• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替米沙坦与培哚普利对高血压患者的降压作用比较。

Antihypertensive effect of telmisartan versus perindopril in hypertensive patients.

出版信息

Bratisl Lek Listy. 2023;124(5):380-386. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2023_058.

DOI:10.4149/BLL_2023_058
PMID:36876369
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We performed this meta-analysis determining the antihypertensive effect of telmisartan versus perindopril in patients with essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND

The comparison of antihypertensive effects between telmisartan and perindopril were controversial.

METHODS

Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central were searched for all published studies.

RESULTS

The antihypertensive effects were assessed in 753 patients included in 7 trials with a mean follow-up of 20 ± 16 weeks. There was no significant difference between telmisartan and perindopril in reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP, weighted mean differences (WMD) 0.02 (95% confidence interval (CI), ‒2.78, 2.81) mm Hg, p > 0.05). The reduction of diastolic BP (DBP) treated with telmisartan was greater than perindopril in these patients (WMD ‒2.05 (95% CI, ‒2.60, ‒1.49) mm Hg, p < 0.001). Considering the effects of different doses on BP reduction, a sub-analysis was performed. The reduction of DBP treated with 40 mg/day telmisartan was greater than 4‒5 mg/day perindopril (WMD ‒2.18 (95% CI, ‒2.83, ‒1.53) mm Hg, p 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The reduction of DBP is greater treated with telmisartan than perindopril in patients with essential hypertension (Tab. 2, Fig. 4, Ref. 34). Text in PDF www.elis.sk Keywords: essential hypertension, blood pressure, telmisartan, perindopril, meta-analysis.

摘要

目的

本荟萃分析旨在确定替米沙坦与培哚普利在原发性高血压患者中的降压效果。

背景

替米沙坦与培哚普利降压效果的比较存在争议。

方法

检索 Pubmed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Central 以获取所有已发表的研究。

结果

纳入的 7 项试验共 753 例患者的降压效果评估,平均随访 20±16 周。替米沙坦与培哚普利降压效果比较无显著差异(收缩压的加权均数差值为 0.02(95%置信区间,-2.78,2.81)mmHg,p>0.05)。在这些患者中,替米沙坦降低舒张压的效果大于培哚普利(舒张压的加权均数差值为-2.05(95%置信区间,-2.60,-1.49)mmHg,p<0.001)。考虑到不同剂量对血压降低的影响,进行了亚组分析。40mg/天替米沙坦降低舒张压的效果大于 4-5mg/天培哚普利(舒张压的加权均数差值为-2.18(95%置信区间,-2.83,-1.53)mmHg,p<0.05)。

结论

在原发性高血压患者中,替米沙坦降低舒张压的效果大于培哚普利(表 2,图 4,参考文献 34)。

相似文献

1
Antihypertensive effect of telmisartan versus perindopril in hypertensive patients.替米沙坦与培哚普利对高血压患者的降压作用比较。
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2023;124(5):380-386. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2023_058.
2
A Meta-analysis of antihypertensive effect of telmisartan versus candesartan in patients with essential hypertension.替米沙坦与坎地沙坦治疗原发性高血压的降压作用的 Meta 分析。
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2019;41(1):75-79. doi: 10.1080/10641963.2018.1445750. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
3
The efficacy of telmisartan compared with perindopril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.替米沙坦与培哚普利治疗轻至中度高血压患者的疗效比较。
Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2004 Dec(145):50-4.
4
Telmisartan versus angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.替米沙坦与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗高血压的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Hum Hypertens. 2009 May;23(5):339-49. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2008.132. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
5
Comparison of trough effect of telmisartan vs perindopril using self blood pressure measurement: EVERESTE study.使用自测血压比较替米沙坦与培哚普利的谷效应:EVERESTE研究
J Hum Hypertens. 2002 Dec;16(12):865-73. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001494.
6
Comparative review of the blood pressure-lowering and cardiovascular benefits of telmisartan and perindopril.替米沙坦与培哚普利降压及心血管获益的比较性综述
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014 Apr 5;10:189-200. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S59429. eCollection 2014.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of a fixed, low-dose perindopril-indapamide combination as first-line treatment of hypertension.对固定低剂量培哚普利 - 吲达帕胺联合用药作为高血压一线治疗的疗效和安全性进行的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Clin Ther. 2004 Feb;26(2):257-70. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90024-0.
8
Antihypertensive effect of azilsartan versus olmesartan in patients with essential hypertension: a meta-analysis.阿齐沙坦与奥美沙坦对原发性高血压患者的降压效果:一项荟萃分析。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 May;188(2):481-488. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1859-1. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
9
Randomized trial of perindopril, enalapril, losartan and telmisartan in overweight or obese patients with hypertension.培哚普利、依那普利、氯沙坦和替米沙坦治疗超重或肥胖高血压患者的随机试验。
Clin Drug Investig. 2013 Aug;33(8):553-61. doi: 10.1007/s40261-013-0094-9.
10
Comparison of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 40/12.5 mg and 80/12.5 mg and a fixed-dose combination of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50/12.5 mg in mild to moderate essential hypertension: pooled analysis of two multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point (PROBE) trials.替米沙坦/氢氯噻嗪40/12.5毫克和80/12.5毫克固定剂量组合与氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪50/12.5毫克固定剂量组合治疗轻度至中度原发性高血压的比较:两项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点(PROBE)试验的汇总分析
Clin Ther. 2005 Nov;27(11):1795-805. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.014.