Rosenfeld L F, Kennedy E E, Perlmutter R A, Bookbinder M J, McPherson C A, Batsford W P
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.
Am Heart J. 1987 Dec;114(6):1367-74. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90538-2.
Thirty-three patients treated with an abbreviated oral amiodarone loading regimen for ventricular tachycardia underwent electrophysiologic testing in the control state, after 1 week of high-dose (1170 +/- 88 mg/day) inpatient therapy; and after an 8-week intermediate (669 +/- 129 mg/day) dosing phase. Serum levels of amiodarone and desethylamiodarone were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography during follow-up electrophysiologic studies. Although the corrected sinus node recovery time, sinoatrial conduction time, and AH and HV intervals remained unchanged throughout the loading period, the sinus cycle length, Wenckebach cycle length, atrial and ventricular refractory periods, and ventricular tachycardia mean and return cycle lengths lengthened significantly by 1 week. They then remained stable for the remainder of the treatment period (control less than 1 and 8 weeks, p less than 0.05). In contrast, amiodarone and especially desethylamiodarone levels rose from 1 to 8 weeks: 1.29 +/- 0.56 to 1.97 +/- 0.90 micrograms/ml (p = 0.001) and 0.63 +/- 0.29 to 1.29 +/- 0.61 micrograms/ml (p less than 0.0001), respectively. Because this regimen produces relatively prompt electrophysiologic changes, which then stabilize, early outpatient management becomes feasible before pharmacologic steady state is attained.
33例接受简化口服胺碘酮负荷方案治疗室性心动过速的患者,在对照状态下、高剂量(1170±88mg/天)住院治疗1周后以及8周的中等剂量(669±129mg/天)给药阶段后,均接受了电生理检查。在后续的电生理研究中,通过高压液相色谱法测定血清胺碘酮和去乙基胺碘酮水平。尽管在整个负荷期校正窦房结恢复时间、窦房传导时间以及AH和HV间期保持不变,但窦性周期长度、文氏周期长度、心房和心室不应期以及室性心动过速的平均和折返周期长度在1周时显著延长。然后在治疗期的剩余时间内保持稳定(对照与1周和8周相比,p<0.05)。相比之下,胺碘酮尤其是去乙基胺碘酮水平从1周升至8周:分别从1.29±0.56μg/ml升至1.97±0.90μg/ml(p=0.001)以及从0.63±0.29μg/ml升至1.29±0.61μg/ml(p<0.0001)。由于该方案能产生相对迅速的电生理变化,随后趋于稳定,因此在达到药物稳态之前早期门诊管理变得可行。