Suppr超能文献

按医生专业划分的门诊复杂性差异:2013 - 2016年全国门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)

Differences in the Complexity of Office Visits by Physician Specialty: NAMCS 2013-2016.

作者信息

Goodson John D, Shahbazi Sara, Rao Karthik, Song Zirui

机构信息

Wang 625, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1715-1720. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05624-0. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Specialty-to-specialty variation in use of outpatient evaluation and management service codes could lead to important differences in reimbursement among specialties.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the complexity of visits to physicians whose incomes are largely dependent on evaluation and management services to the complexity of visits to physicians whose incomes are largely dependent on procedures.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 53,670 established patient outpatient visits reported by physicians in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 2013 to 2016. We defined high complexity visits as those with an above average number of diagnoses (> 2) and/or medications (> 3) listed We based our comparison on time intervals corresponding to typical outpatient evaluation and management times as defined by the Current Procedural Terminology Manual and specialty utilization of evaluation and management codes based on 2015 Medicare payments.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

Proportion of complex visits by specialty category.

KEY RESULTS

We found significant differences in the content of similar-length office visits provided by different specialties. For level 4 established outpatient visits (99214), the percentage involving high diagnostic complexity ranged from 62% for internal medicine, 52% for family medicine/general practice, and 41% for neurology (specialties whose incomes are largely dependent on evaluation and management codes), to 34% for dermatology, 42% for ophthalmology, and 25% for orthopedic surgery (specialties whose incomes are more dependent on procedure codes) (p value of the difference < 0.001). High medication complexity was found in the following proportions of visits: internal medicine 56%, family medicine/general practice 49%, and neurology 43%, as compared with dermatology 33%, ophthalmology 30%, and orthopedic surgery 30% (p value of the difference < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Within the same duration visits, specialties whose incomes depend more on evaluation and management codes on average addressed more clinical issues and managed more medications than specialties whose incomes are more dependent on procedures.

摘要

背景

门诊评估与管理服务代码在不同专科之间的使用差异可能导致各专科在报销方面存在重大差异。

目的

比较收入主要依赖评估与管理服务的医生的就诊复杂性与收入主要依赖手术的医生的就诊复杂性。

设计、设置与参与者:我们分析了2013年至2016年期间医生在国家门诊医疗护理调查(NAMCS)中报告的53670例复诊患者门诊就诊情况。我们将高复杂性就诊定义为列出的诊断数量(>2个)和/或药物数量(>3种)高于平均水平的就诊。我们基于现行手术操作术语手册定义的典型门诊评估与管理时间对应的时间间隔以及基于2015年医疗保险支付情况的评估与管理代码专科使用情况进行比较。

主要结局与指标

各专科类别复杂就诊的比例。

关键结果

我们发现不同专科提供的时长相似的门诊就诊内容存在显著差异。对于4级复诊门诊就诊(99214),涉及高诊断复杂性的百分比范围从内科的62%、家庭医学/全科的52%、神经科的41%(收入主要依赖评估与管理代码的专科),到皮肤科的34%、眼科的42%、整形外科的25%(收入更依赖手术代码的专科)(差异的p值<0.001)。发现高药物复杂性的就诊比例如下:内科56%、家庭医学/全科49%、神经科43%,而皮肤科为33%、眼科为30%、整形外科为30%(差异的p值<0.001)。

结论

在相同时长的就诊中,收入更依赖评估与管理代码的专科平均比收入更依赖手术的专科处理更多临床问题并管理更多药物。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Physician Payment Disparities and Access to Services-a Look Across Specialties.医生薪酬差异与服务可及性——跨专业审视
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2649-2651. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05133-0. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
3
A Step toward Protecting Payments for Primary Care.迈向保护基层医疗支付的一步。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 7;380(6):507-510. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1810848.
8
Complexity of ambulatory care across disciplines.各学科门诊护理的复杂性。
Healthc (Amst). 2015 Jun;3(2):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
9
Patient-level medication regimen complexity in older adults with depression.老年抑郁症患者的个体用药方案复杂性
Clin Ther. 2014 Nov 1;36(11):1538-1546.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验