Piché-Renaud Pierre-Philippe, Swayze Sarah, Buchan Sarah A, Wilson Sarah E, Austin Peter C, Morris Shaun K, Nasreen Sharifa, Schwartz Kevin L, Tadrous Mina, Thampi Nisha, Wilson Kumanan, Kwong Jeffrey C
Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute for Health, Policy, Management and Evaluation.
Pediatrics. 2023 Apr 1;151(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-059513.
This study aimed to provide real-world evidence on coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic infection and severe outcomes caused by Omicron in children aged 5 to 11 years.
We used the test-negative study design and linked provincial databases to estimate BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infection and severe outcomes caused by Omicron in children aged 5 to 11 years between January 2 and August 27, 2022 in Ontario. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate VE by time since the latest dose, compared with unvaccinated children, and we evaluated VE by dosing interval.
We included 6284 test-positive cases and 8389 test-negative controls. VE against symptomatic infection declined from 24% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8% to 36%) 14 to 29 days after a first dose and 66% (95% CI, 60% to 71%) 7 to 29 days after 2 doses. VE was higher for children with dosing intervals of ≥56 days (57% [95% CI, 51% to 62%]) than 15 to 27 days (12% [95% CI, -11% to 30%]) and 28 to 41 days (38% [95% CI, 28% to 47%]), but appeared to wane over time for all dosing interval groups. VE against severe outcomes was 94% (95% CI, 57% to 99%) 7 to 29 days after 2 doses and declined to 57% (95%CI, -20% to 85%) after ≥120 days.
In children aged 5 to 11 years, 2 doses of BNT162b2 provide moderate protection against symptomatic Omicron infection within 4 months of vaccination and good protection against severe outcomes. Protection wanes more rapidly for infection than severe outcomes. Overall, longer dosing intervals confer higher protection against symptomatic infection, however protection decreases and becomes similar to shorter dosing interval starting 90 days after vaccination.
本研究旨在提供关于2019冠状病毒病疫苗对5至11岁儿童奥密克戎毒株所致有症状感染和严重后果的有效性的真实世界证据。
我们采用检测阴性研究设计并链接省级数据库,以估算2022年1月2日至8月27日安大略省5至11岁儿童中BNT162b2疫苗对奥密克戎毒株所致有症状感染和严重后果的有效性。我们使用多变量逻辑回归按自最近一剂接种后的时间来估算有效性,并与未接种疫苗的儿童进行比较,且我们按接种间隔评估有效性。
我们纳入了6284例检测呈阳性的病例和8389例检测呈阴性的对照。一剂接种后第14至29天,疫苗对有症状感染的有效性从24%(95%置信区间[CI],8%至36%)下降,两剂接种后第7至29天有效性为66%(95%CI,60%至71%)。接种间隔≥56天的儿童的有效性(57%[95%CI,51%至62%])高于接种间隔15至27天的儿童(12%[95%CI,-11%至30%])和接种间隔28至41天的儿童(38%[95%CI,28%至47%]),但所有接种间隔组的有效性似乎都随时间减弱。两剂接种后第7至29天,疫苗对严重后果的有效性为94%(95%CI,57%至99%),≥120天后降至57%(95%CI,-20%至85%)。
在5至11岁儿童中,两剂BNT162b2疫苗在接种后4个月内对奥密克戎有症状感染提供中等程度的保护,对严重后果提供良好的保护。对感染的保护作用比对严重后果的保护作用消退得更快。总体而言,更长的接种间隔对有症状感染提供更高的保护,然而接种90天后保护作用降低并变得与更短的接种间隔相似。