Suppr超能文献

使用5%外用利多卡因与冷冻锥作为儿童口腔内注射的准备剂时疼痛感知降低情况的比较评估以及虚拟现实脱敏作为分心技术的效果

Comparative Evaluation of Reduction in Pain Perception Using 5% Topical LA vs Freezed Cone as a Preparatory Agent for Intraoral Injection in Children and Effect of VRD as Distraction Technique.

作者信息

Singh Rashi, Gupta Nidhi, Gambhir Natasha

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Santosh Medical/Dental Colleges and Hospital (Deemed to be University), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):558-563. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2453.

Abstract

AIM

To compare freezed cone and 5% lignocaine as a numbing agent before intraoral injection and evaluate the effect of virtual reality distraction (VRD) as a distraction technique in reducing pain perception in children.

STUDY DESIGN

Around 60 children of 6-11 years old undergoing treatment for the extraction or any pulp therapy of primary tooth were selected. Freezed cone and 5% lidocaine were used to decrease the pain during local anesthesia (LA). VRD was used as a distraction method and to analyze the pain perception, Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale was used.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Each child was randomly assigned to receive ice as a topical anesthetic or lignocaine 5% as a topical anesthetic agent. The pain perception was evaluated after the injection of 2% lignocaine hydrochloride (HCL). The primary researcher evaluated the pain during injection using the sound, eye, motor (SEM) scale. The pain experienced during injection was evaluated using Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale.

RESULTS

In the freezed cone group with the VRD technique, maximum responded to the less pain score. On the contrary, many responded to higher pain scores in the freezed cone group without the VRD technique.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that the VRD technique can be used for distraction and the frozen ice cone can be an alternative method to reduce the pain perception during LA.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Singh R, Gupta N, Gambhir N. Comparative Evaluation of Reduction in Pain Perception Using 5% Topical LA vs Freezed Cone as a Preparatory Agent for Intraoral Injection in Children and Effect of VRD as Distraction Technique. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(5):558-563.

摘要

目的

比较冷冻牙胶尖和5%利多卡因作为口腔内注射前的麻醉剂,并评估虚拟现实分散注意力(VRD)作为一种分散注意力技术在降低儿童疼痛感知方面的效果。

研究设计

选取约60名6至11岁正在接受乳牙拔除或任何牙髓治疗的儿童。使用冷冻牙胶尖和5%利多卡因减轻局部麻醉(LA)期间的疼痛。VRD作为一种分散注意力的方法,并使用面部表情疼痛评分量表来分析疼痛感知。

材料与方法

每个孩子被随机分配接受冰作为表面麻醉剂或5%利多卡因作为表面麻醉剂。在注射2%盐酸利多卡因(HCL)后评估疼痛感知。主要研究者使用声音、眼睛、动作(SEM)量表评估注射期间的疼痛。使用面部表情疼痛评分量表评估注射期间经历的疼痛。

结果

在采用VRD技术的冷冻牙胶尖组中,大多数人对较低的疼痛评分有反应。相反,在没有VRD技术的冷冻牙胶尖组中,许多人对较高的疼痛评分有反应。

结论

得出的结论是,VRD技术可用于分散注意力,冷冻冰锥可作为一种减少局部麻醉期间疼痛感知的替代方法。

如何引用本文

Singh R, Gupta N, Gambhir N. 使用5%局部麻醉剂与冷冻牙胶尖作为儿童口腔内注射的预备剂对疼痛感知降低的比较评估以及VRD作为分散注意力技术的效果。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2022;15(5):558 - 563。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4128/9973116/9bae3c18286f/ijcpd-15-558-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验