Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Department of Health Policy and Management, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York City, New York, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Oct;169(4):954-961. doi: 10.1002/ohn.308. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
To quantify the price that private payers pay hospitals for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatments and identify hospital-level factors associated with price variation.
Cross-sectional study.
Price transparency files.
Files from the top 50 hospitals in otolaryngology according to the US News and World Report were analyzed between December 2021 and June 2022. This study analyzed the following Food and Drug Administration-approved HNSCC therapies: pembrolizumab, nivolumab, cetuximab, cisplatin, carboplatin, and paclitaxel.
Twenty-four (48%) hospitals reported prices for at least 1 medication in our sample. Newer biologics were significantly more expensive than traditional chemotherapeutic agents. Given approved medication regimens, all biologics in our sample have similar annual costs. Price markups over acquisition costs ranged between 109% (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and 530% for carboplatin. Across hospitals, prices varied the most for paclitaxel, the cheapest medication in our sample, and prices varied the least for pembrolizumab the most expensive medication in our sample. Hospital 340B status and geographic location in the northeast/west are associated with lower price markups.
Price nondisclosure remains a significant problem among hospitals. Newer biological medications are more expensive when compared to traditional chemotherapeutic agents. Prices vary significantly across hospitals, with lower price markups observed in 340B hospitals as well as hospitals located in the geographic northeast and west. It remains to be seen if price transparency will lead to more uniform pricing or lower costs of treatments.
量化私人支付者为头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)治疗向医院支付的价格,并确定与价格变化相关的医院层面因素。
横断面研究。
价格透明度文件。
2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 6 月分析了根据《美国新闻与世界报道》排名前 50 的耳鼻喉科医院的文件。本研究分析了以下经食品和药物管理局批准的 HNSCC 疗法:派姆单抗、纳武单抗、西妥昔单抗、顺铂、卡铂和紫杉醇。
在我们的样本中,有 24 家(48%)医院报告了至少 1 种药物的价格。新型生物制剂明显比传统化疗药物昂贵。在我们的样本中,考虑到批准的药物治疗方案,所有生物制剂的年成本相似。收购成本的价格加成幅度在 109%(派姆单抗、纳武单抗)至 530%之间,适用于卡铂。在医院层面,我们样本中最便宜的药物紫杉醇的价格差异最大,而最昂贵的药物派姆单抗的价格差异最小。340B 计划医院和东北地区/西部地区的地理位置与较低的价格加成有关。
医院仍然存在严重的价格不透明问题。与传统化疗药物相比,新型生物制剂更昂贵。医院之间的价格差异很大,340B 计划医院以及东北地区/西部地区的医院观察到较低的价格加成。价格透明度是否会导致更统一的定价或治疗成本降低,还有待观察。