Deconstructing the Meaning of Multidisciplinary Cancer Care: A mixed-method study of patients and providers.
作者信息
Rendell Victoria R, Ricker Melissa M, Winslow Emily R
机构信息
Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisc.
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisc.
出版信息
Oncol Issues. 2022;37(2):52-64. doi: 10.1080/10463356.2021.2008592. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Deconstructing the Meaning of Multidisciplinary Cancer Care: A mixed-method study of patients and providers.解构多学科癌症护理的意义：一项针对患者和医护人员的混合方法研究。
Oncol Issues. 2022;37(2):52-64. doi: 10.1080/10463356.2021.2008592. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
2
Patient Participation in Multidisciplinary Tumor Conferences from the Providers' Perspective: Is It Feasible in Routine Cancer Care?从医疗服务提供者角度看患者参与多学科肿瘤会议：在常规癌症护理中是否可行？
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Nov 27;13:1729-1739. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S283166. eCollection 2020.
3
Perspectives on Palliative Care in Cancer Clinical Trials: Diverse Meanings from Multidisciplinary Cancer Care Providers.癌症临床试验中姑息治疗的观点：来自多学科癌症护理提供者的不同含义。
J Palliat Med. 2018 May;21(5):616-621. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0445. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
4
Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences: Providers' perceptions of patients' need satisfaction and emotional experiences.患者参与多学科肿瘤会议：提供者对患者需求满足和情感体验的看法。
Psychooncology. 2020 Aug;29(8):1263-1271. doi: 10.1002/pon.5413. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
5
Deconstructing the placebo effect and finding the meaning response.解构安慰剂效应并找到意义反应。
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Mar 19;136(6):471-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-6-200203190-00011.
6
Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumour conferences in breast cancer care (PINTU): a mixed-methods study protocol.患者参与乳腺癌多学科肿瘤会议（PINTU）：一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 8;9(4):e024621. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024621.
7
Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences in breast and gynecological cancer care: How patient-centered is the communication?患者参与乳腺癌和妇科癌症护理的多学科肿瘤会议：沟通的以患者为中心程度如何？
Psychooncology. 2022 Sep;31(9):1597-1606. doi: 10.1002/pon.5999. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
8
Opportunities and limitations of shared decision making in multidisciplinary tumor conferences with patient participation - A qualitative interview study with providers.有患者参与的多学科肿瘤会议中共享决策的机会和局限性 - 提供者的定性访谈研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Apr;104(4):792-799. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
9
[The Hospice-Care Promotion Experiences of Multidisciplinary Care Providers in Residential Long-Term Care Facilities: A Qualitative Study].[长期居住护理机构中多学科护理人员的临终关怀促进经验：一项定性研究]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2022 Oct;69(5):34-43. doi: 10.6224/JN.202210_69(5).06.
10
A Multidisciplinary Toxicity Team for Cancer Immunotherapy-Related Adverse Events.癌症免疫治疗相关不良反应的多学科毒性小组。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jun 1;17(6):712-720. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7268.
本文引用的文献
1
Benefits, barriers and opinions on multidisciplinary team meetings: a survey in Swedish cancer care.多学科团队会议的益处、障碍及看法：瑞典癌症护理领域的一项调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 5;18(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2990-4.
2
The multidisciplinary team meeting in the UK from the patients' perspective: comments and observations from cholangiocarcinoma patients and their families.从患者角度看英国的多学科团队会议：胆管癌患者及其家属的意见与观察
Int J Gen Med. 2017 Sep 18;10:305-310. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S145029. eCollection 2017.
3
Pathways to Lung Cancer Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study of Patients and General Practitioners about Diagnostic and Pretreatment Intervals.肺癌诊断途径：一项关于诊断和治疗前间隔的患者和全科医生的定性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 May;14(5):742-753. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201610-817OC.
4
Patients' experiences with continuity of cancer care in Canada: Results from the CanIMPACT study.加拿大癌症护理连续性患者体验：CanIMPACT研究结果
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Oct;62(10):821-827.
5
Using Experience-Based Design to Improve the Care Experience for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Dec;12(12):e1035-e1041. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.011213. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
6
The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: A systematic review of the literature.多学科团队会议对肿瘤学环境中患者评估、管理和结局的影响：文献系统评价。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jan;42:56-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
7
Do Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) processes influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer? A population-based experience.多学科团队（MDT）流程是否会影响结直肠癌患者的生存率？一项基于人群的经验。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 13;15:686. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1683-1.
8
Is it worth reorganising cancer services on the basis of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs)? A systematic review of the objectives and organisation of MDTs and their impact on patient outcomes.基于多学科团队（MDTs）重组癌症服务是否值得？对多学科团队的目标、组织及其对患者预后的影响进行的系统评价。
Health Policy. 2015 Apr;119(4):464-74. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
9
Tumor boards: optimizing the structure and improving efficiency of multidisciplinary management of patients with cancer worldwide.肿瘤多学科会诊：优化全球癌症患者多学科管理的结构并提高效率
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014:e461-6. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2014.34.e461.
10
Hospital-community interface: a qualitative study on patients with cancer and health care providers' experiences.医院-社区接口：一项关于癌症患者和医疗保健提供者体验的定性研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Oct;17(5):528-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
Zotero 插件