Faculty of Health Sciences, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Department of Physical Therapy for Neurology, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2024 Jul;40(7):1412-1420. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2182655. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
Many non-pharmacological interventions have been proposed for spasticity modulation in spastic stroke subjects.
To investigate the immediate effect of dry needling (DN), electrical stimulation (ES), and dry needling with intramuscular electrical stimulation (DN+IMES) on H-reflex in post-stroke spasticity.
Spastic subjects with stroke (N = 90) (55-85 years) were evaluated after 1 month of stroke onset using Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score ≥1. Subjects were randomly allocated to receive one session of DN - Soleus (N = 30), ES - posterior lateral side of the leg with 100 Hz and 250 μs pulse width (N = 30), or DN+IMES - Soleus (N = 30). MAS, H-reflex, maximum latency, H-amplitude, M-amplitude and H/M ratio, were recorded before and after one session of intervention. Relationships for each variable within group or the difference among groups were calculated by effect size.
Significant decrease in H/M ratio in Gastrocnemius and Soleus at post-treatment within DN group ( = .024 and = .029, respectively), large effect size ( = 0.07 and 0.62, respectively); and DN+IMES group ( = .042 and = .001, respectively), large effect size ( = 0.69 and 0.71, respectively). No significant differences in all variables at pre-treatment and post-treatment was recorded among ES, DN, and DN+IMES groups. Significant decrease in MAS was recorded at post-treatment compared to pre-treatment within ES group ( = .002), DN group ( = .0001), and DN+IMES group ( = .0001), but not significant ( > .05) among three groups at pre-treatment ( = .194) and post-treatment ( = .485).
Single session of DN, ES, and the DN+IMES can significantly modulate post-stroke spasticity by possible bottom-up regulation mechanisms.
许多非药物干预措施已被提出用于调节痉挛性卒中患者的痉挛。
研究干针(DN)、电刺激(ES)和肌内电刺激(DN+IMES)对卒中后痉挛性 H 反射的即刻影响。
卒中后痉挛患者(N=90)(55-85 岁)在卒中发作后 1 个月内根据改良 Ashworth 量表(MAS)评分≥1 进行评估。患者随机分为接受 1 次 DN-比目鱼肌(N=30)、ES-腿后外侧 100Hz 和 250μs 脉冲宽度(N=30)或 DN+IMES-比目鱼肌(N=30)。在干预后,记录 MAS、H 反射、最大潜伏期、H 波幅度、M 波幅度和 H/M 比。计算每组内各变量的关系或组间差异。
DN 组中治疗后腓肠肌和比目鱼肌的 H/M 比值显著下降(=0.024 和=0.029,分别),效应量较大(=0.07 和 0.62,分别);DN+IMES 组(=0.042 和=0.001,分别),效应量较大(=0.69 和 0.71,分别)。ES、DN 和 DN+IMES 组在治疗前和治疗后所有变量均无显著差异。ES 组、DN 组和 DN+IMES 组治疗后与治疗前相比,MAS 显著下降(=0.002)、DN 组(=0.0001)和 DN+IMES 组(=0.0001),但三组在治疗前(=0.194)和治疗后(=0.485)差异均无统计学意义(>0.05)。
单次 DN、ES 和 DN+IMES 可通过可能的下行调节机制显著调节卒中后痉挛。