• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉旁路移植手术患者术后中风的预测:一种机器学习方法。

Prediction of postoperative stroke in patients experienced coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a machine learning approach.

作者信息

Chen Shiqi, Wang Kan, Wang Chen, Fan Zhengfeng, Yan Lizhao, Wang Yixuan, Liu Fayuan, Shi JiaWei, Guo QianNan, Dong NianGuo

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Department of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 13;11:1448740. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1448740. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1448740
PMID:39735867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11671478/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery has been a widely accepted method for treating coronary artery disease. However, its postoperative complications can have a significant effect on long-term patient outcomes. A retrospective study was conducted to identify before and after surgery that contribute to postoperative stroke in patients undergoing CABG, and to develop predictive models and recommendations for single-factor thresholds.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We utilized data from 1,200 patients who undergone CABG surgery at the Wuhan Union Hospital from 2016 to 2022, which was divided into a training group ( = 841) and a test group ( = 359). 33 preoperative clinical features and 4 postoperative complications were collected in each group. LASSO is a regression analysis method that performs both variable selection and regularization to enhance model prediction accuracy and interpretability. The LASSO method was used to verify the collected features, and the SHAP value was used to explain the machine model prediction. Six machine learning models were employed, and the performance of the models was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). AUC, or area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, quantifies the ability of a model to distinguish between positive and negative outcomes. Finally, this study provided a convenient online tool for predicting CABG patient post-operative stroke.

RESULTS

The study included a combined total of 1,200 patients in both the development and validation cohorts. The average age of the participants in the study was 60.26 years. 910 (75.8%) of the patients were men, and 153 (12.8%) patients were in NYHA class III and IV. Subsequently, LASSO model was used to identify 11 important features, which were mechanical ventilation time, preoperative creatinine value, preoperative renal insufficiency, diabetes, the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), age, Cardiopulmonary bypass time, Aortic cross-clamp time, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) history, preoperative arrhythmia and Renal artery stenosis in descending order of importance according to the SHAP value. According to the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, AUC, DCA and sensitivity, all seven machine learning models perform well and random forest (RF) machine model was found to perform best (AUC-ROC = 0.9008, Accuracy: 0.9008, Precision: 0.6905; Recall: 0.7532, F1: 0.7205). Finally, an online tool was established to predict the occurrence of stroke after CABG based on the 11 selected features.

CONCLUSION

Mechanical ventilation time, preoperative creatinine value, preoperative renal insufficiency, diabetes, the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), age, Cardiopulmonary bypass time, Aortic cross-clamp time, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) history, preoperative arrhythmia and Renal artery stenosis in the preoperative and intraoperative period was associated with significant postoperative stroke risk, and these factors can be identified and modeled to assist in implementing proactive measures to protect the brain in high-risk patients after surgery.

摘要

背景

冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)一直是治疗冠状动脉疾病广泛接受的方法。然而,其术后并发症会对患者长期预后产生重大影响。进行了一项回顾性研究,以确定冠状动脉旁路移植术患者术前和术后导致术后中风的因素,并建立单因素阈值的预测模型和建议。

材料与方法

我们利用了2016年至2022年在武汉协和医院接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的1200例患者的数据,分为训练组(n = 841)和测试组(n = 359)。每组收集了33项术前临床特征和4项术后并发症。LASSO是一种回归分析方法,它同时进行变量选择和正则化,以提高模型预测准确性和可解释性。使用LASSO方法验证收集到的特征,并使用SHAP值解释机器模型预测。采用了六种机器学习模型,并通过曲线下面积(AUC)和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估模型性能。AUC,即受试者工作特征曲线下面积,量化了模型区分阳性和阴性结果的能力。最后,本研究提供了一个方便的在线工具来预测冠状动脉旁路移植术患者术后中风。

结果

该研究在开发和验证队列中总共纳入了1200例患者。研究参与者的平均年龄为60.26岁。910例(75.8%)患者为男性,153例(12.8%)患者为纽约心脏协会III级和IV级。随后,使用LASSO模型识别出11个重要特征,根据SHAP值按重要性降序排列依次为机械通气时间、术前肌酐值、术前肾功能不全、糖尿病、主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)的使用、年龄、体外循环时间、主动脉阻断时间、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)病史、术前心律失常和肾动脉狭窄。根据受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、AUC、DCA和敏感性分析,所有七个机器学习模型表现良好,发现随机森林(RF)机器模型表现最佳(AUC-ROC = 0.9008,准确性:0.9008,精确率:0.6905;召回率:0.7532,F1:0.7205)。最后,基于选定的11个特征建立了一个在线工具来预测冠状动脉旁路移植术后中风的发生。

结论

术前和术中的机械通气时间、术前肌酐值、术前肾功能不全、糖尿病、主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)的使用、年龄、体外循环时间、主动脉阻断时间、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)病史、术前心律失常和肾动脉狭窄与术后中风风险显著相关,这些因素可以被识别并建模,以协助对术后高危患者实施保护大脑的积极措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/a8168943a4d4/fcvm-11-1448740-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/cfecfb92fba1/fcvm-11-1448740-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/5dbbaa890ab6/fcvm-11-1448740-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/59dff65f31d5/fcvm-11-1448740-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/2953355499a3/fcvm-11-1448740-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/bab7a562d16b/fcvm-11-1448740-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/33dc8259fd22/fcvm-11-1448740-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/2290c188f6af/fcvm-11-1448740-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/2c5340ae7e8d/fcvm-11-1448740-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/a8168943a4d4/fcvm-11-1448740-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/cfecfb92fba1/fcvm-11-1448740-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/5dbbaa890ab6/fcvm-11-1448740-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/59dff65f31d5/fcvm-11-1448740-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/2953355499a3/fcvm-11-1448740-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/bab7a562d16b/fcvm-11-1448740-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/33dc8259fd22/fcvm-11-1448740-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/2290c188f6af/fcvm-11-1448740-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/2c5340ae7e8d/fcvm-11-1448740-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b0a/11671478/a8168943a4d4/fcvm-11-1448740-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of postoperative stroke in patients experienced coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a machine learning approach.冠状动脉旁路移植手术患者术后中风的预测:一种机器学习方法。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 13;11:1448740. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1448740. eCollection 2024.
2
Predictive Value of Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction I and II Scores for Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Isolated On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.年龄、肌酐及射血分数 I 和 II 评分对非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术术后房颤的预测价值:一项多中心回顾性研究
Med Princ Pract. 2025;34(2):162-171. doi: 10.1159/000543188. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
3
Machine learning model-based risk prediction of severe complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.基于机器学习模型的非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术后严重并发症风险预测
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2023 Feb;32(2):185-194. doi: 10.17219/acem/152895.
4
Comparison of Four Machine Learning Techniques for Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay in Heart Transplantation Patients.四种机器学习技术用于预测心脏移植患者重症监护病房住院时长的比较
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 21;9:863642. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.863642. eCollection 2022.
5
Machine-learning predictions for acute kidney injuries after coronary artery bypass grafting: a real-life muticenter retrospective cohort study.机器学习预测冠状动脉旁路移植术后急性肾损伤: 一项真实世界的多中心回顾性队列研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Nov 23;23(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02376-0.
6
An interpretable machine learning model to predict off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting-associated acute kidney injury.一种可解释的机器学习模型,用于预测非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术相关的急性肾损伤。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2024 May;33(5):473-481. doi: 10.17219/acem/169609.
7
Leveraging machine learning to enhance postoperative risk assessment in coronary artery bypass grafting patients with unprotected left main disease: a retrospective cohort study.利用机器学习提高无保护左主干病变冠状动脉搭桥患者的术后风险评估:一项回顾性队列研究
Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7142-7149. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002032.
8
A LASSO-derived model for the prediction of coagulation disorders after coronary artery bypass grafting.一种基于套索回归法得出的用于预测冠状动脉旁路移植术后凝血障碍的模型。
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jan 24;17(1):231-242. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1321. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
9
Application of machine learning model in predicting the likelihood of blood transfusion after hip fracture surgery.机器学习模型在预测髋部骨折手术后输血可能性中的应用。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Nov;35(11):2643-2656. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02550-4. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
10
Machine learning in risk prediction of continuous renal replacement therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients.机器学习在冠状动脉旁路移植术后连续肾脏替代治疗风险预测中的应用。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2024 Aug;28(8):811-821. doi: 10.1007/s10157-024-02472-z. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Adverse Cardiovascular Events After CABG in Patients with Previous Heart Failure.既往心力衰竭患者冠状动脉旁路移植术后不良心血管事件的预测因素
Life (Basel). 2025 Feb 28;15(3):387. doi: 10.3390/life15030387.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants and clinical outcomes of stroke following revascularization among patients with reduced ejection fraction.射血分数降低的患者血管重建术后发生卒中的决定因素和临床转归。
Brain Behav. 2023 Apr;13(4):e2927. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2927. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
2
Comparison of Four Machine Learning Techniques for Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay in Heart Transplantation Patients.四种机器学习技术用于预测心脏移植患者重症监护病房住院时长的比较
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 21;9:863642. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.863642. eCollection 2022.
3
Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors of postoperative stroke in total aortic arch replacement and stent elephant trunk implantation.
全主动脉弓置换及支架象鼻植入术后卒中的术前及术中危险因素
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Apr 28;47:101416. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101416. eCollection 2022 May.
4
STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery.STROCSS 2021:加强外科学队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究报告规范。
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106165. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
Impact of Single versus Double Clamp Technique on Blood Lactate Levels and Postoperative Complications in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.单钳夹与双钳夹技术对冠状动脉旁路移植术患者血乳酸水平及术后并发症的影响。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Mar 10;37(1):55-64. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0025.
6
Artificial intelligence in sepsis early prediction and diagnosis using unstructured data in healthcare.人工智能在使用医疗保健中的非结构化数据进行脓毒症早期预测和诊断中的应用。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 29;12(1):711. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20910-4.
7
Perioperative Stroke and Readmissions Rates in Noncardiac Non-Neurologic Surgery.非心脏非神经外科手术的围手术期卒中与再入院率。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Jun;29(6):104792. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104792. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
8
STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery.STROCSS 2019 指南:加强外科学队列研究报告。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
9
Unusual localization of bleeding under acenocoumarol: Spinal subdural hematoma.醋硝香豆素治疗下出血的异常部位:脊髓硬膜下血肿。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;59:15-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.04.053. Epub 2019 May 10.
10
Perivascular adipose tissue-derived stromal cells contribute to vascular remodeling during aging.血管周脂肪组织来源的基质细胞有助于衰老过程中的血管重塑。
Aging Cell. 2019 Aug;18(4):e12969. doi: 10.1111/acel.12969. Epub 2019 May 14.