023 Mar;103:187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Cognitive Behavioral Insomnia Therapy (CBT-I) is the gold standard insomnia treatment and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a frequently used treatment outcome measure. The ISI has strong psychometric properties and is purported to measure perceived insomnia symptom severity. However, little is known about the factors that drive insomnia severity perception and the psychometric properties of the ISI post-CBT-I.

METHODS

Participants were treatment-seeking adults meeting DSM-5 Insomnia Disorder criteria (n = 203, ages 18-77, M = 45.95 years). Participants completed sleep and mood questionnaires, including the ISI, pre- and post-CBT-I. They completed daily Consensus Sleep Diaries each morning throughout two pre-treatment weeks, eight weeks of treatment and two weeks post-treatment. A hierarchical regression analysis examined what predicted post-CBT-I ISI scores and Cronbach's alpha was computed to examine post-treatment reliability of the ISI.

RESULTS

The regression analysis revealed that lower post-treatment ISI scores were associated with lower pre-treatment ISI, and greater decreases in fatigue and generalized anxiety symptoms. The model did not significantly improve when pre-treatment sleep effort or changes in sleep diary indices were added. The post-treatment ISI Cronbach's alpha was .88.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the ISI has been shown to have sound psychometric properties, clinicians should consider that post CBT-I ISI scores are not related to their sleep improvements. Instead, they seem to be related to whether patients perceive themselves as poor sleepers pre-treatment and whether they felt less tired and anxious after CBT-I. Researchers should consider the impact of factors other than sleep when using the ISI at post-treatment. Patients are telling us that CBT-I should focus on addressing symptoms of fatigue and general anxiety; perhaps CBT-I could be improved further to address these concerns more effectively.

SUMMARY

This investigation shows that when individuals are rating their symptom severity after CBT-I, they are also integrating how they felt before treatment and whether they experienced a change in their fatigue or anxiety.

摘要

研究目的

认知行为失眠疗法(CBT-I)是失眠治疗的金标准,而失眠严重程度指数量表(ISI)是一种常用的治疗效果衡量标准。ISI 具有很强的心理测量学特性,据说是用来衡量失眠症状严重程度的感知。然而,人们对驱动失眠严重程度感知的因素以及 CBT-I 后 ISI 的心理测量特性知之甚少。

方法

研究纳入了 203 名符合 DSM-5 失眠障碍标准的寻求治疗的成年人(年龄 18-77 岁,平均年龄 45.95 岁)。参与者在治疗前后填写了睡眠和情绪问卷,包括 ISI。在两个治疗前周、八周治疗和治疗后两周,他们每天早上都填写共识睡眠日记。采用分层回归分析来检验哪些因素预测了 CBT-I 后的 ISI 评分,同时计算 Cronbach's alpha 来检验 ISI 治疗后的可靠性。

结果

回归分析显示,治疗后 ISI 评分较低与治疗前 ISI 评分较低以及疲劳和广泛性焦虑症状的改善较大有关。当加入治疗前睡眠努力或睡眠日记指数的变化时,模型没有显著改善。治疗后 ISI 的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.88。

结论

尽管 ISI 已被证明具有良好的心理测量学特性,但临床医生应该注意到,CBT-I 后 ISI 评分与他们的睡眠改善无关。相反,它们似乎与患者治疗前对自己睡眠质量的感知以及治疗后是否感到疲劳和焦虑减轻有关。当在治疗后使用 ISI 时,研究人员应该考虑除睡眠之外的其他因素的影响。患者告诉我们,CBT-I 应该侧重于解决疲劳和广泛性焦虑症状;也许 CBT-I 可以进一步改进,以更有效地解决这些问题。

总结

本研究表明,当个体在 CBT-I 后评估自己的症状严重程度时,他们还会综合考虑治疗前的感受以及疲劳或焦虑是否有所改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验