• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

OCT 指导 vs. 完全 PCI 在伴有 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和多支血管病变的患者中:OCT-CONTACT RCT。

OCT guided vs. COmplete pci in patieNts with sT segment elevation myocArdial infarCtion and mulTivessel disease: OCT-CONTACT RCT.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, Turin, Italy -

Division of Cardiology, Città della Salute e Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Minerva Cardiol Angiol. 2023 Aug;71(4):431-437. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.22.06144-0. Epub 2023 Feb 27.

DOI:10.23736/S2724-5683.22.06144-0
PMID:36847434
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular death. However, the management of non-culprit lesions in patients with the multivessel disease remains a matter of debate in this setting. It's still unclear if a morphological OCT-guided approach, identifying coronary plaque instability, may provide a more specific treatment compared with a standard angiographic/functional approach.

METHODS

OCT-Contact is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Patients with STEMI with successful primary PCI of the culprit lesion will be enrolled after the index PCI. Patients will be deemed eligible if a critical coronary lesion other than the culprit (associated with a diameter of stenosis ≥50%) will be identified during the index angiography. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to OCT-guided PCI of non-culprit lesions (Group A) vs. complete PCI (Group B). PCI in group A will be undertaken according to criteria of plaque vulnerability, while in group B the use of fractional flow reserve will be left at the operators' discretion. Major-adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) are a composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) (excluding peri-procedural MI), unplanned revascularization, and NYHA IV heart failure) will be the primary efficacy outcome. Single components of MACE along with cardiovascular mortality will be the secondary endpoints. . Safety endpoints will embrace worsening of renal failure, procedural complications, and bleedings. Patients will be followed for 24 months after randomization.

RESULTS

A sample size of 406 patients (203 per group) is required to provide the analysis an 80% power to detect a non-inferiority in the primary endpoint with an alpha error set at 0.05 and a non-inferiority limit of 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

A morphological OCT-guided approach may be a more specific treatment compared with the standard angiographic/functional approach in non-culprit lesions of STEMI patients.

摘要

背景

在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中,罪犯病变的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)显著降低了心血管死亡风险。然而,多支血管病变患者的非罪犯病变的处理在这种情况下仍存在争议。目前尚不清楚形态学 OCT 指导的方法,识别冠状动脉斑块不稳定,是否与标准的血管造影/功能方法相比提供更具针对性的治疗。

方法

OCT-Contact 是一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、非劣效性随机对照试验。在成功进行罪犯病变的直接 PCI 后,将 STEMI 患者纳入研究。如果在指数血管造影期间发现除罪犯病变(与狭窄程度≥50%相关)以外的临界冠状动脉病变,则患者符合入选标准。患者将以 1:1 的比例随机分为 OCT 指导的非罪犯病变 PCI 组(A 组)和完全 PCI 组(B 组)。A 组 PCI 将根据斑块易损性标准进行,而 B 组将根据操作者的判断使用血流储备分数。主要不良心血管事件(MACE)是全因死亡率、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)(不包括围手术期 MI)、计划外血运重建和纽约心脏协会(NYHA)IV 级心力衰竭的复合终点。MACE 的单一成分以及心血管死亡率是次要终点。安全性终点包括肾功能恶化、手术并发症和出血。患者将在随机分组后随访 24 个月。

结果

需要 406 例患者(每组 203 例)的样本量,才能在主要终点检测到非劣效性,具有 80%的功效,α误差设定为 0.05,非劣效性限值为 4%。

结论

与标准血管造影/功能方法相比,形态学 OCT 指导的方法在 STEMI 患者的非罪犯病变中可能是一种更具针对性的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
OCT guided vs. COmplete pci in patieNts with sT segment elevation myocArdial infarCtion and mulTivessel disease: OCT-CONTACT RCT.OCT 指导 vs. 完全 PCI 在伴有 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和多支血管病变的患者中:OCT-CONTACT RCT。
Minerva Cardiol Angiol. 2023 Aug;71(4):431-437. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.22.06144-0. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
2
Complete Revascularization Versus Culprit Lesion Only in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: A DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Substudy.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死伴多支血管病变患者完全血运重建与罪犯病变血运重建的比较:DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI 心脏磁共振子研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 22;12(8):721-730. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.248.
3
Compared Outcomes of ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Multivessel Disease Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Preserved Fractional Flow Reserve of Nonculprit Lesions Treated Conservatively and of Those With Low Fractional Flow Reserve Managed Invasively: Insights From the FLOWER-MI Trial.比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗多支血管病变伴非罪犯病变保留血流储备分数患者与保守治疗低血流储备分数患者的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的结局:来自 FLOWER-MI 试验的见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov;14(11):e011314. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011314. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
4
Rationale and design of the Flow Evaluation to Guide Revascularization in Multivessel ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FLOWER-MI) trial.血流评估指导多支 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死血运重建(FLOWER-MI)试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2020 Apr;222:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.12.015. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
5
Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete Revascularization Improves the Prognosis in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Severe Nonculprit Disease: A DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI Substudy (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization).血流储备分数指导下的完全血运重建改善 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并严重非罪犯病变患者的预后:DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI 子研究(ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:仅治疗罪犯病变还是完全血运重建)
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004460.
6
Angiography-guided Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Ischemia-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Medical Therapy in the Management of Significant Disease in Non-Infarct-related Arteries in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease.在多支冠状动脉疾病的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,非梗死相关动脉严重病变管理中血管造影引导下多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与缺血引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗及药物治疗的比较
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2018 Jun;17(2):77-82. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000144.
7
Complete revascularization based on angiography derived fractional flow reserve versus incomplete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.基于血管造影衍生的血流储备分数的完全血运重建与 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的不完全血运重建。
Cardiol J. 2024;31(2):226-234. doi: 10.5603/cj.92762. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
8
FFR-Guided Complete or Culprit-Only PCI in Patients with Myocardial Infarction.FFR 引导的心肌梗死患者完全血运重建或罪犯病变血运重建。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 25;390(16):1481-1492. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2314149. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
9
Timing of fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: Rationale and design of the OPTION-STEMI trial.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的血流储备分数指导下完全血运重建的时机:OPTION-STEMI 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2024 Jul;273:35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.03.017. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
10
Complete vs Culprit-Lesion-Only Revascularization for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.直接血运重建与罪犯血管血运重建治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Aug 1;5(8):881-888. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1251.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison between Imaging and Physiology in Guiding Coronary Revascularization: A Meta-Analysis.影像学与生理学在指导冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 24;13(9):2504. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092504.