From the Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Murphy Institute of Political Economy, Tulane University, New Orleans (K.C.); the Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta (M.F.P., S.P.); and the Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco (J.A.S.).
N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 2;388(9):824-832. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2209197.
By the end of 2022, nearly 20 million workers in the United States have gained paid-sick-leave coverage from mandates that require employers to provide benefits to qualified workers, including paid time off for the use of preventive services. Although the lack of paid-sick-leave coverage may hinder access to preventive care, current evidence is insufficient to draw meaningful conclusions about its relationship to cancer screening.
We examined the association between paid-sick-leave mandates and screening for breast and colorectal cancers by comparing changes in 12- and 24-month rates of colorectal-cancer screening and mammography between workers residing in metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) that have been affected by paid-sick-leave mandates (exposed MSAs) and workers residing in unexposed MSAs. The comparisons were conducted with the use of administrative medical-claims data for approximately 2 million private-sector employees from 2012 through 2019.
Paid-sick-leave mandates were present in 61 MSAs in our sample. Screening rates were similar in the exposed and unexposed MSAs before mandate adoption. In the adjusted analysis, cancer-screening rates were higher among workers residing in exposed MSAs than among those in unexposed MSAs by 1.31 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 2.34) for 12-month colorectal cancer screening, 1.56 percentage points (95% CI, 0.33 to 2.79) for 24-month colorectal cancer screening, 1.22 percentage points (95% CI, -0.20 to 2.64) for 12-month mammography, and 2.07 percentage points (95% CI, 0.15 to 3.99) for 24-month mammography.
In a sample of private-sector workers in the United States, cancer-screening rates were higher among those residing in MSAs exposed to paid-sick-leave mandates than among those residing in unexposed MSAs. Our results suggest that a lack of paid-sick-leave coverage presents a barrier to cancer screening. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute.).
截至 2022 年底,美国近 2000 万名工人获得了带薪病假覆盖,这是雇主向符合条件的工人提供福利的要求,包括为使用预防服务提供带薪休假。尽管缺乏带薪病假覆盖可能会阻碍获得预防保健,但目前的证据不足以得出关于其与癌症筛查关系的有意义结论。
我们通过比较居住在受带薪病假授权影响的大都市统计区(M SA)的工人(暴露 MSA)和居住在未受影响的 MSA 的工人的 12 个月和 24 个月结直肠癌筛查和乳房 X 光检查的变化,来检查带薪病假授权与乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查之间的关联。使用大约 2012 年至 2019 年来自 200 万私营部门员工的行政医疗索赔数据进行了比较。
在我们的样本中,有 61 个 MSA 存在带薪病假授权。在授权采用之前,暴露和未暴露 MSA 中的筛查率相似。在调整后的分析中,与未暴露 MSA 的工人相比,居住在暴露 MSA 的工人的癌症筛查率更高,12 个月结直肠癌筛查率高 1.31 个百分点(95%置信区间 [CI],0.28 至 2.34),24 个月结直肠癌筛查率高 1.56 个百分点(95%CI,0.33 至 2.79),12 个月乳房 X 光检查率高 1.22 个百分点(95%CI,-0.20 至 2.64),24 个月乳房 X 光检查率高 2.07 个百分点(95%CI,0.15 至 3.99)。
在美国私营部门工人的样本中,居住在受带薪病假授权影响的 MSA 的工人的癌症筛查率高于居住在未受影响的 MSA 的工人。我们的结果表明,缺乏带薪病假覆盖是癌症筛查的障碍。(由美国国家癌症研究所资助)。