Jefferies Benjamin J, Patel Lopa, Khanna Atul
Plastic Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Cureus. 2023 Jan 26;15(1):e34231. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34231. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Background Pretibial lacerations are common injuries that have a significant yet underestimated association with morbidity and mortality. Although they may occur in any age group, they are commonly followed by an often relatively minor trauma in elderly and frail patients. The six-month mortality among such patients may be more than double the age group average. Currently, 5.2 in 1000 patients per year present to the emergency departments in UK hospitals due to pretibial lacerations. The associated acute admissions have a high financial cost. Despite the significant disease burden, there is a paucity of evidence on the optimal management of such injuries. This study aimed to describe the typical demographic and injury factors of individuals presenting to two district general hospitals, as well as their subsequent management and referral. Methodology Relevant patients were identified through NHS coding searches. Subsequently, it was found that 99 patients presented to an NHS trust with pretibial lacerations throughout 2020. A retrospective manual evaluation of clinical documentation was performed to identify the details of the patients' injury, management, referral, and demographics. Results The patients had a mean age of 55.4 (SD 28.3), and 56.6% were female. The most commonly presenting mechanism of injury was direct blunt trauma. The majority of cases were solely managed and discharged directly by the emergency department (74.8%). Of the 99 patients, 25 (25.3%) were referred to specialist services, 12 (12.1%) were managed conservatively, and 13 (13.1%) underwent operative intervention. The mean length of stay for those referred was 5.9 days, and the mean for the same was greater for those managed conservatively compared to those managed operatively (9.0 vs. 2.6 days). Among patients discharged by the emergency department, the most common method of wound closure was steristrips (n = 40; 54.1%), followed by conservative management with dressings (n = 22; 29.7%), sutures (n = 10, 13.5%) and glue (n = 5; 6.8%). Conclusions Overall, this study showed that the majority of patients presenting with pretibial lacerations have minor wounds that can be effectively managed in the emergency department. However, those with considerably more injuries should be provided an early referral to specialist services, where they would ideally receive early surgery and comprehensive follow-up.
胫前撕裂伤是常见损伤,与发病率和死亡率存在显著但被低估的关联。尽管任何年龄组都可能发生,但在老年和体弱患者中,此类损伤通常继发于相对较小的创伤。这类患者的六个月死亡率可能是该年龄组平均水平的两倍多。目前,英国医院急诊科每年有千分之5.2的患者因胫前撕裂伤前来就诊。相关的急性住院治疗费用高昂。尽管疾病负担沉重,但关于此类损伤的最佳管理的证据却很少。本研究旨在描述到两家地区综合医院就诊的患者的典型人口统计学和损伤因素,以及他们随后的治疗和转诊情况。
通过英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)编码搜索确定相关患者。随后发现,2020年有99名患者因胫前撕裂伤就诊于一家NHS信托机构。对临床文档进行回顾性人工评估,以确定患者损伤、治疗、转诊和人口统计学的详细信息。
患者的平均年龄为55.4岁(标准差28.3),56.6%为女性。最常见的损伤机制是直接钝性创伤。大多数病例由急诊科单独处理并直接出院(74.8%)。在99名患者中,25名(25.3%)被转诊至专科服务,12名(12.1%)接受保守治疗,13名(13.1%)接受手术干预。转诊患者的平均住院时间为5.9天,保守治疗患者的平均住院时间(9.0天)比手术治疗患者(2.6天)更长。在急诊科出院的患者中,最常见的伤口闭合方法是使用皮肤胶贴(n = 40;54.1%),其次是使用敷料进行保守治疗(n = 22;29.7%)、缝合(n = 10;13.5%)和胶水(n = 5;6.8%)。
总体而言,本研究表明,大多数胫前撕裂伤患者的伤口较小,可在急诊科得到有效处理。然而,那些损伤较为严重的患者应尽早转诊至专科服务,理想情况下他们应接受早期手术和全面随访。