• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2009 - 2020年美国50个州的带薪病假和带薪病假优先适用法律

State Paid Sick Leave and Paid Sick-Leave Preemption Laws Across 50 U.S. States, 2009-2020.

作者信息

Pomeranz Jennifer L, Silver Diana, Lieff Sarah A, Pagán José A

机构信息

Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York.

Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2022 May;62(5):688-695. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.11.018. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2021.11.018
PMID:35459452
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Paid sick leave is associated with lower mortality risks and increased use of health services. Yet, the U.S. lacks a national law, and not all employers offer paid leave, especially to low-wage workers. States have enacted paid sick-leave laws or preemption laws that prohibit local governments from enacting paid sick-leave requirements.

METHODS

In 2019 and 2021, state paid sick-leave laws and preemption laws in effect in 2009-2020 were retrieved from Lexis+, coded, and analyzed for coverage and other features. Data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis were used to estimate the jobs covered by state paid sick-leave laws in 2009-2019.

RESULTS

In 2009, no state had a paid sick-leave law, and 1 state had preemption. By 2020, a total of 12 states had paid sick-leave laws, with a form of preemption (n=9) or no preemption (n=3), and 18 additional states solely preempted local laws without requiring coverage, creating a regulatory vacuum in those states. Although all state paid sick-leave laws covered private employers and required care for children and spouses, some laws exempted small or public employers or did not cover additional family members. The percentage of U.S. jobs covered by state-required paid sick leave grew from 0% in 2009 to 27.6% in 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in state paid sick-leave laws, preemption, and lack of employer provision of paid sick leave to low-wage workers creates substantial inequities nationally. The federal government should enact a national paid sick-leave law.

摘要

引言

带薪病假与较低的死亡风险以及医疗服务使用的增加相关。然而,美国缺乏一项全国性法律,而且并非所有雇主都提供带薪休假,尤其是对低薪工人。各州已经颁布了带薪病假法或先发制人法,禁止地方政府颁布带薪病假要求。

方法

在2019年和2021年,从Lexis+检索了2009 - 2020年生效的州带薪病假法和先发制人法,进行编码并分析其覆盖范围和其他特征。使用美国经济分析局的数据来估计2009 - 2019年州带薪病假法覆盖的工作岗位。

结果

2009年,没有一个州有带薪病假法,有1个州实行先发制人。到2020年,共有12个州有带薪病假法,其中有先发制人形式的(n = 9)或无先发制人的(n = 3),另有18个州仅先发制人地禁止地方法律,而不要求覆盖,在这些州造成了监管真空。虽然所有州的带薪病假法都涵盖私营雇主,并要求照顾子女和配偶,但一些法律豁免了小雇主或公共雇主,或者不涵盖其他家庭成员。州规定的带薪病假覆盖的美国工作岗位比例从2009年的0%增长到2019年的27.6%。

结论

州带薪病假法的差异、先发制人以及雇主未向低薪工人提供带薪病假,在全国范围内造成了严重的不平等。联邦政府应颁布一项全国性的带薪病假法。

相似文献

1
State Paid Sick Leave and Paid Sick-Leave Preemption Laws Across 50 U.S. States, 2009-2020.2009 - 2020年美国50个州的带薪病假和带薪病假优先适用法律
Am J Prev Med. 2022 May;62(5):688-695. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.11.018. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
2
U.S. State Preemption Laws and Working-Age Mortality.美国州级先行法与劳动年龄死亡率
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Nov;63(5):681-688. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
3
Letter to the Editor in Response to "State Paid Sick Leave and Paid Sick-Leave Preemption Laws Across 50 U.S. States, 2009-2020".致编辑的信:回应《2009 - 2020年美国50个州的带薪病假及带薪病假优先适用法律》
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Aug;63(2):e73. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.03.015.
4
Paid sick leave among US private sector employees.美国私营部门员工的带薪病假
Am J Ind Med. 2022 Sep;65(9):743-748. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23417. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
5
Mandates Narrow Gender Gaps In Paid Sick Leave Coverage For Low-Wage Workers In The US.授权令缩小了美国低薪工人带薪病假覆盖范围的性别差距。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Nov;41(11):1575-1582. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00727.
6
Corporate influenced state preemption and health: A legal mapping analysis of workers' rights preemption bills in the US south.企业影响国家立法与健康:美国南部工人权利立法优先法案的法律图谱分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Nov;336:116255. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116255. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
7
The Impact of Connecticut's Paid Sick Leave Law on the Use of Preventive Services.康涅狄格州带薪病假法对预防性服务使用的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jun;60(6):812-819. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.12.023. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
8
State policies that promote, and that inhibit, improved public health: An exploratory analysis of paid sick leave.促进和阻碍改善公共健康的国家政策:对带薪病假的探索性分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;10:1003117. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1003117. eCollection 2022.
9
State Legislative Strategies to Pass, Enhance, and Obscure Preemption of Local Public Health Policy-Making.州立法策略通过、加强和模糊化对地方公共卫生政策制定的预先阻止。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Sep;59(3):333-342. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.023. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
10
The Growing Costs and Burden of Family Caregiving of Older Adults: A Review of Paid Sick Leave and Family Leave Policies.老年人家庭护理成本与负担的不断增加:带薪病假和家庭假政策综述
Gerontologist. 2016 Jun;56(3):391-6. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu093. Epub 2014 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating the impact of state paid sick leave laws on worker outcomes in the U.S. service sector, 2017-2023.评估2017 - 2023年美国各州带薪病假法对服务业工人工作成果的影响。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Jun 20;31:101830. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101830. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Examining Employment Status, Paid Sick Leave, and Access to Care in Relation to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among U.S. Workers: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.美国工人中就业状况、带薪病假与结直肠癌筛查医疗服务可及性的关系研究:一种结构方程建模方法
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251347731. doi: 10.1177/10732748251347731. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
3
Access to Paid Sick Leave and COVID-19 Vaccination Status Among Employed Adults Aged 18-64 Years in the United States, 2021-2022.
2021 - 2022年美国18 - 64岁就业成年人的带薪病假获取情况及新冠疫苗接种状况
Am J Public Health. 2025 Aug;115(8):1308-1311. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2025.308095. Epub 2025 May 22.
4
A difference-in-differences analysis of Medicaid expansion and state paid sick leave laws on colorectal cancer screening.医疗补助扩大计划和州带薪病假法对结直肠癌筛查影响的双重差分分析
Cancer. 2025 May 15;131(10):e35904. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35904.
5
The Impact of Employment Status, Income, and Occupation on the Association Between Workplace Benefits and Health-Related Work Absences.就业状况、收入和职业对工作场所福利与健康相关工作缺勤之间关联的影响。
Am J Ind Med. 2025 Jul;68(7):598-606. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23733. Epub 2025 May 9.
6
Investigating the Association Between Parental Paid Sick Leave Benefit and Children's Dental Care Utilization.调查父母带薪病假福利与儿童牙科护理利用之间的关联。
J Public Health Dent. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12674.
7
Population, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics associated with state preemption laws in the United States, 2009-2018.2009 - 2018年美国与州优先适用法律相关的人口、人口统计学和社会经济特征
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 4;20(4):e0321184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321184. eCollection 2025.
8
State Preemption Repeal: A Pathway to Broader Smoke-Free Indoor Air Policies in the U.S.州优先废除权:美国更广泛的室内无烟空气政策之路
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Jun;68(6):1142-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.02.019. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
9
An Association Between State Laws Limiting Local Control and Community Smoke-Free Indoor Air in the United States.美国限制地方控制权的州法律与社区室内无烟空气之间的关联。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241280905. doi: 10.1177/21501319241280905.
10
Invited commentary: policies that support working parents and gender health equity-needed research and methodological challenges.特邀评论:支持职业父母与性别健康公平的政策——所需研究及方法学挑战
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Feb 5;194(2):331-335. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae223.