Wageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Arch Toxicol. 2023 Apr;97(4):1113-1131. doi: 10.1007/s00204-023-03450-2. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are omnipresent and have been shown to induce a wide range of adverse health effects, including hepatotoxicity, developmental toxicity, and immunotoxicity. The aim of the present work was to assess whether human HepaRG liver cells can be used to obtain insight into differences in hepatotoxic potencies of a series of PFASs. Therefore, the effects of 18 PFASs on cellular triglyceride accumulation (AdipoRed assay) and gene expression (DNA microarray for PFOS and RT-qPCR for all 18 PFASs) were studied in HepaRG cells. BMDExpress analysis of the PFOS microarray data indicated that various cellular processes were affected at the gene expression level. From these data, ten genes were selected to assess the concentration-effect relationship of all 18 PFASs using RT-qPCR analysis. The AdipoRed data and the RT-qPCR data were used for the derivation of in vitro relative potencies using PROAST analysis. In vitro relative potency factors (RPFs) could be obtained for 8 PFASs (including index chemical PFOA) based on the AdipoRed data, whereas for the selected genes, in vitro RPFs could be obtained for 11-18 PFASs (including index chemical PFOA). For the readout OAT5 expression, in vitro RPFs were obtained for all PFASs. In vitro RPFs were found to correlate in general well with each other (Spearman correlation) except for the PPAR target genes ANGPTL4 and PDK4. Comparison of in vitro RPFs with RPFs obtained from in vivo studies in rats indicate that best correlations (Spearman correlation) were obtained for in vitro RPFs based on OAT5 and CXCL10 expression changes and external in vivo RPFs. HFPO-TA was found to be the most potent PFAS tested, being around tenfold more potent than PFOA. Altogether, it may be concluded that the HepaRG model may provide relevant data to provide insight into which PFASs are relevant regarding their hepatotoxic effects and that it can be applied as a screening tool to prioritize other PFASs for further hazard and risk assessment.
全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFASs)无处不在,已被证明会引起多种不良健康影响,包括肝毒性、发育毒性和免疫毒性。本研究旨在评估人 HepaRG 肝细胞是否可用于深入了解一系列 PFASs 的肝毒性差异。因此,研究了 18 种 PFASs 对细胞内甘油三酯积累(AdipoRed 测定法)和基因表达(PFOS 的 DNA 微阵列和所有 18 种 PFASs 的 RT-qPCR)的影响。BMDExpress 对 PFOS 微阵列数据的分析表明,在基因表达水平上,各种细胞过程受到影响。从这些数据中,选择了 10 个基因,使用 RT-qPCR 分析评估所有 18 种 PFASs 的浓度-效应关系。AdipoRed 数据和 RT-qPCR 数据用于通过 PROAST 分析得出体外相对效力。可以根据 AdipoRed 数据获得 8 种 PFASs(包括指数化学物质 PFOA)的体外相对效力因子(RPF),而对于所选基因,可以获得 11-18 种 PFASs(包括指数化学物质 PFOA)的体外 RPF。对于 OAT5 表达的读出,获得了所有 PFASs 的体外 RPF。体外 RPF 通常彼此之间相关性良好(Spearman 相关性),除了 PPAR 靶基因 ANGPTL4 和 PDK4 之外。体外 RPF 与大鼠体内研究中获得的体外 RPF 的比较表明,基于 OAT5 和 CXCL10 表达变化和外部体内 RPF,获得了最佳相关性(Spearman 相关性)。HFPO-TA 被发现是测试的最有效 PFAS,比 PFOA 有效约 10 倍。总的来说,可以得出结论,HepaRG 模型可以提供相关数据,以深入了解哪些 PFASs 与其肝毒性有关,并且可以将其用作筛选工具,以优先考虑其他 PFASs 进行进一步的危害和风险评估。