Goodson John D, Shahbazi Sara, Rao Karthik, Song Zirui
Wang 625, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1715-1720. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05624-0. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
Specialty-to-specialty variation in use of outpatient evaluation and management service codes could lead to important differences in reimbursement among specialties.
To compare the complexity of visits to physicians whose incomes are largely dependent on evaluation and management services to the complexity of visits to physicians whose incomes are largely dependent on procedures.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 53,670 established patient outpatient visits reported by physicians in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 2013 to 2016. We defined high complexity visits as those with an above average number of diagnoses (> 2) and/or medications (> 3) listed We based our comparison on time intervals corresponding to typical outpatient evaluation and management times as defined by the Current Procedural Terminology Manual and specialty utilization of evaluation and management codes based on 2015 Medicare payments.
Proportion of complex visits by specialty category.
We found significant differences in the content of similar-length office visits provided by different specialties. For level 4 established outpatient visits (99214), the percentage involving high diagnostic complexity ranged from 62% for internal medicine, 52% for family medicine/general practice, and 41% for neurology (specialties whose incomes are largely dependent on evaluation and management codes), to 34% for dermatology, 42% for ophthalmology, and 25% for orthopedic surgery (specialties whose incomes are more dependent on procedure codes) (p value of the difference < 0.001). High medication complexity was found in the following proportions of visits: internal medicine 56%, family medicine/general practice 49%, and neurology 43%, as compared with dermatology 33%, ophthalmology 30%, and orthopedic surgery 30% (p value of the difference < 0.001).
Within the same duration visits, specialties whose incomes depend more on evaluation and management codes on average addressed more clinical issues and managed more medications than specialties whose incomes are more dependent on procedures.
门诊评估与管理服务代码在不同专科之间的使用差异可能导致各专科在报销方面存在重大差异。
比较收入主要依赖评估与管理服务的医生的就诊复杂性与收入主要依赖手术的医生的就诊复杂性。
设计、设置与参与者:我们分析了2013年至2016年期间医生在国家门诊医疗护理调查(NAMCS)中报告的53670例复诊患者门诊就诊情况。我们将高复杂性就诊定义为列出的诊断数量(>2个)和/或药物数量(>3种)高于平均水平的就诊。我们基于现行手术操作术语手册定义的典型门诊评估与管理时间对应的时间间隔以及基于2015年医疗保险支付情况的评估与管理代码专科使用情况进行比较。
各专科类别复杂就诊的比例。
我们发现不同专科提供的时长相似的门诊就诊内容存在显著差异。对于4级复诊门诊就诊(99214),涉及高诊断复杂性的百分比范围从内科的62%、家庭医学/全科的52%、神经科的41%(收入主要依赖评估与管理代码的专科),到皮肤科的34%、眼科的42%、整形外科的25%(收入更依赖手术代码的专科)(差异的p值<0.001)。发现高药物复杂性的就诊比例如下:内科56%、家庭医学/全科49%、神经科43%,而皮肤科为33%、眼科为30%、整形外科为30%(差异的p值<0.001)。
在相同时长的就诊中,收入更依赖评估与管理代码的专科平均比收入更依赖手术的专科处理更多临床问题并管理更多药物。