Erkmen Berrak, Ozdogan Adem, Ezdesir Ayhan, Celik Gokhan
SOCAR Turkey R&D and Innovation Inc., SOCAR Turkey, Izmir 35800, Turkey.
Refinery and Petrochemicals Business Unit, SOCAR Turkey, Izmir 35800, Turkey.
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Feb 9;15(4):859. doi: 10.3390/polym15040859.
Plastics are engineering marvels that have found widespread use in all aspects of modern life. However, poor waste management practices and inefficient recycling technologies, along with their extremely high durability, have caused one of the major environmental problems facing humankind: waste plastic pollution. The upcycling of waste plastics to chemical feedstock to produce virgin plastics has emerged as a viable option to mitigate the adverse effects of plastic pollution and close the gap in the circular economy of plastics. Pyrolysis is considered a chemical recycling technology to upcycle waste plastics. Yet, whether pyrolysis as a stand-alone technology can achieve true circularity or not requires further investigation. In this study, we analyzed and critically evaluated whether oil obtained from the non-catalytic pyrolysis of virgin polypropylene (PP) can be used as a feedstock for naphtha crackers to produce olefins, and subsequently polyolefins, without undermining the circular economy and resource efficiency. Two different pyrolysis oils were obtained from a pyrolysis plant and compared with light and heavy naphtha by a combination of physical and chromatographic methods, in accordance with established standards. The results demonstrate that pyrolysis oil consists of mostly cyclic olefins with a bromine number of 85 to 304, whereas light naphtha consists of mostly paraffinic hydrocarbons with a very low olefinic content and a bromine number around 1. Owing to the compositional differences, pyrolysis oil studied herein is completely different than naphtha in terms of hydrocarbon composition and cannot be used as a feedstock for commercial naphtha crackers to produce olefins. The findings are of particular importance to evaluating different chemical recycling opportunities with respect to true circularity and may serve as a benchmark to determine whether liquids obtained from different polyolefin recycling technologies are compatible with existing industrial steam crackers' feedstock.
塑料是工程学上的奇迹,在现代生活的各个方面都有广泛应用。然而,糟糕的废物管理做法和低效的回收技术,再加上其极高的耐用性,导致了人类面临的一个主要环境问题:废塑料污染。将废塑料升级转化为化学原料以生产原生塑料,已成为减轻塑料污染负面影响和缩小塑料循环经济差距的可行选择。热解被认为是一种将废塑料升级转化的化学回收技术。然而,热解作为一种独立技术能否实现真正的循环利用,还需要进一步研究。在本研究中,我们分析并批判性地评估了从原生聚丙烯(PP)的非催化热解中获得的油是否可以用作石脑油裂解装置的原料来生产烯烃,进而生产聚烯烃,同时又不损害循环经济和资源效率。从一个热解工厂获得了两种不同的热解油,并根据既定标准,通过物理和色谱方法相结合的方式,与轻质和重质石脑油进行了比较。结果表明,热解油主要由溴值为85至304的环状烯烃组成,而轻质石脑油主要由烯烃含量极低、溴值约为1的链烷烃组成。由于成分差异,本文研究的热解油在烃类组成方面与石脑油完全不同,不能用作商业石脑油裂解装置生产烯烃的原料。这些发现对于评估不同化学回收机会在真正循环利用方面的情况尤为重要,并且可以作为一个基准,以确定从不同聚烯烃回收技术中获得的液体是否与现有的工业蒸汽裂解装置的原料兼容。