• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节翻修术的二期中,扩大转子下截骨术是一种安全的手术:文献系统综述。

Extended trochanteric osteotomy is a safe procedure in two-stage hip revision: a systematic review of the literature.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Turin, CTO, Via Zuretti 29, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Istituto Ortopedico del Mezzogiorno d'Italia "Franco Scalabrino", Via Consolare Pompea, 98100, Messina, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):2695-2702. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03497-y. Epub 2023 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00590-023-03497-y
PMID:36849679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10504093/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) has proved to be an effective technique in complicated stem removal in femoral aseptic loosening or periprosthetic fracture. Debate remains about its safety in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The primary aim of this study is to analyze the ETO reinfection and union rate in two-stage hip revision.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed regarding all studies reporting ETO outcomes in the two-stage revision for hip PJI up to October 2022, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. A literature search was conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE/EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Quality assessment of the articles was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies. This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews. Patient demographic, clinical, and surgical data were collected.

RESULTS

This systematic review included and analyzed nine clinical studies with a total of 382 ETO PJI hips in two-stage revision. The overall ETO reinfection rate was 8.9% (34 hips), consistent with the reinfection rate after two-stage revision in patients without ETO. The overall ETO union rate was 94.8% (347 hips), comparable to the ETO union rate in non-septic patients. Compared between a group of patients with ETO PJI and a group of patients with non-PJI ETO, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications, both septic and aseptic, and for postoperative HHS.

CONCLUSION

ETO proved to be a safe and effective procedure in PJI revisions. It may be a viable option in challenging femoral stem removal during the two-stage hip revision in PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

摘要

背景

延长转子截骨术(ETO)已被证明是治疗股骨无菌性松动或假体周围骨折时复杂的假体取出的有效技术。但其在假体周围感染(PJI)中的安全性仍存在争议。本研究的主要目的是分析在二期髋关节翻修中,ETO 的再感染和愈合率。

材料和方法

根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目标准,对截至 2022 年 10 月所有报告髋关节 PJI 二期翻修中 ETO 结果的研究进行了系统文献回顾。在以下数据库中进行了文献检索:MEDLINE/EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Cochrane。使用非随机研究方法学指数对文章进行质量评估。本系统评价已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库中注册。收集患者的人口统计学、临床和手术数据。

结果

本系统评价纳入并分析了 9 项临床研究,共涉及 382 例二期翻修中 ETO 感染的 PJI 髋关节。总的 ETO 再感染率为 8.9%(34 髋),与未行 ETO 的二期翻修患者的再感染率一致。总的 ETO 愈合率为 94.8%(347 髋),与非感染患者的 ETO 愈合率相当。与 PJI 患者的 ETO 组和非 PJI 患者的 ETO 组相比,术后并发症(包括感染和非感染)和术后 HHS 无显著差异。

结论

ETO 被证明是 PJI 翻修的一种安全有效的方法。在 PJI 二期髋关节翻修中,对于股骨假体取出困难的病例,ETO 可能是一种可行的选择。

证据水平

IV。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4db0/10504093/250770116938/590_2023_3497_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4db0/10504093/250770116938/590_2023_3497_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4db0/10504093/250770116938/590_2023_3497_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Extended trochanteric osteotomy is a safe procedure in two-stage hip revision: a systematic review of the literature.髋关节翻修术的二期中,扩大转子下截骨术是一种安全的手术:文献系统综述。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):2695-2702. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03497-y. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
2
Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature.一期翻修治疗膝关节假体周围感染后复发性感染的特征:文献系统评价。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):2703-2715. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03480-7. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
3
Periprosthetic shoulder infection management: one-stage should be the way: a systematic review and meta-analysis.人工肩关节周围感染的管理:一期手术应为首选方式:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Mar;33(3):722-737. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.09.007. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
4
Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis.单动、双动及大股骨头全髋关节置换术的翻修及脱位风险:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Apr;28(3):445-455. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2073-y. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
5
Re-Infection Outcomes Following One- And Two-Stage Surgical Revision of Infected Knee Prosthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.感染性膝关节假体一期和二期手术翻修后的再感染结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 11;11(3):e0151537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151537. eCollection 2016.
6
Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.全髋关节置换术中双动组件的疗效:文献系统评价
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1):11-19. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0462.R1.
7
Does the Degree of Liner Constraint Increase Risk of Complications in Articulating Spacers in Two-stage Revision After THA?在全髋关节置换术后二期翻修中,线性约束程度会增加可活动间隔器并发症的风险吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 24;483(7):1237-44. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003489.
8
Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for the early prosthetic joint infection of total knee and hip arthroplasties: a systematic review.清创术、抗生素和植入物保留(DAIR)治疗全膝关节和髋关节置换术后早期假体关节感染:系统评价。
J ISAKOS. 2024 Feb;9(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
9
The effect of bearing surface on risk of periprosthetic joint infection in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.关节表面对全髋关节置换术中假体周围关节感染风险的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Feb;100-B(2):134-142. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B2.BJJ-2017-0575.R1.
10
The autoclaving and re-implantation of an infected prosthesis as a spacer during resection knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.关节置换术中切除感染假体后,使用高压蒸汽灭菌和再植入作为间隔物:一项系统评价。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2022 Jun;106(2):111-125. doi: 10.1007/s12306-021-00722-x. Epub 2021 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of modular stem for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture: a systematic review of the literature.模块化柄治疗人工关节周围股骨骨折的疗效:文献系统综述
Ann Jt. 2023 Aug 1;8:40. doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-27. eCollection 2023.
2
A Rare Case of Open (Gustilo II) Periprosthetic Fracture (Vancouver B2) in a Polytraumatized Patient.一名多发伤患者发生开放性( Gustilo II型)假体周围骨折(温哥华B2型)的罕见病例。
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023;11(11):717-720. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.71540.3342.

本文引用的文献

1
Is augmentation the best solution in partial anterior cruciate ligament tears? A literature systematic review and meta-analysis.在部分前交叉韧带撕裂中,增强术是最佳解决方案吗?一项文献系统综述与荟萃分析。
J Orthop. 2022 Dec 12;36:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.11.018. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Could anterior closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy be a viable option in patients with high posterior tibial slope who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.对于接受前交叉韧带重建术的胫骨后倾角较高的患者,前侧闭合楔形胫骨高位截骨术是否可行?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Aug;33(6):2201-2214. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03419-4. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
3
The Impact of Exchanging Cerclage Fixation after Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.
翻修全髋关节置换术治疗人工关节周围感染中转子下截骨延长术后更换环扎固定的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Feb;38(2):367-371. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.041. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
4
What Is the Outcome of the First Revision Procedure of Primary THA for Osteoarthritis? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.初次全髋关节置换术治疗骨关节炎的翻修结果如何?来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1952-1970. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002339. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
5
Is the Revision Rate for Femoral Neck Fracture Lower for Total Hip Arthroplasty Than for Hemiarthroplasty?: A Comparison of Registry Data for Contemporary Surgical Options.全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的翻修率是否低于半髋关节置换术?当代手术选择的登记数据比较
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Sep 7;104(17):1530-1541. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01256. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
6
Comparison of Functional and Radiographic Outcomes Between Two Fixation Methods for Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.两种固定方法在翻修全髋关节置换术中延长转子间截骨术的功能和影像学结果比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Sep;37(9):1844-1850. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.04.012. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
7
Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review.髋关节翻修术中大转子延长截骨术:病例系列研究及系统文献综述
Arthroplasty. 2022 Apr 3;4(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s42836-022-00115-w.
8
Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy with Intermediate Resection Arthroplasty Is Safe for Use in Two-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Infection.大转子延长截骨联合中间切除关节成形术用于感染性全髋关节置换二期翻修手术是安全的。
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 22;11(1):36. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010036.
9
Survivorship and clinical outcomes of proximal femoral replacement in non-neoplastic primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.非肿瘤性原发性和翻修全髋关节置换术中近端股骨置换的生存和临床结果:系统评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Nov 8;22(Suppl 2):933. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04711-w.
10
Periprosthetic joint infection rates across primary total hip arthroplasty surgical approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 653,633 procedures.全髋关节置换术不同手术入路的假体周围关节感染率:653633 例手术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Oct;142(10):2965-2977. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04186-3. Epub 2021 Sep 30.