Department of Plastic and Aesthetic (Burn) Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha City, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Aug;47(4):1364-1376. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03302-5. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
The upper lip area is an important component of facial aesthetics, and aging produces an increase in the vertical height of the upper lip. Different upper lip lifting techniques are described in the literature.
This systematic review aimed to assess both invasive and noninvasive upper lip lifting techniques with patient satisfaction, adverse effects, and quantitative measurements of lifting efficiency.
This study was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE (OvidSP), and Cochrane Library database were searched from September 14, 2022, to October 12, 2022. Inclusion criteria were reporting on upper lip lift efficiency with quantitative measurements of the lifting degree.
Out of 495 studies through the search strategy, nine articles were included in the systematic review, eight for surgical procedures and one for nonsurgical. Surgical procedures seem to have better longevity than nonsurgical techniques. Reported patient satisfaction for both surgical and nonsurgical treatments was good with no severe complaints. The quantitative measures differ between researches and may be classified into two metrics: anatomy ratio computation using photographic analysis or direct height measurement with a caliper and precise parameters utilizing a three-dimensional method.
In general, surgical therapies seem to have a longer-lasting lifting effect on upper lip lifts with an inevitable scar, while nonsurgical techniques are minimally invasive but temporary. There was a lack of consistency in the measurements used to assess lifting efficiency. A consistent quantitative assessment can be beneficial for both clinical decision-making and high-level evidence research.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
上唇区域是面部美学的重要组成部分,衰老会导致上唇垂直高度增加。文献中描述了不同的上唇提升技术。
本系统评价旨在评估有创和无创上唇提升技术的患者满意度、不良反应以及提升效率的定量测量。
本研究按照 PRISMA 指南进行。于 2022 年 9 月 14 日至 10 月 12 日,通过 MEDLINE(PubMed)、EMBASE(OvidSP)和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库进行检索。纳入标准为报告上唇提升效率,并对提升程度进行定量测量。
通过搜索策略共得到 495 项研究,其中 9 项文章被纳入系统评价,其中 8 项为手术程序,1 项为非手术程序。手术程序似乎比非手术技术具有更长的持久性。两种治疗方法的患者满意度均较好,无严重投诉。报告的定量测量值在不同研究之间存在差异,可分为两种度量标准:使用摄影分析计算解剖比例或使用卡尺进行直接高度测量,以及使用三维方法进行精确参数测量。
一般来说,手术治疗对上唇提升有更长的提升效果,虽然会留下不可避免的疤痕,但非手术技术微创但效果暂时。用于评估提升效率的测量方法缺乏一致性。一致的定量评估对临床决策和高水平证据研究都有益。
证据等级 III:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266 。