Saffari Farzad, Kakaria Shobhit, Bigné Enrique, Bruni Luis E, Zarei Sahar, Ramsøy Thomas Z
Neurons Inc., Høje-Taastrup Municipality, Denmark.
Augmented Cognition Lab, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Front Neurosci. 2023 Feb 16;17:1062980. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1062980. eCollection 2023.
Consumer decision-making processes involve a complex interrelation between perception, emotion, and cognition. Despite a vast and diverse literature, little effort has been invested in investigating the neural mechanism behind such processes.
In the present work, our interest was to investigate whether asymmetrical activation of the frontal lobe of the brain could help to characterize consumer's choices. To obtain stronger experimental control, we devised an experiment in a virtual reality retail store, while simultaneously recording participant brain responses using electroencephalogram (EEG). During the virtual store test, participants completed two tasks; first, to choose items from a predefined shopping list, a phase we termed as "planned purchase". Second, subjects were instructed that they could also choose products that were not on the list, which we labeled as "unplanned purchase." We assumed that the planned purchases were associated with a stronger cognitive engagement, and the second task was more reliant on immediate emotional responses.
By analyzing the EEG data based on frontal asymmetry measures, we find that frontal asymmetry in the gamma band reflected the distinction between planned and unplanned decisions, where unplanned purchases were accompanied by stronger asymmetry deflections (relative frontal left activity was higher). In addition, frontal asymmetry in the alpha, beta, and gamma ranges illustrate clear differences between choices and no-choices periods during the shopping tasks.
These results are discussed in light of the distinction between planned and unplanned purchase in consumer situations, how this is reflected in the relative cognitive and emotional brain responses, and more generally how this can influence research in the emerging area of virtual and augmented shopping.
消费者决策过程涉及感知、情感和认知之间复杂的相互关系。尽管有大量丰富多样的文献,但在研究这些过程背后的神经机制方面投入的精力却很少。
在本研究中,我们感兴趣的是探究大脑额叶的不对称激活是否有助于刻画消费者的选择。为了获得更强的实验控制,我们在虚拟现实零售店设计了一项实验,同时使用脑电图(EEG)记录参与者的大脑反应。在虚拟商店测试期间,参与者完成两项任务;首先,从预定义的购物清单中选择商品,我们将这个阶段称为“计划购买”。其次,受试者被告知他们也可以选择清单上没有的产品,我们将其标记为“非计划购买”。我们假设计划购买与更强的认知参与相关,而第二项任务更依赖即时的情感反应。
通过基于额叶不对称测量分析脑电图数据,我们发现伽马波段的额叶不对称反映了计划和非计划决策之间的区别,其中非计划购买伴随着更强的不对称偏转(相对额叶左侧活动更高)。此外,阿尔法、贝塔和伽马波段的额叶不对称说明了购物任务中选择和未选择阶段之间的明显差异。
根据消费者情境中计划购买和非计划购买的区别、这如何在大脑相对的认知和情感反应中得到体现,以及更普遍地这如何影响虚拟和增强购物这一新兴领域的研究来讨论这些结果。