Ipanaqué-Zapata Miguel, Figueroa-Quiñones Joel, Bazalar-Palacios Janina, Arhuis-Inca Wendy, Quiñones-Negrete Magaly, Villarreal-Zegarra David
Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.
Escuela Profesional de Psicología, Universidad Peruana Unión, Tarapoto, Peru.
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 16;9(3):e13770. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13770. eCollection 2023 Mar.
The aims of the study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and to characteristics of a scale on research skills as well as to characterize the experience of university thesis students using information databases (i.e., Scopus or Web of Science) and bibliographic reference managers.
A sample of 1598 university students from five departments, acroos the different campuses of one Peruvian university. The psychometric properties of the instrument were evaluated using factor analysis and measurement invariance according to sex and age groups. In addition, an internal consistency analysis was conducted for scale reliability using Cronbach's alpha, ordinal alpha, and the omega index.
Our study identified that the unidimensional model with correlated errors showed adequate indicators of reliability and goodness of fit, with the exception of the RMSEA, which shows values higher than 0.08. Measurement invariance by sex and age group was present. The majority of university students in E-learning showed use of the bibliographic manager Mendeley (52.13%), low ability to use information databases such as Scopus (22.24%) or Web of Science (17.26%), and the least skilled research skills were in formulating the problem, objectives, and hypotheses (51.63%) and carrying out data analysis and processing using statistical techniques (49.37%).
The conclusions of the study were that the 8-item research skills instrument presents acceptable psychometric indicators in Peruvian university students in thesis courses. Likewise, a scarce use of global databases, the approach to the research topic, and carrying out its statistical processing.
本研究旨在评估一项关于研究技能量表的心理测量特性和特征,并描述大学毕业论文学生使用信息数据库(即Scopus或Web of Science)和文献参考管理工具的体验。
从秘鲁一所大学不同校区的五个系抽取了1598名大学生作为样本。使用因子分析和根据性别及年龄组的测量不变性来评估该工具的心理测量特性。此外,使用克朗巴哈α系数、顺序α系数和欧米伽指数进行内部一致性分析以评估量表的可靠性。
我们的研究发现,具有相关误差的单维模型显示出足够的可靠性和拟合优度指标,但均方根误差近似值(RMSEA)除外,其值高于0.08。存在按性别和年龄组的测量不变性。大多数参与电子学习的大学生使用文献管理工具Mendeley(52.13%),使用Scopus(22.24%)或Web of Science(17.26%)等信息数据库的能力较低,研究技能最欠缺的方面在于提出问题、目标和假设(51.63%)以及使用统计技术进行数据分析和处理(49.37%)。
该研究的结论是,这项包含8个条目的研究技能量表在秘鲁大学本科论文课程学生中呈现出可接受的心理测量指标。同样,全球数据库的使用较少,在研究课题的方法以及进行统计处理方面也存在不足。