Department of Psychology, University of Memphis.
Sch Psychol. 2023 Sep;38(5):319-329. doi: 10.1037/spq0000541. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
This study evaluated the inclusion and representation of women serving on school psychology journal editorial boards from 1965 to 2020. A total of 3,267 names were collected from six journals at 5-year increments and coded for gender using a four-step process. Across 55 years, women constituted 38% of editorial boards across these journals. When considering their levels of service, they constituted 10% of editors, 42% of associate editors, and 39% of board members. Women demonstrated a consistent increase in participation across all levels, with an overall change from 3.4% to 54.8%. In 2020, five out of six journals included more than 50% women on their editorial boards. However, underrepresentation of women is still apparent as recent reports showed women compose 87% of school psychologists, 63% of school psychology faculty, and 85% of school psychology doctoral recipients. Low numbers of women as editors as well as differences in women's participation across journals suggest a need for further evaluation of potential bias and gender-related barriers related to service in school psychology journals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究评估了 1965 年至 2020 年期间,在学校心理学杂志编辑委员会任职的女性的纳入和代表性。从六本期刊中以每五年为一个增量收集了 3267 个名字,并使用四步流程对性别进行了编码。在 55 年的时间里,女性构成了这些期刊编辑委员会的 38%。考虑到她们的服务水平,她们中有 10%是编辑,42%是副编辑,39%是董事会成员。女性在所有层面的参与度都持续增加,总体变化从 3.4%增加到 54.8%。2020 年,六本期刊中有五本期刊的编辑委员会中女性比例超过 50%。然而,女性的代表性不足仍然很明显,因为最近的报告显示,女性占学校心理学家的 87%,学校心理学教师的 63%,以及学校心理学博士学位获得者的 85%。担任编辑的女性人数较少,以及女性在期刊中的参与度存在差异,这表明需要进一步评估与在学校心理学期刊中服务相关的潜在偏见和性别相关障碍。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。