Suppr超能文献

同一关节有脓毒性翻修史患者出现意外的阳性培养结果。

Unexpected Positive Cultures in Patients Who Have a History of Septic Revision in the Same Joint.

作者信息

Ribau Ana, Ekhtiari Seper, Budin Maximilian, Zanna Luigi, Dasci Mustafa Fatih, Gehrke Thorsten, Citak Mustafa

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6):1141-1144. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.02.078. Epub 2023 Mar 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) in an aseptic revision surgery of the joint with a prior septic revision in the same joint remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of UPC in that specific group. As secondary outcomes, we explored risk factors for UPC.

METHODS

This retrospective study includes patients who had an aseptic revision total hip/knee arthroplasty procedure with a prior septic revision in the same joint. Patients who had less than 3 microbiology samples, without joint aspiration or with aseptic revision surgery performed <3 weeks after a septic revision were excluded. The UPC was defined as a single positive culture in a revision that the surgeon had classified as aseptic according to the 2018 International Consensus Meeting. After excluding 47, a total of 92 patients were analyzed, who had a mean age of 70 years (range, 38 to 87). There were 66 (71.7%) hips and 26 (28.3%) knees. The mean time between revisions was 83 months (range, 31 to 212).

RESULTS

We identified 11 (12%) UPC and in 3 cases there was a concordance of the bacteria compared to the previous septic surgery. There were no differences for UPC between hips/knees (P = .282), diabetes (P = .701), immunosuppression (P = .252), previous 1-stage or 2-stages (P = .316), causes for the aseptic revision (P = .429) and time after the septic revision (P = .773).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of UPC in this specific group was similar to those reported in the literature for aseptic revisions. More studies are needed to better interpret the results.

摘要

背景

在同一关节先前有感染性翻修手术的无菌性关节翻修手术中,意外阳性培养物(UPC)的发生率尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定该特定群体中UPC的发生率。作为次要结果,我们探讨了UPC的危险因素。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了在同一关节先前有感染性翻修手术的无菌性全髋关节/膝关节置换翻修手术患者。排除微生物样本少于3份、未进行关节穿刺或在感染性翻修手术<3周后进行无菌性翻修手术的患者。根据2018年国际共识会议,UPC被定义为外科医生分类为无菌的翻修手术中单一阳性培养物。排除47例后,共分析了92例患者,他们的平均年龄为70岁(范围38至87岁)。其中有66例(71.7%)髋关节和26例(28.3%)膝关节。两次翻修之间的平均时间为83个月(范围31至212个月)。

结果

我们确定了11例(12%)UPC,其中3例与先前感染性手术的细菌一致。髋关节/膝关节之间(P = 0.282)、糖尿病(P = 0.701)、免疫抑制(P = 0.252)、先前1期或2期(P = 0.316)、无菌性翻修的原因(P = 0.429)以及感染性翻修后的时间(P = 0.773)在UPC方面无差异。

结论

该特定群体中UPC的发生率与文献报道的无菌性翻修相似。需要更多研究以更好地解释结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验