Mailli Leto, Patel Shyamal, Das Raj, Chun Joo Young, Renani Seyed, Das Sourav, Ratnam Lakshmi
Department of Interventional Radiology, St George's University Hospital, London, UK.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's University Hospital, London, UK.
CVIR Endovasc. 2023 Feb 27;6(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s42155-023-00353-2.
Uterine artery embolisation is well established as a treatment for symptomatic fibroids, however, there remain some uncertainties. We have carried out a focused literature review on three particularly challenging aspects - post-procedure fertility, symptomatic adenomyosis and large volume fibroids and uteri, to enable operators to utilise evidence-based guidance in patient selection, consent, and management.
Literature searches were performed of the PubMed/Medline, Google scholar, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. The outcomes of our analysis of studies which recorded fertility rates in women desiring pregnancy following UAE for symptomatic fibroids found an overall mean pregnancy rate of 39.4%, live birth rate of 69.2% and miscarriage rate of 22%. The major confounding factor was patient age with many studies including women over 40 years who already have lower fertility compared to younger cohorts. Miscarriage rates and pregnancy rates in the studies analysed were comparable to the age matched population. Treatment of pure adenomyosis and adenomyosis with co-existing uterine fibroids with UAE has been shown to produce symptomatic improvement with better outcomes in those with combined disease. Although the effectiveness is not as high as it is in pure fibroid disease, UAE provides a viable and safe alternative for patients seeking symptom relief and uterine preservation. Our analysis of studies assessing the outcomes of UAE in patients with large volume uteri and giant fibroids (> 10 cm) demonstrate no significant difference in major complication rates demonstrating that fibroid size should not be a contraindication to UAE.
Our findings suggest uterine artery embolisation can be offered to women desiring pregnancy with fertility and miscarriage rates comparable to that of the age-matched general population. It is also an effective therapeutic option for symptomatic adenomyosis as well as for the treatment of large fibroids > 10 cm in diameter. Caution is advised in those with uterine volumes greater than 1000cm. It is however clear that the quality of evidence needs to be improved on with an emphasis on well-designed randomised controlled trials addressing all three areas and the consistent use of validated quality of life questionnaires for outcome assessment to enable effective comparison of outcomes in different studies.
子宫动脉栓塞术作为有症状子宫肌瘤的一种治疗方法已得到充分确立,然而,仍存在一些不确定性。我们针对三个特别具有挑战性的方面进行了重点文献综述——术后生育能力、症状性子宫腺肌病以及大体积肌瘤和子宫,以使手术医生能够在患者选择、知情同意和管理中运用循证指南。
对PubMed/Medline、谷歌学术、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库进行了文献检索。我们对记录有症状子宫肌瘤患者接受子宫动脉栓塞术(UAE)后有妊娠意愿女性的生育率的研究分析结果发现,总体平均妊娠率为39.4%,活产率为69.2%,流产率为22%。主要混杂因素是患者年龄,许多研究纳入了40岁以上的女性,与年轻人群相比,她们的生育能力本来就较低。所分析研究中的流产率和妊娠率与年龄匹配人群相当。已表明,用UAE治疗单纯子宫腺肌病以及合并子宫肌瘤的子宫腺肌病可使症状改善,合并疾病患者的效果更好。尽管有效性不如单纯肌瘤疾病高,但UAE为寻求症状缓解和保留子宫的患者提供了一种可行且安全的选择。我们对评估大体积子宫和巨大肌瘤(>10厘米)患者UAE结局的研究分析表明,主要并发症发生率无显著差异,这表明肌瘤大小不应成为UAE的禁忌证。
我们的研究结果表明,对于有妊娠意愿的女性,子宫动脉栓塞术的生育和流产率与年龄匹配的普通人群相当。它也是症状性子宫腺肌病以及直径>10厘米的大肌瘤治疗的一种有效治疗选择。对于子宫体积大于1000立方厘米的患者建议谨慎使用。然而,显然需要提高证据质量,重点是针对所有这三个领域设计良好的随机对照试验,并持续使用经过验证的生活质量问卷进行结局评估,以便能够有效比较不同研究的结局。