Research Clinic for Functional Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Research Center for Existential Health, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway.
Scand J Psychol. 2023 Oct;64(5):543-551. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12911. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
The COVID-19 pandemic was a global health and economic crisis. In the early phase of the pandemic, studies found that populations were reporting lower levels of mental well-being and high levels of distress and worry. This study investigated potential protective and risk factors such as sociodemographics and psychological factors such as adaptation/coping.
Two convenience samples from Norway and Denmark were recruited during the early phase of the first lockdown in May 2020 using snowball sampling primarily by social media. Measures included the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) for screening anxiety and depression, COVID-19 distress, and coping strategies applied during the lockdown. Descriptive analyses were applied as well as bivariate correlations for associations between coping and mental health measures.
Levels of anxiety and depression were not alarmingly high, but being young, single, and female constituted a higher risk for poorer mental health. Applying positive reframing strategies was negatively associated with poor mental health and high COVID-19 stress, whereas distraction coping strategies were positively correlated with poor mental health and high COVID-19 stress.
Applying positive reframing as a coping strategy may constitute a protective factor for mental health in the early phase of a crisis such as a pandemic. This knowledge may inform public health agencies on how to promote mental health in similar situations in the future. However, longitudinal and qualitative studies are needed to investigate the long-term effects of the different coping strategies applied.
COVID-19 大流行是一场全球性的健康和经济危机。在大流行的早期阶段,研究发现人们的心理健康水平较低,焦虑和担忧程度较高。本研究调查了潜在的保护因素和风险因素,如社会人口统计学因素和适应/应对等心理因素。
本研究于 2020 年 5 月大流行期间首次封锁初期,通过雪球抽样主要通过社交媒体从挪威和丹麦招募了两个方便样本。测量工具包括用于筛查焦虑和抑郁的患者健康问卷-4(PHQ-4)、COVID-19 困扰和封锁期间应用的应对策略。采用描述性分析以及相关分析来研究应对与心理健康测量之间的关联。
焦虑和抑郁水平并不高,但年轻、单身和女性构成了较差心理健康的更高风险。积极重新构建策略的应用与较差的心理健康和较高的 COVID-19 压力呈负相关,而分心应对策略与较差的心理健康和较高的 COVID-19 压力呈正相关。
在危机(如大流行)的早期阶段,应用积极重新构建作为应对策略可能构成心理健康的保护因素。这些知识可能为公共卫生机构提供信息,以便在未来类似情况下促进心理健康。然而,需要进行纵向和定性研究来调查应用不同应对策略的长期影响。