School of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.
Chabuchaer County Forestry and Grassland Adminstraton, Ili Valley, Xinjiang, China.
PeerJ. 2023 Feb 28;11:e14905. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14905. eCollection 2023.
and seedlings were used as the test materials to carry out the roots exposure stress model test. By comparing the physiological growth indexes in the leaves of the tested plants, the stress resistance ability was evaluated. The results showed (1) root exposure resulted in excessive oxygen free radicals, which resulted in membrane lipid peroxidation and increased MDA content in two plants. The increase of MDA content in was greater than that in . (2) mainly regulate their own adaptation to the stress by regulating carotenoids. adjusts itself to adapt to the stress by regulating chlorophyll. (3) resist this stress mainly by regulating their respiration rate. (4) mainly through the mobilization of proline, by adjusting the proline concentration to reduce their water potential; reduced its water potential mainly by regulating the concentration of soluble sugar to adapt to the stress. (5) and activated peroxidase () and catalase () to clean up intracellular peroxides, respectively. To sum up, under the same root exposure ratio, there were significant differences in physiological regulation and morphological indexes between . and , but their stress resistance mechanisms were quite different.
以幼苗为试验材料,进行根系暴露胁迫模型试验。通过比较两种植物叶片的生理生长指标,评价其抗逆能力。结果表明:(1)根系暴露导致过量的氧自由基,导致膜脂过氧化,MDA 含量增加,两种植物中 MDA 含量的增加均大于 。(2)主要通过调节类胡萝卜素来调节自身对胁迫的适应。通过调节叶绿素来调节自身对胁迫的适应。(3)主要通过调节呼吸速率来抵抗这种胁迫。(4)主要通过脯氨酸的动员,通过调节脯氨酸浓度来降低水势;通过调节可溶性糖的浓度来适应胁迫,降低水势。(5)和分别激活过氧化物酶()和过氧化氢酶()来清除细胞内的过氧化物。综上所述,在相同的根系暴露比例下,与之间的生理调节和形态指标存在显著差异,但它们的抗应激机制却大不相同。