Assistant Professor, Global Health Justice and Governance Program, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Associate Professor, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2168399. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2168399.
As governments impose restrictive policies to contain infectious disease outbreaks, pre-existing gender-based inequalities are often exacerbated, increasing the risk of gender-based violence (GBV). Despite international guidance on the need for continued provision of GBV services during emergencies, governments often de-prioritise GBV services and programmes. We conducted a rapid assessment in South Africa, Kenya, Uganda, and Nigeria to examine the impact of COVID-19 policies on the availability of GBV prevention and response services. The study team interviewed 80 stakeholders representing different GBV services in the four countries. The interviews revealed strikingly similar government mis-steps that disrupted the availability of comprehensive GBV services. In all four countries, the government's failure to exempt the provision of multi-sectoral GBV services from initial lockdown restrictions led to confusion and disrupted the provision of critical GBV services such as clinical management of rape, legal and judicial services, psychosocial services, availability of shelters, and community-based prevention activities. The government's imposition of curfews, stay-at-home orders, and transportation restrictions further diminished access to services. Governments must strengthen currently available GBV prevention and response services and be better prepared for future pandemics. Following international guidelines, governments should deem GBV services as essential from the beginning with clear implementation plans. Governments must invest in community-based solutions and the expansion of digital tools to ensure everyone, especially those likely to be structurally excluded, have access to critical services during an emergency.
随着各国政府实施限制政策以遏制传染病的爆发,原本存在的基于性别的不平等现象往往会加剧,从而增加基于性别的暴力(GBV)的风险。尽管国际社会的指导意见要求在紧急情况下继续提供 GBV 服务,但各国政府往往会将 GBV 服务和方案降为次要地位。我们在南非、肯尼亚、乌干达和尼日利亚进行了一项快速评估,以研究 COVID-19 政策对 GBV 预防和应对服务的可用性的影响。研究小组采访了 80 名利益攸关方,他们代表了这四个国家不同的 GBV 服务。访谈揭示了政府惊人相似的错误,这些错误扰乱了全面 GBV 服务的提供。在所有四个国家,政府未能将多部门 GBV 服务的提供从最初的封锁限制中豁免,导致了混乱,扰乱了关键的 GBV 服务的提供,如强奸的临床管理、法律和司法服务、心理社会服务、庇护所的提供以及基于社区的预防活动。政府实施宵禁、居家令和交通限制,进一步减少了服务的可及性。各国政府必须加强现有的 GBV 预防和应对服务,并为未来的大流行做好更好的准备。各国政府应按照国际准则,从一开始就将 GBV 服务视为必不可少的服务,并制定明确的实施计划。政府必须投资于基于社区的解决方案和扩大数字工具的使用,以确保每个人,特别是那些可能在结构上被排除在外的人,在紧急情况下都能获得关键服务。