• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

射血分数降低的患者血管重建术后发生卒中的决定因素和临床转归。

Determinants and clinical outcomes of stroke following revascularization among patients with reduced ejection fraction.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China.

Department of Neuropsychopharmacology, Beijing Institute of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2023 Apr;13(4):e2927. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2927. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1002/brb3.2927
PMID:36860139
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10097158/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Stoke after revascularization including both percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is an uncommon but devastating complication. Patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) had an increased risk of stroke after revascularization. However, little is known about the determinants and outcomes of stroke among patients with reduced EF following revascularization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort study of patients with preoperative reduced EF (≤40%) who received revascularization by either PCI or CABG between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2014 was performed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent correlates of stroke. Logistic regression models were applied to evaluate the association of stroke with clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 1937 patients were enrolled in this study. Of these, 111 (5.7%) patients suffered from stroke during the median 3.5-year follow-up. Older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; p = .009), history of hypertension (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.18-2.73; p = .007), and history of stroke (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.19-3.36; p = .008) were found to be independent predictors for stroke. Patients with and without stroke had similar risk of all-cause death (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.59-1.41; p = .670). However, stroke was associated with higher odds ratio of heart failure (HF) hospitalization (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.74-4.40; p < .001) and composite end point (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.07-2.42; p = .021).

CONCLUSIONS

Further research appears warranted to minimize the complication of stroke and improve long-term outcomes among patients with reduced EF who underwent such high risk revascularization procedural.

摘要

目的

包括经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)在内的血运重建后的卒中是一种罕见但具有破坏性的并发症。射血分数降低(EF)的患者在血运重建后发生卒中的风险增加。然而,对于 EF 降低的血运重建患者,关于卒中的决定因素和结局知之甚少。

材料和方法

对 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间接受 PCI 或 CABG 血运重建的术前 EF(≤40%)降低的患者进行了队列研究。多变量逻辑回归用于确定卒中的独立相关因素。应用逻辑回归模型评估卒中与临床结局的相关性。

结果

共有 1937 例患者纳入本研究。其中,111 例(5.7%)患者在中位 3.5 年随访期间发生卒中。年龄较大(比值比[OR],1.03;95%置信区间[CI],1.01-1.05;p=0.009)、高血压病史(OR,1.79;95%CI,1.18-2.73;p=0.007)和卒中病史(OR,2.00;95%CI,1.19-3.36;p=0.008)是卒中的独立预测因素。发生卒中和未发生卒中的患者全因死亡风险相似(OR,0.91;95%CI,0.59-1.41;p=0.670)。然而,卒中与心力衰竭(HF)住院(OR,2.77;95%CI,1.74-4.40;p<0.001)和复合终点(OR,1.61;95%CI,1.07-2.42;p=0.021)的发生风险更高。

结论

对于 EF 降低且接受高风险血运重建治疗的患者,进一步的研究似乎是必要的,以减少卒中并发症并改善其长期结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/10097158/22ef280df76a/BRB3-13-e2927-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/10097158/22ef280df76a/BRB3-13-e2927-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/10097158/22ef280df76a/BRB3-13-e2927-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Determinants and clinical outcomes of stroke following revascularization among patients with reduced ejection fraction.射血分数降低的患者血管重建术后发生卒中的决定因素和临床转归。
Brain Behav. 2023 Apr;13(4):e2927. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2927. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
2
Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Severely Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左心室射血分数严重降低患者的长期预后
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):631-641. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0239.
3
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with reduced ejection fraction.射血分数降低的患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;161(3):1022-1031.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.159. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
6
[Efficacy comparison of 3 strategies for real-world stable coronary artery disease patients with three-vessel disease].[三种策略对真实世界中三支血管病变稳定型冠心病患者的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 24;45(12):1049-1057. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.12.009.
7
The impact of successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term clinical outcomes in real world.真实世界中成功的慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对长期临床结局的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Apr 15;21(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-01976-w.
8
Incidence, Characteristics, Predictors, and Outcomes of Repeat Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The SYNTAX Trial at 5 Years.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术后重复血运重建的发生率、特征、预测因素和结果:SYNTAX 试验 5 年随访。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 26;9(24):2493-2507. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.09.044.
9
Comparison of Five-Year Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Triple-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease (from the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗三支血管冠状动脉疾病的五年疗效比较(来自京都经皮冠状动脉介入治疗/冠状动脉旁路移植术注册队列-2的冠状动脉血运重建疗效研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jul 1;116(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.040. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
10
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction With Coronary Artery Revascularization and Subsequent Risk for Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes.经冠状动脉血运重建后左心室射血分数的变化及其随后对不良心血管结局的风险。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Apr;15(4):e011284. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011284. Epub 2022 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of postoperative stroke in patients experienced coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a machine learning approach.冠状动脉旁路移植手术患者术后中风的预测:一种机器学习方法。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 13;11:1448740. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1448740. eCollection 2024.
2
Risk factors and prediction model for acute ischemic stroke after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting based on Bayesian network.基于贝叶斯网络的非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后急性缺血性脑卒中的危险因素及预测模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Nov 19;24(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02762-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Severely Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左心室射血分数严重降低患者的长期预后
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):631-641. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0239.
2
Stroke After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Pathogenesis, and Outcomes.冠状动脉旁路移植术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的卒中:发生率、发病机制及预后
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 2;8(13):e013032. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013032. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
3
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.
冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
4
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2018 Adult Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 2-Statistical Methods and Results.胸外科医师学会 2018 年成人心脏外科学风险模型:第 2 部分-统计方法和结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 May;105(5):1419-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
5
CHADS-VASc score as predictor of ischemic stroke in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention.CHADS-VASc 评分预测行冠状动脉旁路移植术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者发生缺血性卒中。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 12;7(1):11404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11923-5.
6
Comparison of Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction.严重左心室功能不全患者冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架植入术的疗效比较
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;120(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.261. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
7
Frequency of Stroke After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (from an Eleven-Year Statewide Analysis).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术后的卒中发生率(来自一项为期11年的全州分析)
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 15;119(2):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.09.046. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
8
Determinants of Left Ventricular Systolic Function Improvement Following Coronary Artery Revascularization in Heart Failure Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF).射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者冠状动脉血运重建后左心室收缩功能改善的决定因素。
Int Heart J. 2016 Sep 28;57(5):565-72. doi: 10.1536/ihj.16-087. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
9
Failure to Rescue Rates After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: An Analysis From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.冠状动脉旁路移植术后的未能挽救率:来自胸外科医师协会成人心脏手术数据库的分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Aug;102(2):458-64. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.051. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
10
Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease and Severe Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.多支冠状动脉疾病合并严重左心室收缩功能障碍患者的血运重建:依维莫司洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较
Circulation. 2016 May 31;133(22):2132-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.021168. Epub 2016 May 5.