Department of Clinical Medicine, Jining Medical University, No. 133, Hehua Road, Jining, Shandong, China.
Department of Oncology, Liyuan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 39 Yanhu Avenue, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 1;13(1):3503. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30509-y.
At present, no study has established a survival prediction model for non-metastatic primary malignant bone tumors of the spine (PMBS) patients. The clinical features and prognostic limitations of PMBS patients still require further exploration. Data on patients with non-metastatic PBMS from 2004 to 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Multivariate regression analysis using Cox, Best-subset and Lasso regression methods was performed to identify the best combination of independent predictors. Then two nomograms were structured based on these factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The accuracy and applicability of the nomograms were assessed by area under the curve (AUC) values, calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The C-index indicated that the nomograms of OS (C-index 0.753) and CSS (C-index 0.812) had good discriminative power. The calibration curve displays a great match between the model's predictions and actual observations. DCA curves show our models for OS (range: 0.09-0.741) and CSS (range: 0.075-0.580) have clinical value within a specific threshold probability range compared with the two extreme cases. Two nomograms and web-based survival calculators based on established clinical characteristics was developed for OS and CSS. These can provide a reference for clinicians to formulate treatment plans for patients.
目前,尚无研究建立非转移性原发性脊柱恶性骨肿瘤(PMBS)患者的生存预测模型。PMBS 患者的临床特征和预后局限性仍需要进一步探索。从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中提取了 2004 年至 2015 年非转移性 PBMS 患者的数据。使用 Cox、Best-subset 和 Lasso 回归方法进行多变量回归分析,以确定独立预测因子的最佳组合。然后基于这些因素构建了两个用于总生存(OS)和癌症特异性生存(CSS)的列线图。通过曲线下面积(AUC)值、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估列线图的准确性和适用性。结果:C 指数表明 OS(C 指数 0.753)和 CSS(C 指数 0.812)的列线图具有良好的区分能力。校准曲线显示模型预测与实际观察之间具有很好的匹配性。DCA 曲线显示我们的 OS(范围:0.09-0.741)和 CSS(范围:0.075-0.580)模型在特定阈值概率范围内具有临床价值,与两种极端情况相比。基于既定临床特征开发了用于 OS 和 CSS 的两个列线图和基于网络的生存计算器。这些可以为临床医生为患者制定治疗计划提供参考。