Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Apr;34(4):888-897. doi: 10.1111/jce.15875. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The QDOT-MICRO™ catheter allows very high-power and short-duration (vHPSD) ablation. This study aimed to investigate lesion characteristics using different ablation settings.
Radiofrequency applications (90 W/4 s, temperature-control mode with 55°C or 60°C target) were performed in excised porcine myocardium using three different approaches: single (SA), double nonrepetitive (DNRA), and double repetitive applications (DRA). Applications were performed with an interval of 1 min for DNRA, and without interval for DRA.
A total of 480 lesions were analyzed. Lesion depth and volume were largest for DRA followed by DNRA and SA regardless of catheter direction (depth: 3.8 vs. 3.3 vs. 2.6 mm, p < .001 for all comparisons; volume: 176.6 vs. 145.1 vs. 97.0 mm , p < .001 for all comparisons). Surface area was significantly larger for DRA than for SA (45.1 vs. 38.3 mm , p < .001) and larger for DNRA than for SA (44.5 vs. 38.3 mm , p < .001), but was similar between DRA and DNRA (45.1 vs. 44.5 mm , p = .54). Steam-pops more frequently occurred for DRA than for SA (15.6% vs. 4.4%, p = .004) and DNRA (15.6% vs. 6.9%, p = .061), but the incidence was similar between SA and DNRA (4.4% vs. 6.9%, p = 1). Although surface area and lesion volume were larger in lesions with steam-pops than without steam-pops (46.5 vs. 38.1 mm , p = .018 and 128.3 vs. 96.8 mm , p = .068, respectively), lesions were not deeper (pop(+): 2.5 mm vs. pop(-): 2.6 mm, p = .75).
DNRA produces larger lesions than SA without increasing the risk of steam-pops. DRA produces the largest lesions among the three groups, but with an increased risk of steam-pops. Even with steam-pops, lesions do not become deeper in vHPSD ablation.
背景/目的:QDOT-MICRO 导管允许进行超高功率和短持续时间(vHPSD)消融。本研究旨在探讨不同消融设置下的病变特征。
在离体猪心肌中,使用三种不同方法进行射频应用(90W/4s,55°C 或 60°C 目标温度控制模式):单(SA)、双非重复(DNRA)和双重复应用(DRA)。对于 DNRA,应用之间间隔 1 分钟,而对于 DRA,则没有间隔。
共分析了 480 个病灶。无论导管方向如何,DRA 组的病灶深度和体积最大,其次是 DNRA 组和 SA 组(深度:3.8 与 3.3 与 2.6mm,p<0.001 均有差异;体积:176.6 与 145.1 与 97.0mm,p<0.001 均有差异)。DRA 组的表面积明显大于 SA 组(45.1 与 38.3mm,p<0.001),也大于 DNRA 组与 SA 组(44.5 与 38.3mm,p<0.001),但 DRA 组与 DNRA 组之间相似(45.1 与 44.5mm,p=0.54)。与 SA 组(4.4%)相比,DRA 组发生蒸汽弹出的频率更高(15.6%),与 DNRA 组(6.9%)相比,p=0.004),但与 SA 组相比,DNRA 组(15.6%)的发生率相似(6.9%),p=0.61)。然而,SA 组与 DNRA 组之间的发生率相似(4.4%)。与无蒸汽弹出的病灶相比,有蒸汽弹出的病灶的表面积和体积更大(46.5 与 38.1mm,p=0.018 和 128.3 与 96.8mm,p=0.068),但病灶并不更深(弹出(+):2.5mm 与弹出(-):2.6mm,p=0.75)。
DNRA 产生的病变比 SA 大,而不会增加蒸汽弹出的风险。DRA 在三组中产生最大的病变,但蒸汽弹出的风险增加。即使有蒸汽弹出,vHPSD 消融也不会使病变更深。