• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单节段腰椎峡部裂性椎体滑脱患者不同手术方式的趋势:一项全国性登记分析

Trends of Different Surgical Approaches in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: A National Registry Analysis.

作者信息

Sharma Mayur, Jain Nikhil, Wang Dengzhi, Ugiliweneza Beatrice, Boakye Maxwell

机构信息

Neurosurgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, USA.

Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jan 25;15(1):e34194. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34194. eCollection 2023 Jan.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.34194
PMID:36843733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9951818/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A variety of surgical approaches (anterior vs. posterior vs. anterior and posterior) are available for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis (IS). The aim of our study was to analyze the pattern and 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing different surgical approaches for single-level IS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried using the ICD-9/10 and CPT 4 edition, from 2012 to 2020. We included patients 18-65 years of age who underwent spine fusions for IS. Outcomes were a length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, 30-day complications, hospital readmission, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Of 1036 patients who underwent spine fusions for IS, 838 patients (80.8%) underwent posterior only, 115 patients (11.1%) underwent anterior-only fusions and the rest (8%) underwent combined anterior and posterior procedures. 60% of patients in the posterior-only cohort had at least one comorbidity compared to 54% of patients in anterior only and 55% of patients in the combined cohort. No statistically significant differences in terms of LOS (3 days each) and discharge to home (96% vs. 93% vs. 94%) were noted among the anterior-only, posterior-only and combined cohorts, p> 0.05. In terms of 30-day complication rates, combined procedures had slightly higher rates (13%) compared to anterior (10%) or posterior-only (9%) procedures.

CONCLUSION

Posterior-only fusions were performed in 80% of patients with IS. No differences in terms of LOS, discharge disposition to home, 30-day complications, hospital readmission and reoperation rates were noted across the cohorts.

摘要

背景

对于峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症(IS),有多种手术入路可供选择(前路、后路、前后联合)。我们研究的目的是分析接受不同手术入路治疗单节段IS患者的手术方式及30天的预后情况。

材料与方法

使用ICD - 9/10和CPT第4版,查询2012年至2020年的国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库。我们纳入了18至65岁因IS接受脊柱融合术的患者。观察指标包括住院时间(LOS)、出院去向、30天并发症、再次入院情况及并发症发生率。

结果

在1036例因IS接受脊柱融合术的患者中,838例(80.8%)仅接受了后路手术,115例(11.1%)仅接受了前路融合术,其余(8%)接受了前后联合手术。仅接受后路手术组60%的患者至少有一种合并症,仅接受前路手术组为54%,联合手术组为55%。在仅接受前路、仅接受后路和联合手术组之间,住院时间(均为3天)和出院回家比例(分别为96%、93%、94%)方面未观察到统计学显著差异,p>0.05。在30天并发症发生率方面,联合手术组(13%)略高于前路手术组(10%)或仅后路手术组(9%)。

结论

80%的IS患者接受了仅后路融合术。各队列在住院时间、出院回家情况、30天并发症、再次入院及再次手术率方面未观察到差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9b5/9951818/7130b346444f/cureus-0015-00000034194-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9b5/9951818/7130b346444f/cureus-0015-00000034194-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9b5/9951818/7130b346444f/cureus-0015-00000034194-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends of Different Surgical Approaches in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: A National Registry Analysis.单节段腰椎峡部裂性椎体滑脱患者不同手术方式的趋势:一项全国性登记分析
Cureus. 2023 Jan 25;15(1):e34194. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34194. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Modified-frailty index does not independently predict complications, hospital length of stay or 30-day readmission rates following posterior lumbar decompression and fusion for spondylolisthesis.改良衰弱指数不能独立预测腰椎滑脱后路减压融合术后并发症、住院时间或 30 天再入院率。
Spine J. 2021 Nov;21(11):1812-1821. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 May 16.
3
Patient- and hospital-related risk factors for non-routine discharge after lumbar decompression and fusion for spondylolisthesis.腰椎滑脱后路减压融合术后非常规出院的患者和医院相关危险因素。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Oct;209:106902. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106902. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
4
Frailty is an important predictor of 30-day morbidity in patients treated for lumbar spondylolisthesis using a posterior surgical approach.衰弱是采用后路手术方法治疗腰椎滑脱症患者30天发病率的重要预测指标。
Spine J. 2022 Feb;22(2):286-295. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
5
Effects of preoperative nutritional status on complications and readmissions after posterior lumbar decompression and fusion for spondylolisthesis: A propensity-score analysis.后路腰椎减压融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症患者术前营养状况对并发症和再入院的影响:倾向评分分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Dec;211:107017. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107017. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
6
Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.I度退行性腰椎滑脱症的微创与开放融合手术:质量结果数据库分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17188.
7
Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-day Complications After Spine Surgery?美国外科医师学院风险计算器能否预测脊柱手术后 30 天的并发症?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 May 1;45(9):621-628. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003340.
8
Thirty-day readmission and reoperation after surgery for spinal tumors: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.脊柱肿瘤手术后30天再入院及再次手术:一项国家外科质量改进计划分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Aug;41(2):E5. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.FOCUS16168.
9
Short-term outcomes following posterior cervical fusion among octogenarians with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a NSQIP database analysis.80 岁以上伴有颈椎病脊髓病的患者行颈椎后路融合术后的短期转归:NSQIP 数据库分析。
Spine J. 2018 Sep;18(9):1603-1611. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
10
Trends and Long-term Health Care Utilization of Computer-assisted Neuronavigation in Spine Fusions: An Exact Matched Analysis of National Administrative Database.脊柱融合中计算机辅助神经导航的趋势和长期医疗保健利用:国家行政数据库的精确匹配分析。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Oct;166:e850-e858. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.116. Epub 2022 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Analysis of Revision Rates in Surgical Treatments for Lumbar Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.腰椎峡部裂性脊柱滑脱症手术治疗翻修率的比较分析
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar 12:21925682251326914. doi: 10.1177/21925682251326914.
2
Standalone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Without Supplementary Posterior Fixation Is Effective for Treatment of Symptomatic Grade 1 Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.单纯前路腰椎椎间融合术不附加后路固定治疗有症状的Ⅰ度峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症是有效的。
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Dec 5;18(6):721-30. doi: 10.14444/8663.
3
Prospective Assessment of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) in Spondylolisthesis: A Radiological and Functional Outcome Study in an Indian Population.

本文引用的文献

1
Isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults… A review of the current literature.成人峡部裂性腰椎滑脱症……当前文献综述。
J Clin Neurosci. 2022 Jul;101:124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.04.042. Epub 2022 May 18.
2
ALIF Versus TLIF for L5-S1 Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: ALIF Demonstrates Superior Segmental and Regional Radiographic Outcomes and Clinical Improvements Across More Patient-reported Outcome Measures Domains.ALIF 与 TLIF 治疗 L5-S1 峡部裂性滑脱:ALIF 在更多患者报告结局测量领域显示出更优的节段和区域影像学结果和临床改善。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Jun 1;47(11):808-816. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004333. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
3
腰椎滑脱症经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)的前瞻性评估:一项针对印度人群的影像学和功能结局研究。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 26;16(8):e67880. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67880. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Surgical Restoration of Sagittal Alignment of the Spine: Correlation with Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
脊柱矢状位平衡的手术重建:与改善患者报告结局的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JBJS Rev. 2020 Aug;8(8):e1900100. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00100.
4
Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Combined Anterior-Posterior Approach Versus Posterior Alone in Management of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.前后联合入路与单纯后路治疗峡部裂性腰椎滑脱的功能和影像学结果:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Jun 30;13(3):230-238. doi: 10.14444/6031. eCollection 2019 Jun.
5
Risk factors of instrumentation failure and pseudarthrosis after stand-alone L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective cohort study.单纯 L5-S1 前路腰椎体间融合术后内固定失败和假关节形成的危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 May 31;31(3):338-346. doi: 10.3171/2019.3.SPINE181476. Print 2019 Sep 1.
6
Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life after decompression surgery without fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.矢状位脊柱骨盆对线对腰椎管狭窄减压不融合手术后临床疗效及健康相关生活质量的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jan 25;30(4):470-475. doi: 10.3171/2018.10.SPINE181094. Print 2019 Apr 1.
7
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion System for High-Grade Spondylolisthesis Using "Reverse Bohlman Technique": A Technical Report and Overview of the Literature.使用“反向博尔曼技术”的高级别腰椎滑脱骶髂关节融合系统:技术报告及文献综述
World Neurosurg. 2019 Apr;124:331-339. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.041. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
A systematic review of clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.成人峡部裂性脊柱滑脱症手术治疗的临床疗效的系统评价
Spine J. 2018 Aug;18(8):1441-1454. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 May 7.
9
Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis.环形融合:前路腰椎间融合术联合后路经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定与经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗 L5-S1 峡部裂性腰椎滑脱的对比分析。
Spine J. 2018 Mar;18(3):464-471. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.227. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
10
Guideline summary review: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.指南简要综述:成人峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症诊断与治疗的循证临床指南
Spine J. 2016 Dec;16(12):1478-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.08.034. Epub 2016 Sep 1.