Suppr超能文献

[不同级别医院儿科重症监护病房小儿感染性休克的诊断与治疗]

[Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric septic shock in pediatric intensive care units from hospitals of different levels].

作者信息

Wang Z H, Liu G, Fan C N, Wang X D, Liu X H, Su J, Gao H M, Qian S Y, Li Z, Cheng Y B

机构信息

Baoding Research Laboratory of Pediatric Severe Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Baoding Children's Hospital, Baoding 071051, China.

Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing 100045, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Mar 2;61(3):209-215. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20221028-00916.

Abstract

To investigate the differences in clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric septic shock in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) among hospitals of different levels. This retrospective study enrolled 368 children with septic shock treated in the PICU of Beijing Children's Hospital, Henan Children's Hospital, and Baoding Children's Hospital from January 2018 to December 2021. Their clinical data were collected, including the general information, location of onset (community or hospital-acquired), severity, pathogen positivity, consistence of guideline (the rate of standard attainment at 6 h after resuscitation and the rate of anti-infective drug administration within 1 h after diagnosis), treatment, and in-hospital mortality. The 3 hospitals were national, provincial, and municipal, respectively. Furthermore, the patients were divided into the tumor group and the non-tumor group, and into the in-hospital referral group and the outpatient or emergency admission group. Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney test were used to analyze the data. The 368 patients aged 32 (11, 98) months, of whom 223 were males and 145 females. There were 215, 107, and 46 patients with septic shock, with males of 141, 51, and 31 cases, from the national, provincial, and municipal hospitals, respectively. The difference in pediatric risk of mortality Ⅲ (PRISM Ⅲ) scores among the national,provincial and municipal group was statistically significant (26(19, 32) 19(12, 26) 12(6, 19), =60.25,<0.001). The difference in community acquired septic shock among the national,provincial and municipal group was statistically significant (31.6%(68/215) 84.1%(90/107) 91.3%(42/46), χ=108.26,<0.001). There were no significant differences in compliance with guidelines among the 3 groups (>0.05). The main bacteria detected in the national group were (15.4% (12/78)) and (15.4% (12/78)); in the provincial group were (19.0% (12/63)) and (12.7% (8/63)), and in the municipal group were (40.0% (10/25)) and (16.0% (4/25)). The difference in the proportion of virus and the proportion of 3 or more initial antimicrobials used among the national,provincial and municipal group was statistically significant (27.7% (43/155) 14.9% (13/87) 9.1% (3/33), 22.8%(49/215) 11.2%(12/107) 6.5%(3/46), χ=8.82, 10.99, both <0.05). There was no difference in the in-hospital mortality among the 3 groups (>0.05). Regarding the subgroups of tumor and non-tumor, the national group had higher PRISM Ⅲ (31(24, 38) 22 (21, 28) 16 (9, 22), 24 (18, 30) 17(8, 24) 10 (5, 16), =30.34, 10.45, both <0.001), and it was the same for the subgroups of in-hospital referral and out-patient or emergency admission (29 (21, 39) 23 (17, 30) 15 (10, 29), 23 (17, 29) 18 (10, 24) 11 (5, 16), =20.33, 14.25, both <0.001) as compared to the provincial and municipal group. There was no significant difference in the in-hospital mortality among the 2 pairs of subgroups (all >0.05). There are differences in the severity, location of onset, pathogen composition, and initial antibiotics of pediatric septic shock in children's hospitals of different levels, but no differences in compliance with guidelines and in-hospital survival rate.

摘要

调查不同级别医院儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中儿童感染性休克的临床特征、诊断和治疗差异。本回顾性研究纳入了2018年1月至2021年12月在北京儿童医院、河南省儿童医院和保定市儿童医院PICU接受治疗的368例感染性休克患儿。收集他们的临床资料,包括一般信息、发病部位(社区获得性或医院获得性)、严重程度、病原体阳性情况、指南依从性(复苏后6小时达标率及诊断后1小时内抗菌药物使用率)、治疗情况及住院死亡率。这3家医院分别为国家级、省级和市级医院。此外,将患者分为肿瘤组和非肿瘤组,以及院内转诊组和门诊或急诊入院组。采用卡方检验和曼 - 惠特尼检验分析数据。368例患者年龄为32(11,98)个月,其中男性223例,女性145例。国家级、省级和市级医院感染性休克患者分别有215例、107例和46例,男性分别为141例、51例和31例。国家级、省级和市级组儿童死亡风险Ⅲ(PRISMⅢ)评分差异有统计学意义(26(19,32)、19(12,26)、12(6,19),χ² = 60.25,P < 0.001)。国家级、省级和市级组社区获得性感染性休克差异有统计学意义(31.6%(68/215)、84.1%(90/107)、91.3%(42/46),χ² = 108.26,P < 0.001)。3组间指南依从性差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。国家级组主要检出的细菌为[具体细菌1](15.4%(12/78))和[具体细菌2](15.4%(12/78));省级组为[具体细菌3](19.0%(12/63))和[具体细菌4](12.7%(8/63)),市级组为[具体细菌5](40.0%(10/25))和[具体细菌6](16.0%(4/25))。国家级、省级和市级组病毒比例及初始使用3种或更多抗菌药物比例差异有统计学意义(27.7%(43/155)、14.9%(13/87)、9.1%(3/33),22.8%(49/215)、11.2%(12/107)、6.5%(3/46),χ² = 8.82、10.99,均P < 0.05)。3组间住院死亡率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。在肿瘤组和非肿瘤亚组中,国家级组PRISMⅢ评分更高(31(24,38)、22(21,28)、16(9,22),24(18,30)、17(8,24)、10(5,16),χ² = 30.34、10.45,均P < 0.001),院内转诊组和门诊或急诊入院亚组与省级和市级组相比情况相同(29(21,39)、23(17,30)、15(10,29),23(17,29) 18(10,24)、11(5,16),χ² = 20.33、14.25,均P < 0.001)。2对亚组间住院死亡率差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。不同级别儿童医院儿童感染性休克的严重程度、发病部位、病原体构成及初始抗生素存在差异,但指南依从性和院内生存率无差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验