Suppr超能文献

预测急性胰腺炎并发持续性急性呼吸衰竭:两种肺损伤指数的准确性。

Predicting Persistent Acute Respiratory Failure in Acute Pancreatitis: The Accuracy of Two Lung Injury Indices.

机构信息

West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China-Liverpool Biomedical Research Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Jul;68(7):2878-2889. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07855-y. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Early and accurate identification of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) at high risk of persistent acute respiratory failure (PARF) is crucial. We sought to determine the accuracy of simplified Lung Injury Prediction Score (sLIPS) and simplified Early Acute Lung Injury (sEALI) for predicting PARF in ward AP patients.

METHODS

Consecutive AP patients in a training cohort from West China Hospital of Sichuan University (n = 912) and a validation cohort from The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (n = 1033) were analyzed. PARF was defined as oxygen in arterial blood/fraction of inspired oxygen < 300 mmHg that lasts for > 48 h. The sLIPS was composed by shock (predisposing condition), alcohol abuse, obesity, high respiratory rate, low oxygen saturation, high oxygen requirement, hypoalbuminemia, and acidosis (risk modifiers). The sEALI was calculated from oxygen 2 to 6 L/min, oxygen > 6 L/min, and high respiratory rate. Both indices were calculated on admission.

RESULTS

PARF developed in 16% (145/912) and 22% (228/1033) (22%) of the training and validation cohorts, respectively. In these patients, sLIPS and sEALI were significantly increased. sLIPS ≥ 2 predicted PARF in the training (AUROC 0.87, 95% CI 0.84-0.89) and validation (AUROC 0.81, 95% CI 0.78-0.83) cohorts. sLIPS was significantly more accurate than sEALI and current clinical scoring systems in both cohorts (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Using routinely available clinical data, the sLIPS can accurately predict PARF in ward AP patients and outperforms the sEALI and current existing clinical scoring systems.

摘要

背景/目的:早期准确识别急性胰腺炎(AP)患者中持续急性呼吸衰竭(PARF)的高危患者至关重要。我们旨在确定简化肺损伤预测评分(sLIPS)和简化早期急性肺损伤(sEALI)预测住院 AP 患者 PARF 的准确性。

方法

分析了来自四川大学华西医院的训练队列中的连续 AP 患者(n=912)和来自南昌大学第一附属医院的验证队列中的患者(n=1033)。PARF 定义为动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数<300 mmHg,持续时间>48 h。sLIPS 由休克(易患条件)、酗酒、肥胖、高呼吸频率、低氧饱和度、高氧需求、低白蛋白血症和酸中毒(风险修饰因子)组成。sEALI 由 2 至 6 L/min 的氧、>6 L/min 的氧和高呼吸率计算得出。这两个指标均在入院时计算。

结果

训练队列和验证队列中分别有 16%(145/912)和 22%(228/1033)的患者发生 PARF。在这些患者中,sLIPS 和 sEALI 明显升高。sLIPS≥2 预测了训练队列(AUROC 0.87,95%CI 0.84-0.89)和验证队列(AUROC 0.81,95%CI 0.78-0.83)中的 PARF。sLIPS 在两个队列中的准确性均明显优于 sEALI 和目前的临床评分系统(均 P<0.05)。

结论

使用常规临床数据,sLIPS 可准确预测住院 AP 患者的 PARF,且优于 sEALI 和目前的临床评分系统。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验