Imaging Factors Affecting Prenatal Counseling in Orofacial Clefts.

INTRODUCTION

We aim to correlate pre- and postnatal data regarding the cleft type and surgical prognostic factors associated to orofacial clefts.

METHODS

Retrospective study concerning all cases of orofacial cleft evaluated prenatally (US+/-MRI) between 2015 and 2020 with available postnatal outcomes. We compared prenatal imaging (cleft type and surgical prognostic factors) with postnatal findings.

RESULTS

48 fetuses were included. Median gestational age at first US/MRI examination: 29+2 WG and 31+6 WG, respectively. The prenatal diagnosis was in accordance with postnatal findings with regard to the cleft type in 88% of the cases (n = 42/48) for US and/or MRI, 84% (n = 38/45) for US only, and 90% (n = 37/41) for MRI only. The nasal septum deviation and nostril collapse were underestimated by prenatal US in 48% (n = 12/25) and 44% (n = 11/25) of cases, respectively (Cohen's kappa of 0.22 and 0.32, respectively). Pre- and postnatal examinations were in accordance with 75% of cases (n = 8) regarding evaluation of anteroposterior maxillary shift in case of unilateral alveolar cleft and in 90% and 80% of cases (n = 10) regarding the degree of protrusion/deviation of the premaxillary protrusion in case of bilateral cleft, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Prenatal imaging can accurately assess the type of orofacial cleft and evaluate maxillary shift and deviation of the premaxilla. It underestimates the nose deformity.