Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing 44824.
Micronutrients USA LLC, Indianapolis, IN 46231.
J Dairy Sci. 2023 Apr;106(4):2386-2394. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22490. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
Trace mineral (TM) source can potentially alter nutrient digestibility through effects on microbial populations. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether sulfate versus hydroxy (IntelliBond) sources of supplemental Cu, Zn, and Mn had any effect on dry matter intake (DMI), dry matter digestibility, and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility. All available cattle studies (8 studies, 12 comparisons) were used to estimate the effect size (hydroxy mean - sulfate mean). Factors included in the analysis were method of digestibility analysis (total collection, marker-based, or 24 h in situ), study design (randomized design or Latin square), beef (n = 5) versus dairy (n = 7) cattle, and days on treatment; these factors were retained when P < 0.05. Dry matter digestibility was increased by hydroxy TM in beef (1.64 ± 0.35 units) but not in dairy models (0.16 ± 0.13 units) relative to sulfate TM. The NDF digestibility increased significantly with hydroxy versus sulfate TM, but digestibility assessment method influenced this response. Studies using total collection or undigested NDF as a flow marker showed a significant increase (2.68 ± 0.40 units and 1.08 ± 0.31 units, respectively) in NDF digestibility for hydroxy versus sulfate TM; but studies utilizing 24-h in situ incubation did not detect any change (-0.03 ± 0.23 units). These observations may reveal differences in precision of measurement or may indicate mineral effects beyond the rumen; total collection is considered the gold standard method. Hydroxy TM did not affect DMI per animal or per unit of body weight relative to sulfate TM. In conclusion, feeding hydroxy versus sulfate TM does not appear to affect DMI but, depending on type of cattle and method of measurement, can increase dry matter digestibility and NDF digestibility, which may be explained by differences in solubility of the TM sources in rumen, differentially affecting fermentation.
痕量矿物质 (TM) 的来源可能通过对微生物种群的影响来改变养分的消化率。进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定补充铜、锌和锰的硫酸盐与羟基 (IntelliBond) 来源是否对干物质采食量 (DMI)、干物质消化率和中性洗涤剂纤维 (NDF) 消化率有任何影响。使用了所有可用的牛研究 (8 项研究,12 个比较) 来估计效应大小 (羟基平均值 - 硫酸盐平均值)。分析中包括的因素有消化率分析方法 (全收粪法、指示剂法或 24 h 体内法)、研究设计 (随机设计或拉丁方设计)、肉牛 (n = 5) 和奶牛 (n = 7) 以及处理天数;当 P < 0.05 时保留这些因素。与硫酸盐 TM 相比,羟基 TM 使肉牛的干物质消化率增加 (1.64 ± 0.35 个单位),但对奶牛模型没有影响 (0.16 ± 0.13 个单位)。与硫酸盐 TM 相比,羟基 TM 显著增加了 NDF 消化率,但消化率评估方法影响了这种反应。使用全收粪或未消化 NDF 作为流动标记的研究表明,羟基 TM 相对于硫酸盐 TM,NDF 消化率显著增加 (2.68 ± 0.40 个单位和 1.08 ± 0.31 个单位);但利用 24 h 体内孵育的研究没有检测到任何变化 (-0.03 ± 0.23 个单位)。这些观察结果可能揭示了测量精度的差异,或者可能表明除瘤胃外的矿物质影响;全收粪法被认为是金标准方法。与硫酸盐 TM 相比,羟基 TM 对每头动物或每单位体重的 DMI 没有影响。总之,与硫酸盐 TM 相比,喂养羟基 TM 似乎不会影响 DMI,但根据牛的种类和测量方法的不同,它可以提高干物质消化率和 NDF 消化率,这可能是由于 TM 来源在瘤胃中的溶解度不同,从而对发酵产生不同的影响。