Staquet M, Brown B W, Rozencweig M, Van Muylder E, Dodion P, Sanders C
EORTC Data Center, Brussels, Belgium.
Am J Clin Oncol. 1987 Dec;10(6):485-90. doi: 10.1097/00000421-198712000-00005.
The in vitro evaluation of new antineoplastic agents has been advocated as a method of selecting drugs for Phase I-II trials in patients. This paper is an attempt to validate, in an unbiased manner, the so-called in vitro Phase II clonogenic assay with regard to its predictive power in the clinic. Breast and ovarian cancer were chosen because of the relatively large number of drugs clinically evaluated for these diseases; 298 patients were studied. For metastatic breast cancer 12 drugs, six clinically active and six inactive, were tested. It was found that in patients without prior chemotherapy, there is an association between results in vitro and in vivo. In metastatic ovarian cancer, 11 drugs, four of which are known to be clinically inactive, were studied. The same positive association was seen for patients without prior chemotherapy. The implications of these findings are discussed.
新抗肿瘤药物的体外评估已被提倡作为一种为患者选择进行I-II期试验药物的方法。本文试图以一种无偏倚的方式验证所谓的体外II期克隆形成试验在临床中的预测能力。选择乳腺癌和卵巢癌是因为针对这些疾病进行临床评估的药物数量相对较多;共研究了298例患者。对于转移性乳腺癌,测试了12种药物,其中6种临床有效,6种无效。发现在未接受过化疗的患者中,体外和体内结果之间存在关联。对于转移性卵巢癌,研究了11种药物,其中4种已知临床无效。在未接受过化疗的患者中也观察到了同样的正相关。讨论了这些发现的意义。