Ann Fam Med. 2022 Apr 1;20(20 Suppl 1):2910. doi: 10.1370/afm.20.s1.2910.
Context: Frailty and multimorbidity are common in type 2 diabetes, including in middle-aged people (<65 years). Clinical guidelines recommend adjustment of treatment targets in people with frailty or multimorbidity. However, guidelines do not specify how frailty/multimorbidity should be identified. It is not clear if recommendations should be applied to people with frailty/multimorbidity at younger ages. Objective: Assess prevalence and clinical implications of frailty/multimorbidity in middle- to older-aged people with type 2 diabetes using four different measures. Design: Cohort, baseline 2006-2010, median 8 years follow-up. Setting: Community Participants: UK Biobank participants (n=20,566) with type 2 diabetes aged 40-72 years. Exposures: Four measures of frailty (frailty phenotype and frailty index) and multimorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity index and numerical count of long-term conditions (LTCs)). Outcomes: Mortality (all-cause, cardiovascular- and cancer-related mortality), Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE), hospitalization with hypoglycaemia, fall or fracture. Results: Frailty and multimorbidity are prevalent in in people with type 2 diabetes from age 40-72. Individuals identified differed depending on which measure was used: 42% frail of multimorbid by at least one scale; 2.2% were identified by all four scales. Each measure was associated with increased risk of mortality (all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer-related), MACE, hypoglycaemia and falls. The absolute risk of 5-year mortality was higher in older versus younger participants with a given level of frailty (e.g. 1.9%, 4.4%, and 9.9% in men aged, 45, 55, and 65, respectively, using frailty phenotype) or multimorbidity (e.g. 1.3%, 3.7%, and 7.8% in med with 4 long-term conditions aged 45, 55, and 65, respectively). No measure was associated with baseline HbA1c. For the frailty index, Charlson Comorbidity index, and LTC count, the relationship between HbA1c and mortality was consistent across all levels of frailty/multimorbidity. For the frailty phenotype, the relationship between HbA1c and mortality was steeper and more linear in frail compared with pre-frail or robust participants. Conclusion: Assessment of frailty/multimorbidity should be embedded within routine management of middle-aged and older people with type 2 diabetes. Method of identification as well as features such as age impact baseline risk and should influence clinical decisions (eg. glycaemic control).
衰弱和多种合并症在 2 型糖尿病中很常见,包括中年人群(<65 岁)。临床指南建议在衰弱或多种合并症患者中调整治疗目标。然而,指南并未具体说明如何识别衰弱/多种合并症。目前尚不清楚是否应将这些建议应用于年龄较轻的衰弱/多种合并症患者。目的:使用四种不同的方法评估中年至老年 2 型糖尿病患者衰弱/多种合并症的患病率和临床意义。设计:队列研究,基线 2006-2010 年,中位随访 8 年。地点:社区参与者:英国生物银行(UK Biobank)20566 名年龄在 40-72 岁的 2 型糖尿病患者。暴露因素:四种衰弱(衰弱表型和衰弱指数)和多种合并症(Charlson 合并症指数和长期疾病(LTCs)的数量)。结局:死亡率(全因、心血管和癌症相关死亡率)、主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、低血糖、跌倒或骨折住院。结果:40-72 岁的 2 型糖尿病患者衰弱和多种合并症的发病率较高。根据使用的测量方法不同,个体的分类结果也有所不同:至少有一种方法显示 42%的患者衰弱且合并多种疾病;四种方法都显示有 2.2%的患者衰弱且合并多种疾病。每种方法均与死亡率(全因、心血管和癌症相关)、MACE、低血糖和跌倒风险增加相关。在给定的衰弱程度(例如,45、55 和 65 岁的男性分别使用衰弱表型为 1.9%、4.4%和 9.9%)或合并多种疾病(例如,分别有 4 种长期疾病的 45、55 和 65 岁患者分别为 1.3%、3.7%和 7.8%)的情况下,年龄较大的参与者比年龄较小的参与者 5 年死亡率的绝对风险更高。没有一种方法与基线 HbA1c 相关。对于衰弱指数、Charlson 合并症指数和 LTC 计数,HbA1c 与死亡率之间的关系在所有衰弱/多种合并症水平上都是一致的。对于衰弱表型,与非衰弱或健壮参与者相比,HbA1c 与死亡率之间的关系在衰弱患者中更为陡峭和线性。结论:应将衰弱/多种合并症的评估纳入中年和老年 2 型糖尿病患者的常规管理中。识别方法以及年龄等特征会影响基线风险,并应影响临床决策(例如,血糖控制)。