Suppr超能文献

评估微创前外侧入路行或不行转子间翻转截骨术的初次全髋关节置换术对髋关节外展肌损伤。

Assessment of the Damage to Hip Abductor Muscles in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Minimally Invasive Anterolateral Approach With or Without Trochanteric Flip Osteotomy.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Sakyo-ku, Japan.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6):1082-1088. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.02.075. Epub 2023 Mar 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although introduction of minimally invasive techniques via anterolateral approaches considerably decreased prolonged limp after total hip arthroplasty (THA), potential damage to the abductor muscles is still a concern. This study aimed to evaluate the residual damage after primary THA with two types of anterolateral approach by assessing fatty infiltration and atrophy of the gluteus medius (GMed) and gluteus minimus (GMin) muscles.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 100 primary THAs using computed tomography; surgeries were performed by detaching the anterior part of the abductor muscles with a bone fragment (anterolateral approach with trochanteric flip osteotomy) or without it (anterolateral approach without trochanteric flip osteotomy). The change in radiodensities (RDs), cross-sectional areas (CSAs), and clinical scores preoperatively and at 1 year after operation were evaluated.

RESULTS

The RD and CSA of GMed increased 1 year postoperatively in 86 and 81% of patients, respectively, while RD and CSA of GMin decreased in 71 and 94%, respectively. The improvement of RD of GMed was more frequently seen in the posterior rather than the anterior part, while the GMin decreased in both parts. The RD decrease of GMin was significantly lower in the anterolateral approach with trochanteric flip osteotomy group than the anterolateral approach without trochanteric flip osteotomy group (P = .0250). However, there was no difference in the clinical scores between the two groups. The change in the RD of GMed was the only factor that correlated with clinical scores.

CONCLUSION

The two anterolateral approaches both improved the RD of GMed, recovery of which was significantly associated with postoperative clinical scores. Although the two approaches showed different recovery patterns in GMin until 1 year after THA, both showed similar improvements in clinical scores.

摘要

背景

尽管通过前外侧入路引入微创技术大大降低了全髋关节置换术后(THA)的长期跛行,但对臀中肌(GMed)和臀小肌(GMin)的外展肌的潜在损伤仍然是一个关注点。本研究旨在通过评估 GMed 和 GMin 肌肉的脂肪浸润和萎缩来评估两种前外侧入路初次 THA 后的残留损伤。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 100 例使用计算机断层扫描的初次 THA;手术通过分离带有骨碎片(带转子翻转截骨术的前外侧入路)或不分离骨碎片(无前转子翻转截骨术的前外侧入路)的前部分的外展肌进行。评估术前和术后 1 年的放射密度(RD)、横截面积(CSA)和临床评分的变化。

结果

86%的患者术后 1 年 GMed 的 RD 和 CSA 分别增加了 1 年,而 71%的患者 GMin 的 RD 和 CSA 分别减少了 94%。GMed 的 RD 改善更常见于后部而不是前部,而 GMin 则在两部分均减少。带转子翻转截骨术的前外侧入路组 GMin 的 RD 减少明显低于无前转子翻转截骨术的前外侧入路组(P =.0250)。然而,两组的临床评分无差异。GMed 的 RD 变化是与临床评分相关的唯一因素。

结论

两种前外侧入路均改善了 GMed 的 RD,其恢复与术后临床评分显著相关。尽管两种方法在 THA 后 1 年内对 GMin 的恢复模式不同,但在临床评分方面都有相似的改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验