Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Oral & Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.
J Adv Res. 2016 May;7(3):551-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
Local anesthesia forms the backbone of pain control techniques and is necessary for a painless dental procedure. Nevertheless, administering a local anesthetic injection is among the most anxiety-provoking procedures to children. This study was performed to compare the efficacy of different distraction techniques (passive, active, and passive-active) on children's pain perception during local anesthesia administration. A total of 90 children aged four to nine years, requiring inferior alveolar nerve block for primary molar extraction, were included in this study and randomly divided into three groups according to the distraction technique employed during local anesthesia administration. Passive distraction group: the children were instructed to listen to a song on headphones; Active distraction group: the children were instructed to move their legs up and down alternatively; and Passive-active distraction group: this was a combination between both techniques. Pain perception during local anesthesia administration was evaluated by the Sounds, Eyes, and Motor (SEM) scale and Wong Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale. There was an insignificant difference between the three groups for SEM scale and Wong Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale at P = 0.743 and P = 0.112 respectively. The examined distraction techniques showed comparable results in reducing pain perception during local anesthesia administration.
局部麻醉是疼痛控制技术的基础,对于无痛牙科手术是必要的。然而,给儿童注射局部麻醉剂是最令他们感到焦虑的操作之一。本研究旨在比较不同分散注意力技术(被动、主动和被动-主动)对儿童在接受局部麻醉时疼痛感知的效果。共有 90 名年龄在 4 到 9 岁之间、需要进行下颌神经阻滞以拔除第一磨牙的儿童参与了本研究,并根据在接受局部麻醉时使用的分散注意力技术随机分为三组。被动分散注意力组:指导儿童通过耳机听歌曲;主动分散注意力组:指导儿童交替上下移动腿部;被动-主动分散注意力组:结合了两种技术。通过 Sounds, Eyes, and Motor (SEM) 量表和 Wong Baker FACES®疼痛评估量表评估局部麻醉期间的疼痛感知。在 SEM 量表和 Wong Baker FACES 疼痛评估量表上,三组之间的差异无统计学意义(P=0.743 和 P=0.112)。检查的分散注意力技术在减轻局部麻醉期间的疼痛感知方面显示出相当的效果。