• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association of Evaluation and Management Payment Policy Changes With Medicare Payment to Physicians by Specialty.评估和管理支付政策变化与各专业医师向 Medicare 支付费用的关联。
JAMA. 2023 Feb 28;329(8):662-669. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.0879.
2
Reframing Medicare Physician Payment Policy for 2019: A Look at Proposed Policy.重新构建 2019 年医疗保险医师支付政策:政策建议观察
Pain Physician. 2018 Sep;21(5):415-432.
3
Associations Between the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Medicaid Primary Care Payment Increase and Physician Participation in Medicaid.《平价医疗法案》中医疗补助初级保健支付增加与医师参与医疗补助之间的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Aug 1;178(8):1042-1048. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2610.
4
Telemedicine Services Provided to Medicare Beneficiaries by Otolaryngologists Between 2010 and 2018.2010 年至 2018 年间耳鼻喉科医生向 Medicare 受益人为提供的远程医疗服务。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Sep 1;146(9):816-821. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1911.
5
Proposed Medicare Physician Payment Schedule for 2017: Impact on Interventional Pain Management Practices.2017年拟议的医疗保险医师支付计划:对介入性疼痛管理实践的影响。
Pain Physician. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(7):E935-55.
6
Medicare payments to the neurology workforce in 2012.2012年医疗保险向神经科医疗人员的支付情况。
Neurology. 2015 Apr 28;84(17):1796-802. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001515. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
7
Physician payment 2008 for interventionalists: current state of health care policy.2008年介入治疗医生的薪酬:医疗保健政策现状
Pain Physician. 2007 Sep;10(5):607-26.
8
9
Differences in the Complexity of Office Visits by Physician Specialty: NAMCS 2013-2016.按医生专业划分的门诊复杂性差异:2013 - 2016年全国门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1715-1720. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05624-0. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
10
Gender Differences in Physician Service Provision Using Medicare Claims Data.利用医疗保险理赔数据分析医生服务提供中的性别差异
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Jun;92(6):870-880. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The Pulse of Primary Care.基层医疗的脉搏。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09561-z.
2
Financial Impact of Medicare Payment Reform for E/M Visits on Compensation for Otolaryngologic Procedures in 2023.2023年医疗保险对门诊医疗服务支付改革对耳鼻喉科手术补偿的财务影响。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Apr;172(4):1281-1285. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1146. Epub 2025 Jan 26.
3
Concise Commentary: Welcome to Club MED-How the Proposed Diagnostic Entity "Mixed Esophageal Disease" Can Resolve Diagnosis Overload.简要评论:欢迎来到地中海俱乐部——拟议的诊断实体“混合性食管疾病”如何解决诊断过载问题。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Sep;68(9):3555-3556. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08041-w. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequency Of Indirect Billing To Medicare For Nurse Practitioner And Physician Assistant Office Visits.护士执业医师和医师助理的间接计费到医疗保险的频率。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Jun;41(6):805-813. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01968.
2
Early Changes in Billing and Notes After Evaluation and Management Guideline Change.评估和管理指南变更后的计费和记录早期变化。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):499-504. doi: 10.7326/M21-4402. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
3
Physician Practice Interruptions in the Treatment of Medicare Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间对 Medicare 患者治疗的医生执业中断。
JAMA. 2021 Oct 5;326(13):1325-1328. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16324.
4
Diabetes Care and Glycemic Control During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.美国在新冠疫情期间的糖尿病护理和血糖控制。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Oct 1;181(10):1412-1414. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.3047.
5
Variation In Telemedicine Use And Outpatient Care During The COVID-19 Pandemic In The United States.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间远程医疗使用和门诊护理的变化。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Feb;40(2):349-358. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01786.
6
Trends in Outpatient Care Delivery and Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US.美国新冠疫情期间门诊医疗服务与远程医疗的趋势
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;181(3):388-391. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5928.
7
Admissions to Veterans Affairs Hospitals for Emergency Conditions During the COVID-19 Pandemic.因 COVID-19 疫情而入住退伍军人事务部医院的急诊病人。
JAMA. 2020 Jul 7;324(1):96-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.9972.
8
Implications of Changes in Medicare Payment and Documentation for Primary Care Spending and Time Use.医疗保险支付与文件记录的变化对初级保健支出和时间利用的影响
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(3):836-839. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05857-4. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
9
Physician Organization and the Role of Workforce Turnover.医师组织与劳动力流动的作用。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Apr 21;172(8):568-570. doi: 10.7326/M19-2838. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
10
A Step toward Protecting Payments for Primary Care.迈向保护基层医疗支付的一步。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 7;380(6):507-510. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1810848.

评估和管理支付政策变化与各专业医师向 Medicare 支付费用的关联。

Association of Evaluation and Management Payment Policy Changes With Medicare Payment to Physicians by Specialty.

机构信息

University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Minneapolis.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA. 2023 Feb 28;329(8):662-669. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.0879.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2023.0879
PMID:36853249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9975918/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

US primary care physicians (PCPs) have lower mean incomes than specialists, likely contributing to workforce shortages. In 2021, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services increased payment for evaluation and management (E/M) services and relaxed documentation requirements. These changes may have reduced the gap between primary care and specialist payment.

OBJECTIVES

To simulate the effect of the E/M payment policy change on total Medicare physician payments while holding volume constant and to compare these simulated changes with observed changes in total Medicare payments and E/M coding intensity, before (July-December 2020) and after (July-December 2021) the E/M payment policy change.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective observational study of US office-based physicians who were in specialties with 5000 or more physicians billing Medicare and who had 50 or more fee-for-service Medicare visits before and after the E/M payment policy change.

EXPOSURES

E/M payment policy changes.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Outcomes included physician-level simulated volume-constant payment change, total observed Medicare payment change, and share of high-intensity (ie, level 4 or 5) E/M visits before and after the E/M payment policy change. For each specialty, the median change in each outcome was reported. The payment gap between primary care and specialty physicians was calculated as the difference between total Medicare payments to the median primary care and median specialty physician.

RESULTS

The study population included 180 624 physicians. Repricing 2020 services yielded a simulated volume-constant payment change ranging from a 3.3% (-$4557.0) decrease for the median radiologist to an 11.0% ($3683.1) increase for the median family practice physician. After the E/M payment change, the median high-intensity share of E/M visits increased for physicians of nearly all specialties, ranging from a -4.4 percentage point increase (dermatology) to a 17.8 percentage point increase (psychiatry). The median change in total Medicare payments by specialty ranged from -4.2% (-$1782.9) for general surgery to 12.1% ($3746.9) for family practice. From July-December 2020 to July-December 2021, the payment gap between the median primary care physician and the median specialist shrank by $825.1, from $40 259.8 to $39 434.7 (primary care, $41 193.3 in July-December 2020 and $45 962.4 in July-December 2021; specialist, $81 453.1 in July-December 2020 and $85 397.1 in July-December 2021)-a relative decrease of 2.0%.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among US office-based physicians receiving Medicare payments in 2020 and 2021, E/M payment policy changes were associated with changes in Medicare payment by specialty, although the payment gap between primary care physicians and specialists decreased only modestly. The findings may have been influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic, and further research in subsequent years is needed.

摘要

重要性

美国初级保健医生(PCP)的平均收入低于专家,这可能导致劳动力短缺。2021 年,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)增加了评估和管理(E/M)服务的支付,并放宽了文件要求。这些变化可能缩小了初级保健和专科医生支付之间的差距。

目的

在保持数量不变的情况下,模拟 E/M 支付政策变化对 Medicare 医生总支付的影响,并将这些模拟变化与 Medicare 总支付和 E/M 编码强度变化进行比较,这些变化是在 E/M 支付政策变化之前(2020 年 7 月至 12 月)和之后(2021 年 7 月至 12 月)观察到的。

设计、设置和参与者:对在美国进行办公室医疗的医生进行回顾性观察性研究,这些医生的专业领域有 5000 名或以上的医生向 Medicare 收费,并且在 E/M 支付政策变化之前和之后有 50 次或以上的按服务收费的 Medicare 就诊。

暴露

E/M 支付政策变化。

主要结果和措施

结果包括医生层面的模拟数量不变的支付变化、总观察到的 Medicare 支付变化,以及 E/M 支付政策变化前后高(即 4 级或 5 级)E/M 就诊的比例。对于每个专业,报告了每种结果的中位数变化。初级保健医生和专科医生之间的支付差距计算为中位数初级保健医生和中位数专科医生的 Medicare 总支付之间的差异。

结果

研究人群包括 180624 名医生。对 2020 年的服务进行重新定价,得出的模拟数量不变的支付变化范围从中位数放射科医生的 3.3%(减少$4557.0)到中位数家庭医生的 11.0%(增加$3683.1)。在 E/M 支付变化后,几乎所有专科医生的 E/M 就诊中高强度就诊的比例都有所增加,从皮肤科的-4.4 个百分点增加到精神病学的 17.8 个百分点。各专业的 Medicare 总支付中位数变化范围从普外科的-4.2%(减少$1782.9)到家庭医学的 12.1%(增加$3746.9)。从 2020 年 7 月至 12 月到 2021 年 7 月至 12 月,中位数初级保健医生和中位数专科医生之间的支付差距缩小了$825.1,从$40259.8 降至$39434.7(初级保健,2020 年 7 月至 12 月为$41193.3,2021 年 7 月至 12 月为$45962.4;专科,2020 年 7 月至 12 月为$81453.1,2021 年 7 月至 12 月为$85397.1)-相对减少了 2.0%。

结论和相关性

在接受 2020 年和 2021 年 Medicare 支付的美国办公室医生中,E/M 支付政策变化与专科医生的 Medicare 支付变化有关,尽管初级保健医生和专科医生之间的支付差距仅略有缩小。这一发现可能受到了 COVID-19 大流行的影响,未来几年还需要进一步研究。